Cargando…
A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques
Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis caused by Ehrlichia canis infection is a life-threatening vector-borne disease in dogs worldwide. Routine blood smear has very low sensitivity and cannot accurately provide a quantitative result. Conventional PCR (cPCR) and real-time PCR (qPCR) are widely used as molecu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9246678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35473801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.22-0086 |
_version_ | 1784739016327823360 |
---|---|
author | WICHIANCHOT, Sakulchit HONGSRICHAN, Nuttanan MANEERUTTANARUNGROJ, Cherdsak PINLAOR, Somchai IAMROD, Kantapong PURISARN, Andaman DONTHAISONG, Peerawich KARANIS, Panagiotis NIMSUPHAN, Burin RUCKSAKEN, Rucksak |
author_facet | WICHIANCHOT, Sakulchit HONGSRICHAN, Nuttanan MANEERUTTANARUNGROJ, Cherdsak PINLAOR, Somchai IAMROD, Kantapong PURISARN, Andaman DONTHAISONG, Peerawich KARANIS, Panagiotis NIMSUPHAN, Burin RUCKSAKEN, Rucksak |
author_sort | WICHIANCHOT, Sakulchit |
collection | PubMed |
description | Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis caused by Ehrlichia canis infection is a life-threatening vector-borne disease in dogs worldwide. Routine blood smear has very low sensitivity and cannot accurately provide a quantitative result. Conventional PCR (cPCR) and real-time PCR (qPCR) are widely used as molecular methods for E. canis detection. qPCR is quantitative but relies on standard curves of known samples. To overcome this difficulty, this study developed a new E. canis quantitative detection method, using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). ddPCR was evaluated against cPCR and blood smears. PCR amplicons and genomic DNA (gDNA) from 12 microscopic positive samples were used to identify the limits of detection (LODs) in ddPCR and cPCR. Our ddPCR was assessed in 92 field samples, it was compared with cPCR and blood smears. ddPCR showed LOD=1.6 copies/reaction, or 78 times more sensitive than cPCR (LOD=126 copies/reaction), using PCR amplicons as a template, whereas both ddPCR and cPCR had equal LODs at 0.02 ng gDNA/reaction. In addition, ddPCR had 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity for E. canis detection compared to cPCR and no cross-reaction with other blood pathogens was observed. ddPCR identified more positive samples than cPCR and blood smear. ddPCR improved the overall performance of E. canis detection, with a better LOD and comparable sensitivity and specificity to cPCR. The technique might be helpful for diagnosis of E. canis in light infection, evaluating the number of E. canis and follow-up after treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9246678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92466782022-07-09 A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques WICHIANCHOT, Sakulchit HONGSRICHAN, Nuttanan MANEERUTTANARUNGROJ, Cherdsak PINLAOR, Somchai IAMROD, Kantapong PURISARN, Andaman DONTHAISONG, Peerawich KARANIS, Panagiotis NIMSUPHAN, Burin RUCKSAKEN, Rucksak J Vet Med Sci Parasitology Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis caused by Ehrlichia canis infection is a life-threatening vector-borne disease in dogs worldwide. Routine blood smear has very low sensitivity and cannot accurately provide a quantitative result. Conventional PCR (cPCR) and real-time PCR (qPCR) are widely used as molecular methods for E. canis detection. qPCR is quantitative but relies on standard curves of known samples. To overcome this difficulty, this study developed a new E. canis quantitative detection method, using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). ddPCR was evaluated against cPCR and blood smears. PCR amplicons and genomic DNA (gDNA) from 12 microscopic positive samples were used to identify the limits of detection (LODs) in ddPCR and cPCR. Our ddPCR was assessed in 92 field samples, it was compared with cPCR and blood smears. ddPCR showed LOD=1.6 copies/reaction, or 78 times more sensitive than cPCR (LOD=126 copies/reaction), using PCR amplicons as a template, whereas both ddPCR and cPCR had equal LODs at 0.02 ng gDNA/reaction. In addition, ddPCR had 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity for E. canis detection compared to cPCR and no cross-reaction with other blood pathogens was observed. ddPCR identified more positive samples than cPCR and blood smear. ddPCR improved the overall performance of E. canis detection, with a better LOD and comparable sensitivity and specificity to cPCR. The technique might be helpful for diagnosis of E. canis in light infection, evaluating the number of E. canis and follow-up after treatment. The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2022-04-27 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9246678/ /pubmed/35473801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.22-0086 Text en ©2022 The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Parasitology WICHIANCHOT, Sakulchit HONGSRICHAN, Nuttanan MANEERUTTANARUNGROJ, Cherdsak PINLAOR, Somchai IAMROD, Kantapong PURISARN, Andaman DONTHAISONG, Peerawich KARANIS, Panagiotis NIMSUPHAN, Burin RUCKSAKEN, Rucksak A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques |
title | A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis
detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques |
title_full | A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis
detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques |
title_fullStr | A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis
detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis
detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques |
title_short | A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis
detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques |
title_sort | newly developed droplet digital pcr for ehrlichia canis
detection: comparisons to conventional pcr and blood smear techniques |
topic | Parasitology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9246678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35473801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.22-0086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wichianchotsakulchit anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT hongsrichannuttanan anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT maneeruttanarungrojcherdsak anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT pinlaorsomchai anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT iamrodkantapong anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT purisarnandaman anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT donthaisongpeerawich anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT karanispanagiotis anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT nimsuphanburin anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT rucksakenrucksak anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT wichianchotsakulchit newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT hongsrichannuttanan newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT maneeruttanarungrojcherdsak newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT pinlaorsomchai newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT iamrodkantapong newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT purisarnandaman newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT donthaisongpeerawich newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT karanispanagiotis newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT nimsuphanburin newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques AT rucksakenrucksak newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques |