Cargando…
Differences in thinking flexibility between novices and experts based on eye tracking
The influence of thinking flexibility on design is often underestimated by researchers in the field of design education. In this study, morphological analysis was used as a tool to develop design proposals and eye tracking technology was applied to track the attention. The feature of thinking activi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9246232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35771796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269363 |
_version_ | 1784738928942645248 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Mengyao Bao, Defu Yu, Yuxiang Shen, Danni Yi, Minzhe |
author_facet | Zhu, Mengyao Bao, Defu Yu, Yuxiang Shen, Danni Yi, Minzhe |
author_sort | Zhu, Mengyao |
collection | PubMed |
description | The influence of thinking flexibility on design is often underestimated by researchers in the field of design education. In this study, morphological analysis was used as a tool to develop design proposals and eye tracking technology was applied to track the attention. The feature of thinking activities in problem-solving between two groups (novice and expert) was analyzed by Heat map and Gaze plot in qualitative, and measured by indicators such as fixation and saccade in quantitative. Findings suggested that, i) Experts showed more fixation duration and fixation numbers in thinking activities, and the attention containing more AOIs was positively related to the rationality of the scheme. ii) Saccades with greater amplitude were more beneficial to the novelty of scheme. iii) Experts considered the information of each block in a balanced way, while novices tended to ignore unimportant blocks. These results will have a far-reaching impact on the development of designers’ thinking and help novices to exercise creative thinking and produce high-quality designs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9246232 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92462322022-07-01 Differences in thinking flexibility between novices and experts based on eye tracking Zhu, Mengyao Bao, Defu Yu, Yuxiang Shen, Danni Yi, Minzhe PLoS One Research Article The influence of thinking flexibility on design is often underestimated by researchers in the field of design education. In this study, morphological analysis was used as a tool to develop design proposals and eye tracking technology was applied to track the attention. The feature of thinking activities in problem-solving between two groups (novice and expert) was analyzed by Heat map and Gaze plot in qualitative, and measured by indicators such as fixation and saccade in quantitative. Findings suggested that, i) Experts showed more fixation duration and fixation numbers in thinking activities, and the attention containing more AOIs was positively related to the rationality of the scheme. ii) Saccades with greater amplitude were more beneficial to the novelty of scheme. iii) Experts considered the information of each block in a balanced way, while novices tended to ignore unimportant blocks. These results will have a far-reaching impact on the development of designers’ thinking and help novices to exercise creative thinking and produce high-quality designs. Public Library of Science 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9246232/ /pubmed/35771796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269363 Text en © 2022 Zhu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhu, Mengyao Bao, Defu Yu, Yuxiang Shen, Danni Yi, Minzhe Differences in thinking flexibility between novices and experts based on eye tracking |
title | Differences in thinking flexibility between novices and experts based on eye tracking |
title_full | Differences in thinking flexibility between novices and experts based on eye tracking |
title_fullStr | Differences in thinking flexibility between novices and experts based on eye tracking |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in thinking flexibility between novices and experts based on eye tracking |
title_short | Differences in thinking flexibility between novices and experts based on eye tracking |
title_sort | differences in thinking flexibility between novices and experts based on eye tracking |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9246232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35771796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269363 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhumengyao differencesinthinkingflexibilitybetweennovicesandexpertsbasedoneyetracking AT baodefu differencesinthinkingflexibilitybetweennovicesandexpertsbasedoneyetracking AT yuyuxiang differencesinthinkingflexibilitybetweennovicesandexpertsbasedoneyetracking AT shendanni differencesinthinkingflexibilitybetweennovicesandexpertsbasedoneyetracking AT yiminzhe differencesinthinkingflexibilitybetweennovicesandexpertsbasedoneyetracking |