Cargando…

The Prognostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT Metabolic Parameters in Predicting Treatment Response Before EGFR TKI Treatment in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES: This study makes a retrospective examination of exploring the prognostic value of (18)fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) related metabolic-volumetric variables, nutritional status, and immune and inflammatory markers on progr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agüloğlu, Nurşin, Akyol, Murat, Kömek, Halil, Katgı, Nuran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9246300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770976
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.24650
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: This study makes a retrospective examination of exploring the prognostic value of (18)fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) related metabolic-volumetric variables, nutritional status, and immune and inflammatory markers on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in advanced adenocarcinoma patients with positive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations undergoing EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. METHODS: A retrospective examination was made of patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging for staging maximum four weeks before starting treatment, between January 2015 and July 2020. Included in the study were 68 patients identified histopathologically to have locally advanced/metastatic EGFR mutation-positive adenocarcinoma, and who underwent EGFR TKI therapy. The laboratory data of the patients, obtained 15 days before imaging performed for PET/CT staging, were evaluated. RESULTS: Metabolic tumor volume, modified Glasgow prognostic score and locally advanced disease were identified as independent prognostic parameters for PFS (p=0.004, p=0.029, p=0.016, respectively). A univariate Cox regression analysis revealed albumin/alkaline phosphatase and tumor size to be significant parameters for prognosis (p=0.033, p=0.043, respectively). A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that none of the parameters were predictive or OS. CONCLUSION: The parameters of (18)F-FDG PET/CT, especially the volumetric parameters, were found to be strong prognostic factors with statistical significance for predicting PFS. We believe that these parameters are important prognostic markers that should be evaluated together in the management and follow-up of patients with EGFR mutation-positive adenocarcinoma.