Cargando…

A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques

Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis caused by Ehrlichia canis infection is a life-threatening vector-borne disease in dogs worldwide. Routine blood smear has very low sensitivity and cannot accurately provide a quantitative result. Conventional PCR (cPCR) and real-time PCR (qPCR) are widely used as molecu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: WICHIANCHOT, Sakulchit, HONGSRICHAN, Nuttanan, MANEERUTTANARUNGROJ, Cherdsak, PINLAOR, Somchai, IAMROD, Kantapong, PURISARN, Andaman, DONTHAISONG, Peerawich, KARANIS, Panagiotis, NIMSUPHAN, Burin, RUCKSAKEN, Rucksak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9246678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35473801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.22-0086
_version_ 1784739016327823360
author WICHIANCHOT, Sakulchit
HONGSRICHAN, Nuttanan
MANEERUTTANARUNGROJ, Cherdsak
PINLAOR, Somchai
IAMROD, Kantapong
PURISARN, Andaman
DONTHAISONG, Peerawich
KARANIS, Panagiotis
NIMSUPHAN, Burin
RUCKSAKEN, Rucksak
author_facet WICHIANCHOT, Sakulchit
HONGSRICHAN, Nuttanan
MANEERUTTANARUNGROJ, Cherdsak
PINLAOR, Somchai
IAMROD, Kantapong
PURISARN, Andaman
DONTHAISONG, Peerawich
KARANIS, Panagiotis
NIMSUPHAN, Burin
RUCKSAKEN, Rucksak
author_sort WICHIANCHOT, Sakulchit
collection PubMed
description Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis caused by Ehrlichia canis infection is a life-threatening vector-borne disease in dogs worldwide. Routine blood smear has very low sensitivity and cannot accurately provide a quantitative result. Conventional PCR (cPCR) and real-time PCR (qPCR) are widely used as molecular methods for E. canis detection. qPCR is quantitative but relies on standard curves of known samples. To overcome this difficulty, this study developed a new E. canis quantitative detection method, using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). ddPCR was evaluated against cPCR and blood smears. PCR amplicons and genomic DNA (gDNA) from 12 microscopic positive samples were used to identify the limits of detection (LODs) in ddPCR and cPCR. Our ddPCR was assessed in 92 field samples, it was compared with cPCR and blood smears. ddPCR showed LOD=1.6 copies/reaction, or 78 times more sensitive than cPCR (LOD=126 copies/reaction), using PCR amplicons as a template, whereas both ddPCR and cPCR had equal LODs at 0.02 ng gDNA/reaction. In addition, ddPCR had 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity for E. canis detection compared to cPCR and no cross-reaction with other blood pathogens was observed. ddPCR identified more positive samples than cPCR and blood smear. ddPCR improved the overall performance of E. canis detection, with a better LOD and comparable sensitivity and specificity to cPCR. The technique might be helpful for diagnosis of E. canis in light infection, evaluating the number of E. canis and follow-up after treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9246678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92466782022-07-09 A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques WICHIANCHOT, Sakulchit HONGSRICHAN, Nuttanan MANEERUTTANARUNGROJ, Cherdsak PINLAOR, Somchai IAMROD, Kantapong PURISARN, Andaman DONTHAISONG, Peerawich KARANIS, Panagiotis NIMSUPHAN, Burin RUCKSAKEN, Rucksak J Vet Med Sci Parasitology Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis caused by Ehrlichia canis infection is a life-threatening vector-borne disease in dogs worldwide. Routine blood smear has very low sensitivity and cannot accurately provide a quantitative result. Conventional PCR (cPCR) and real-time PCR (qPCR) are widely used as molecular methods for E. canis detection. qPCR is quantitative but relies on standard curves of known samples. To overcome this difficulty, this study developed a new E. canis quantitative detection method, using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). ddPCR was evaluated against cPCR and blood smears. PCR amplicons and genomic DNA (gDNA) from 12 microscopic positive samples were used to identify the limits of detection (LODs) in ddPCR and cPCR. Our ddPCR was assessed in 92 field samples, it was compared with cPCR and blood smears. ddPCR showed LOD=1.6 copies/reaction, or 78 times more sensitive than cPCR (LOD=126 copies/reaction), using PCR amplicons as a template, whereas both ddPCR and cPCR had equal LODs at 0.02 ng gDNA/reaction. In addition, ddPCR had 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity for E. canis detection compared to cPCR and no cross-reaction with other blood pathogens was observed. ddPCR identified more positive samples than cPCR and blood smear. ddPCR improved the overall performance of E. canis detection, with a better LOD and comparable sensitivity and specificity to cPCR. The technique might be helpful for diagnosis of E. canis in light infection, evaluating the number of E. canis and follow-up after treatment. The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2022-04-27 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9246678/ /pubmed/35473801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.22-0086 Text en ©2022 The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Parasitology
WICHIANCHOT, Sakulchit
HONGSRICHAN, Nuttanan
MANEERUTTANARUNGROJ, Cherdsak
PINLAOR, Somchai
IAMROD, Kantapong
PURISARN, Andaman
DONTHAISONG, Peerawich
KARANIS, Panagiotis
NIMSUPHAN, Burin
RUCKSAKEN, Rucksak
A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques
title A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques
title_full A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques
title_fullStr A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques
title_full_unstemmed A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques
title_short A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis detection: comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques
title_sort newly developed droplet digital pcr for ehrlichia canis detection: comparisons to conventional pcr and blood smear techniques
topic Parasitology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9246678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35473801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.22-0086
work_keys_str_mv AT wichianchotsakulchit anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT hongsrichannuttanan anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT maneeruttanarungrojcherdsak anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT pinlaorsomchai anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT iamrodkantapong anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT purisarnandaman anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT donthaisongpeerawich anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT karanispanagiotis anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT nimsuphanburin anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT rucksakenrucksak anewlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT wichianchotsakulchit newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT hongsrichannuttanan newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT maneeruttanarungrojcherdsak newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT pinlaorsomchai newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT iamrodkantapong newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT purisarnandaman newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT donthaisongpeerawich newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT karanispanagiotis newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT nimsuphanburin newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques
AT rucksakenrucksak newlydevelopeddropletdigitalpcrforehrlichiacanisdetectioncomparisonstoconventionalpcrandbloodsmeartechniques