Cargando…

Social media video analysis methodology for sarin exposure

As social media becomes increasingly ubiquitous, many events are recorded and released on social media platforms, including chemical weapon attacks. We develop an objective tool in order to evaluate brief and unstructured social media videos for analysing sarin exposure from a civilian medical patho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toprak, Sadik, Can, Emine Yilmaz, Altinsoy, Bulent, Hart, John, Dogan, Zekeriya, Ozcetin, Mustafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9246001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35784424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2020.1825061
_version_ 1784738873353437184
author Toprak, Sadik
Can, Emine Yilmaz
Altinsoy, Bulent
Hart, John
Dogan, Zekeriya
Ozcetin, Mustafa
author_facet Toprak, Sadik
Can, Emine Yilmaz
Altinsoy, Bulent
Hart, John
Dogan, Zekeriya
Ozcetin, Mustafa
author_sort Toprak, Sadik
collection PubMed
description As social media becomes increasingly ubiquitous, many events are recorded and released on social media platforms, including chemical weapon attacks. We develop an objective tool in order to evaluate brief and unstructured social media videos for analysing sarin exposure from a civilian medical pathology perspective. We developed and validated this new questionnaire using a standardized procedure that includes content domain specification, item pool generation, content validity evaluation, a pilot study, and assessment of reliability and validity. In total, 51 sarin attacks and 48 matched videos were analysed. Cronbach’s α for all 20 items was 0.75, which indicates adequate internal reliability. The test–retest reliability was 0.96, which indicates good internal reliability. The inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.97. After verifying sampling adequacy with the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure and the factorability of the items with Barlett’s test of sphericity, a factor analysis was performed. According to the principal axis factoring, a six-factor solution explained 51.86% of the total variance. The receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the Video Score Questionnaire has a sensitivity of 0.817, a specificity of 0.478, and an efficiency of 65.3. Therefore, the Video Score Questionnaire is reliable and valid for evaluating sarin attacks from brief and unstructured social media videos. KEY POINTS: Chemical weapons are still used as a method of warfare. Social media videos are an important source of information. We developed a validated scale which can analyse sarin exposure in short and unstructured videos.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9246001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92460012022-07-01 Social media video analysis methodology for sarin exposure Toprak, Sadik Can, Emine Yilmaz Altinsoy, Bulent Hart, John Dogan, Zekeriya Ozcetin, Mustafa Forensic Sci Res Original Articles As social media becomes increasingly ubiquitous, many events are recorded and released on social media platforms, including chemical weapon attacks. We develop an objective tool in order to evaluate brief and unstructured social media videos for analysing sarin exposure from a civilian medical pathology perspective. We developed and validated this new questionnaire using a standardized procedure that includes content domain specification, item pool generation, content validity evaluation, a pilot study, and assessment of reliability and validity. In total, 51 sarin attacks and 48 matched videos were analysed. Cronbach’s α for all 20 items was 0.75, which indicates adequate internal reliability. The test–retest reliability was 0.96, which indicates good internal reliability. The inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.97. After verifying sampling adequacy with the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure and the factorability of the items with Barlett’s test of sphericity, a factor analysis was performed. According to the principal axis factoring, a six-factor solution explained 51.86% of the total variance. The receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the Video Score Questionnaire has a sensitivity of 0.817, a specificity of 0.478, and an efficiency of 65.3. Therefore, the Video Score Questionnaire is reliable and valid for evaluating sarin attacks from brief and unstructured social media videos. KEY POINTS: Chemical weapons are still used as a method of warfare. Social media videos are an important source of information. We developed a validated scale which can analyse sarin exposure in short and unstructured videos. Taylor & Francis 2020-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9246001/ /pubmed/35784424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2020.1825061 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of the Academy of Forensic Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Toprak, Sadik
Can, Emine Yilmaz
Altinsoy, Bulent
Hart, John
Dogan, Zekeriya
Ozcetin, Mustafa
Social media video analysis methodology for sarin exposure
title Social media video analysis methodology for sarin exposure
title_full Social media video analysis methodology for sarin exposure
title_fullStr Social media video analysis methodology for sarin exposure
title_full_unstemmed Social media video analysis methodology for sarin exposure
title_short Social media video analysis methodology for sarin exposure
title_sort social media video analysis methodology for sarin exposure
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9246001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35784424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2020.1825061
work_keys_str_mv AT topraksadik socialmediavideoanalysismethodologyforsarinexposure
AT canemineyilmaz socialmediavideoanalysismethodologyforsarinexposure
AT altinsoybulent socialmediavideoanalysismethodologyforsarinexposure
AT hartjohn socialmediavideoanalysismethodologyforsarinexposure
AT doganzekeriya socialmediavideoanalysismethodologyforsarinexposure
AT ozcetinmustafa socialmediavideoanalysismethodologyforsarinexposure