Cargando…

Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaires: Exploring Responsiveness and Diagnostic Performance in a Sample of Outpatients with and without Hand and Wrist Complaints

Objective  The present study aimed to verify whether, in an adult population with nontraumatic complaints in the upper limbs, (1) the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) are susceptible to a “ceiling effect” when compared w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe de, Faria, Jamile Caroline Velasques, Fernandes, Marcela, Raduan-Neto, Jorge, Okamura, Aldo, Belloti, João Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9246537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35785113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1724071
_version_ 1784738991225962496
author Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe de
Faria, Jamile Caroline Velasques
Fernandes, Marcela
Raduan-Neto, Jorge
Okamura, Aldo
Belloti, João Carlos
author_facet Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe de
Faria, Jamile Caroline Velasques
Fernandes, Marcela
Raduan-Neto, Jorge
Okamura, Aldo
Belloti, João Carlos
author_sort Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe de
collection PubMed
description Objective  The present study aimed to verify whether, in an adult population with nontraumatic complaints in the upper limbs, (1) the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) are susceptible to a “ceiling effect” when compared with a sample of healthy subjects; and (2) to determine cutoff points for diagnostic performance and the intercorrelation for DASH and MHQ in both samples. Methods  This was a prospective, comparative, nonrandomized study. In total, 150 subjects were included, with 75 in the case group (with disease) and 75 in the control group (without disease). This was a sample of patients recently admitted to a hand surgery outpatient clinic. Controls were matched to clinical cases according to inclusion. The ceiling effect was determined by a maximum response rate (> 15%); receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves determined cutoff points for sickness definition, and DASH and MHQ sensitivity and specificity. Statistical significance was set at p  < 0.05. Results  The DASH and MHQ questionnaires had no ceiling effect for the case group. In this group, 18 (24%) patients had the maximum DASH score, but none (0%) had the maximum MHQ score. For the control group, 1 (1.33%) subject had the maximum DASH score, but none scored for MHQ. For case determination, DASH scores of 7.1 had 80% sensitivity and 60.3% specificity, whereas MHQ scores of 76.9 had 56.2% sensitivity and 97.3% specificity. Conclusion  The DASH and MHQ questionnaires are reliable tools to measure the impact of hand and wrist morbidities on daily activities, and they are not susceptible to ceiling effects. The DASH questionnaire is more sensitive for patient identification, whereas the MHQ is more specific. As such, the MHQ seems more appropriate when a more specific functional increase is expected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9246537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92465372022-07-01 Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaires: Exploring Responsiveness and Diagnostic Performance in a Sample of Outpatients with and without Hand and Wrist Complaints Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe de Faria, Jamile Caroline Velasques Fernandes, Marcela Raduan-Neto, Jorge Okamura, Aldo Belloti, João Carlos Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Objective  The present study aimed to verify whether, in an adult population with nontraumatic complaints in the upper limbs, (1) the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) are susceptible to a “ceiling effect” when compared with a sample of healthy subjects; and (2) to determine cutoff points for diagnostic performance and the intercorrelation for DASH and MHQ in both samples. Methods  This was a prospective, comparative, nonrandomized study. In total, 150 subjects were included, with 75 in the case group (with disease) and 75 in the control group (without disease). This was a sample of patients recently admitted to a hand surgery outpatient clinic. Controls were matched to clinical cases according to inclusion. The ceiling effect was determined by a maximum response rate (> 15%); receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves determined cutoff points for sickness definition, and DASH and MHQ sensitivity and specificity. Statistical significance was set at p  < 0.05. Results  The DASH and MHQ questionnaires had no ceiling effect for the case group. In this group, 18 (24%) patients had the maximum DASH score, but none (0%) had the maximum MHQ score. For the control group, 1 (1.33%) subject had the maximum DASH score, but none scored for MHQ. For case determination, DASH scores of 7.1 had 80% sensitivity and 60.3% specificity, whereas MHQ scores of 76.9 had 56.2% sensitivity and 97.3% specificity. Conclusion  The DASH and MHQ questionnaires are reliable tools to measure the impact of hand and wrist morbidities on daily activities, and they are not susceptible to ceiling effects. The DASH questionnaire is more sensitive for patient identification, whereas the MHQ is more specific. As such, the MHQ seems more appropriate when a more specific functional increase is expected. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9246537/ /pubmed/35785113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1724071 Text en Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Moraes, Vinícius Ynoe de
Faria, Jamile Caroline Velasques
Fernandes, Marcela
Raduan-Neto, Jorge
Okamura, Aldo
Belloti, João Carlos
Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaires: Exploring Responsiveness and Diagnostic Performance in a Sample of Outpatients with and without Hand and Wrist Complaints
title Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaires: Exploring Responsiveness and Diagnostic Performance in a Sample of Outpatients with and without Hand and Wrist Complaints
title_full Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaires: Exploring Responsiveness and Diagnostic Performance in a Sample of Outpatients with and without Hand and Wrist Complaints
title_fullStr Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaires: Exploring Responsiveness and Diagnostic Performance in a Sample of Outpatients with and without Hand and Wrist Complaints
title_full_unstemmed Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaires: Exploring Responsiveness and Diagnostic Performance in a Sample of Outpatients with and without Hand and Wrist Complaints
title_short Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaires: Exploring Responsiveness and Diagnostic Performance in a Sample of Outpatients with and without Hand and Wrist Complaints
title_sort disability of arm, shoulder and hand and michigan hand outcomes questionnaires: exploring responsiveness and diagnostic performance in a sample of outpatients with and without hand and wrist complaints
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9246537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35785113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1724071
work_keys_str_mv AT moraesviniciusynoede disabilityofarmshoulderandhandandmichiganhandoutcomesquestionnairesexploringresponsivenessanddiagnosticperformanceinasampleofoutpatientswithandwithouthandandwristcomplaints
AT fariajamilecarolinevelasques disabilityofarmshoulderandhandandmichiganhandoutcomesquestionnairesexploringresponsivenessanddiagnosticperformanceinasampleofoutpatientswithandwithouthandandwristcomplaints
AT fernandesmarcela disabilityofarmshoulderandhandandmichiganhandoutcomesquestionnairesexploringresponsivenessanddiagnosticperformanceinasampleofoutpatientswithandwithouthandandwristcomplaints
AT raduannetojorge disabilityofarmshoulderandhandandmichiganhandoutcomesquestionnairesexploringresponsivenessanddiagnosticperformanceinasampleofoutpatientswithandwithouthandandwristcomplaints
AT okamuraaldo disabilityofarmshoulderandhandandmichiganhandoutcomesquestionnairesexploringresponsivenessanddiagnosticperformanceinasampleofoutpatientswithandwithouthandandwristcomplaints
AT bellotijoaocarlos disabilityofarmshoulderandhandandmichiganhandoutcomesquestionnairesexploringresponsivenessanddiagnosticperformanceinasampleofoutpatientswithandwithouthandandwristcomplaints