Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method With Two Commercially Available Systems for Colistin Susceptibility Testing Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Single-Center Exploratory Study

Purpose: The purpose is to explore the diagnostic utility of colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) as a simple and reliable method of colistin susceptibility testing. Materials and methods: An exploratory study was undertaken in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Uttarakhand, from September 2021 to M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Arpana, Bhatia, Mohit, Rekha, Sasi, Rani, Diksha, Kamboj, Pratiksha, Chakraborty, Deepika, Gupta, Pratima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9246699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783894
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25549
_version_ 1784739021403979776
author Singh, Arpana
Bhatia, Mohit
Rekha, Sasi
Rani, Diksha
Kamboj, Pratiksha
Chakraborty, Deepika
Gupta, Pratima
author_facet Singh, Arpana
Bhatia, Mohit
Rekha, Sasi
Rani, Diksha
Kamboj, Pratiksha
Chakraborty, Deepika
Gupta, Pratima
author_sort Singh, Arpana
collection PubMed
description Purpose: The purpose is to explore the diagnostic utility of colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) as a simple and reliable method of colistin susceptibility testing. Materials and methods: An exploratory study was undertaken in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Uttarakhand, from September 2021 to March 2022, after obtaining approval from the Institute Ethics Committee. Twenty-five non-repetitive carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates were included in the study. Matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and BD Phoenix M50 system were used to perform species-level identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), respectively, as per the manufacturer’s instructions. AST results (including those of colistin) were interpreted as per the CLSI guidelines 2022. The test isolates were further subjected to additional in vitro colistin susceptibility testing using a commercially available Mikrolatest colistin susceptibility testing kit and CBDE, respectively. Results: The in vitro colistin resistance rates varied from 8% by BD Phoenix system to 20% by Mikrolatest kit and 32% by CBDE, respectively. For colistin susceptibility, a higher CA was observed between the BD Phoenix system and CBDE (64.71%) than between the Mikrolatest kit and CBDE (31.60%). Overall, a statistically significant fair agreement was observed between the BD Phoenix system and CBDE (Kappa: 0.312; 95% CI: 0.036 to 0.660) and Mikrolatest MIC colistin kit and CBDE (Kappa: 0.286; 95% CI: 0.111 to 0.683), respectively. Conclusions: In vitro colistin testing remains a significant challenge globally. Although the present study results are inconclusive due to the small sample size, we should conduct multi-centric studies globally, taking a considerable sample size representing different Gram-negative bacilli to generate conclusive evidence on the utility of CBDE as a reliable method of colistin susceptibility testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9246699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92466992022-07-02 Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method With Two Commercially Available Systems for Colistin Susceptibility Testing Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Single-Center Exploratory Study Singh, Arpana Bhatia, Mohit Rekha, Sasi Rani, Diksha Kamboj, Pratiksha Chakraborty, Deepika Gupta, Pratima Cureus Pathology Purpose: The purpose is to explore the diagnostic utility of colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) as a simple and reliable method of colistin susceptibility testing. Materials and methods: An exploratory study was undertaken in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Uttarakhand, from September 2021 to March 2022, after obtaining approval from the Institute Ethics Committee. Twenty-five non-repetitive carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates were included in the study. Matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and BD Phoenix M50 system were used to perform species-level identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), respectively, as per the manufacturer’s instructions. AST results (including those of colistin) were interpreted as per the CLSI guidelines 2022. The test isolates were further subjected to additional in vitro colistin susceptibility testing using a commercially available Mikrolatest colistin susceptibility testing kit and CBDE, respectively. Results: The in vitro colistin resistance rates varied from 8% by BD Phoenix system to 20% by Mikrolatest kit and 32% by CBDE, respectively. For colistin susceptibility, a higher CA was observed between the BD Phoenix system and CBDE (64.71%) than between the Mikrolatest kit and CBDE (31.60%). Overall, a statistically significant fair agreement was observed between the BD Phoenix system and CBDE (Kappa: 0.312; 95% CI: 0.036 to 0.660) and Mikrolatest MIC colistin kit and CBDE (Kappa: 0.286; 95% CI: 0.111 to 0.683), respectively. Conclusions: In vitro colistin testing remains a significant challenge globally. Although the present study results are inconclusive due to the small sample size, we should conduct multi-centric studies globally, taking a considerable sample size representing different Gram-negative bacilli to generate conclusive evidence on the utility of CBDE as a reliable method of colistin susceptibility testing. Cureus 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9246699/ /pubmed/35783894 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25549 Text en Copyright © 2022, Singh et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Pathology
Singh, Arpana
Bhatia, Mohit
Rekha, Sasi
Rani, Diksha
Kamboj, Pratiksha
Chakraborty, Deepika
Gupta, Pratima
Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method With Two Commercially Available Systems for Colistin Susceptibility Testing Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Single-Center Exploratory Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method With Two Commercially Available Systems for Colistin Susceptibility Testing Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Single-Center Exploratory Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method With Two Commercially Available Systems for Colistin Susceptibility Testing Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Single-Center Exploratory Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method With Two Commercially Available Systems for Colistin Susceptibility Testing Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Single-Center Exploratory Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method With Two Commercially Available Systems for Colistin Susceptibility Testing Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Single-Center Exploratory Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method With Two Commercially Available Systems for Colistin Susceptibility Testing Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Single-Center Exploratory Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of colistin broth disk elution method with two commercially available systems for colistin susceptibility testing against carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae: a single-center exploratory study
topic Pathology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9246699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783894
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25549
work_keys_str_mv AT singharpana comparativeevaluationofcolistinbrothdiskelutionmethodwithtwocommerciallyavailablesystemsforcolistinsusceptibilitytestingagainstcarbapenemresistantklebsiellapneumoniaeasinglecenterexploratorystudy
AT bhatiamohit comparativeevaluationofcolistinbrothdiskelutionmethodwithtwocommerciallyavailablesystemsforcolistinsusceptibilitytestingagainstcarbapenemresistantklebsiellapneumoniaeasinglecenterexploratorystudy
AT rekhasasi comparativeevaluationofcolistinbrothdiskelutionmethodwithtwocommerciallyavailablesystemsforcolistinsusceptibilitytestingagainstcarbapenemresistantklebsiellapneumoniaeasinglecenterexploratorystudy
AT ranidiksha comparativeevaluationofcolistinbrothdiskelutionmethodwithtwocommerciallyavailablesystemsforcolistinsusceptibilitytestingagainstcarbapenemresistantklebsiellapneumoniaeasinglecenterexploratorystudy
AT kambojpratiksha comparativeevaluationofcolistinbrothdiskelutionmethodwithtwocommerciallyavailablesystemsforcolistinsusceptibilitytestingagainstcarbapenemresistantklebsiellapneumoniaeasinglecenterexploratorystudy
AT chakrabortydeepika comparativeevaluationofcolistinbrothdiskelutionmethodwithtwocommerciallyavailablesystemsforcolistinsusceptibilitytestingagainstcarbapenemresistantklebsiellapneumoniaeasinglecenterexploratorystudy
AT guptapratima comparativeevaluationofcolistinbrothdiskelutionmethodwithtwocommerciallyavailablesystemsforcolistinsusceptibilitytestingagainstcarbapenemresistantklebsiellapneumoniaeasinglecenterexploratorystudy