Cargando…

Inverse Association Between Bystander Use of Audiovisual Feedback From an Automated External Defibrillator and Return of Spontaneous Circulation

BACKGROUND: Treatment with an automated external defibrillator (AED) improves outcome in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Audiovisual feedback from an AED may assist bystanders achieve higher quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, the association between audiovisual feedback and clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obling, Laust, Hassager, Christian, Blomberg, Stig Nikolaj, Folke, Fredrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35156420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023232
_version_ 1784738831808856064
author Obling, Laust
Hassager, Christian
Blomberg, Stig Nikolaj
Folke, Fredrik
author_facet Obling, Laust
Hassager, Christian
Blomberg, Stig Nikolaj
Folke, Fredrik
author_sort Obling, Laust
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment with an automated external defibrillator (AED) improves outcome in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Audiovisual feedback from an AED may assist bystanders achieve higher quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, the association between audiovisual feedback and clinical outcomes is not well assessed in real‐life OHCA. The aim of this study was to assess the association between audiovisual feedback from an AED used in bystander resuscitation with rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and 30‐day survival in a real‐life cohort of patients with OHCA. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 325 patients treated with bystander AED use before arrival of emergency medical services during 2016 to 2019 from the Capital Region of Denmark. Patients were divided into a “feedback” and a “nonfeedback” group, depending on presence of audiovisual feedback from the AED. Audiovisual feedback was defined as voice prompts with continuous feedback to ongoing resuscitation. Rates of ROSC upon hospital admission and 30‐day survival were assessed, and univariate and multivariable models were applied to decide the association to audiovisual feedback. Multivariable models were adjusted for sex, age, primary heart rhythm, and location of OHCA. A total of 155 (48%) patients had a bystander AED applied with audiovisual feedback and 170 (52%) without audiovisual feedback. A lower rate of ROSC was found in the feedback group compared with the nonfeedback group (33% [n=51] versus 45% [n=76]; P=0.03). No association was observed between AV feedback and 30‐day survival (feedback=27% [n=42] and nonfeedback=31% [n=53]; P=0.49). In the unadjusted logistic regression model, audiovisual feedback was associated with a decreased chance of ROSC (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38–0.95; P=0.03), which remained significant after adjusted analysis (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29–0.97; P=0.04), whereas we found no significant association between audiovisual feedback and 30‐day survival in the unadjusted and adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Audiovisual feedback from an AED used by bystanders was associated with a lower chance of ROSC at hospital admission, but we found no significant difference in 30‐day survival. Focus on early and correct bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and AED use remain key for OHCA survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9245825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92458252022-07-01 Inverse Association Between Bystander Use of Audiovisual Feedback From an Automated External Defibrillator and Return of Spontaneous Circulation Obling, Laust Hassager, Christian Blomberg, Stig Nikolaj Folke, Fredrik J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Treatment with an automated external defibrillator (AED) improves outcome in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Audiovisual feedback from an AED may assist bystanders achieve higher quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, the association between audiovisual feedback and clinical outcomes is not well assessed in real‐life OHCA. The aim of this study was to assess the association between audiovisual feedback from an AED used in bystander resuscitation with rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and 30‐day survival in a real‐life cohort of patients with OHCA. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 325 patients treated with bystander AED use before arrival of emergency medical services during 2016 to 2019 from the Capital Region of Denmark. Patients were divided into a “feedback” and a “nonfeedback” group, depending on presence of audiovisual feedback from the AED. Audiovisual feedback was defined as voice prompts with continuous feedback to ongoing resuscitation. Rates of ROSC upon hospital admission and 30‐day survival were assessed, and univariate and multivariable models were applied to decide the association to audiovisual feedback. Multivariable models were adjusted for sex, age, primary heart rhythm, and location of OHCA. A total of 155 (48%) patients had a bystander AED applied with audiovisual feedback and 170 (52%) without audiovisual feedback. A lower rate of ROSC was found in the feedback group compared with the nonfeedback group (33% [n=51] versus 45% [n=76]; P=0.03). No association was observed between AV feedback and 30‐day survival (feedback=27% [n=42] and nonfeedback=31% [n=53]; P=0.49). In the unadjusted logistic regression model, audiovisual feedback was associated with a decreased chance of ROSC (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38–0.95; P=0.03), which remained significant after adjusted analysis (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29–0.97; P=0.04), whereas we found no significant association between audiovisual feedback and 30‐day survival in the unadjusted and adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Audiovisual feedback from an AED used by bystanders was associated with a lower chance of ROSC at hospital admission, but we found no significant difference in 30‐day survival. Focus on early and correct bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and AED use remain key for OHCA survival. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9245825/ /pubmed/35156420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023232 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Obling, Laust
Hassager, Christian
Blomberg, Stig Nikolaj
Folke, Fredrik
Inverse Association Between Bystander Use of Audiovisual Feedback From an Automated External Defibrillator and Return of Spontaneous Circulation
title Inverse Association Between Bystander Use of Audiovisual Feedback From an Automated External Defibrillator and Return of Spontaneous Circulation
title_full Inverse Association Between Bystander Use of Audiovisual Feedback From an Automated External Defibrillator and Return of Spontaneous Circulation
title_fullStr Inverse Association Between Bystander Use of Audiovisual Feedback From an Automated External Defibrillator and Return of Spontaneous Circulation
title_full_unstemmed Inverse Association Between Bystander Use of Audiovisual Feedback From an Automated External Defibrillator and Return of Spontaneous Circulation
title_short Inverse Association Between Bystander Use of Audiovisual Feedback From an Automated External Defibrillator and Return of Spontaneous Circulation
title_sort inverse association between bystander use of audiovisual feedback from an automated external defibrillator and return of spontaneous circulation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35156420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023232
work_keys_str_mv AT oblinglaust inverseassociationbetweenbystanderuseofaudiovisualfeedbackfromanautomatedexternaldefibrillatorandreturnofspontaneouscirculation
AT hassagerchristian inverseassociationbetweenbystanderuseofaudiovisualfeedbackfromanautomatedexternaldefibrillatorandreturnofspontaneouscirculation
AT blombergstignikolaj inverseassociationbetweenbystanderuseofaudiovisualfeedbackfromanautomatedexternaldefibrillatorandreturnofspontaneouscirculation
AT folkefredrik inverseassociationbetweenbystanderuseofaudiovisualfeedbackfromanautomatedexternaldefibrillatorandreturnofspontaneouscirculation