Cargando…
Time and skeptical opinion content erode the effects of science coverage on climate beliefs and attitudes
Although experiments show that exposure to factual information can increase factual accuracy, the public remains stubbornly misinformed about many issues. Why do misperceptions persist even when factual interventions generally succeed at increasing the accuracy of people’s beliefs? We seek to answer...
Autores principales: | Nyhan, Brendan, Porter, Ethan, Wood, Thomas J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122069119 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Spiritual skepticism? Heterogeneous science skepticism in the Netherlands
por: Rutjens, Bastiaan T., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Presenting ideas to skeptical people
por: Charvet, Shelle Rose
Publicado: (2002) -
Correlates of COVID-19 vaccination intentions: Attitudes, institutional trust, fear, conspiracy beliefs, and vaccine skepticism
por: Seddig, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Ethnic antagonism erodes Republicans’ commitment to democracy
por: Bartels, Larry M.
Publicado: (2020) -
A Closer Look at Climate Change Skepticism
por: Schmidt, Charles W.
Publicado: (2010)