Cargando…

Quantum decision making in automatic driving

The behavior intention estimation and interaction between Autonomous Vehicles (AV) and human traffic participants are the key problems in Automatic Driving System (ADS). When the classical decision theory studies implicitly assume that the behavior of human traffic participants is completely rationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Qingyuan, Fu, Weiping, Wang, Wen, Sun, Yuan, Wang, Denggui, Zhou, Jincao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14737-2
_version_ 1784739062177857536
author Song, Qingyuan
Fu, Weiping
Wang, Wen
Sun, Yuan
Wang, Denggui
Zhou, Jincao
author_facet Song, Qingyuan
Fu, Weiping
Wang, Wen
Sun, Yuan
Wang, Denggui
Zhou, Jincao
author_sort Song, Qingyuan
collection PubMed
description The behavior intention estimation and interaction between Autonomous Vehicles (AV) and human traffic participants are the key problems in Automatic Driving System (ADS). When the classical decision theory studies implicitly assume that the behavior of human traffic participants is completely rational. However, according to the booming quantum decision theory in recent years and actual traffic cases, traffic behaviors and other human behaviors are often irrational and violate the assumptions of classical cognitive and decision theory. This paper explores the decision-making problem in the two-car game scene based on quantum decision theory and compares it with the current mainstream method of studying irrational behavior-Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) model. The comparative analysis proved that the Quantum Game Theory (QGT) model can explain the separation effect which the classical probability model can’t reveal, and it has more advantages than CPT model in dealing with game scene decision-making. When two cars interact with each other, the QGT model can consider the interests of both sides from the perspective of the other car. Compared with the classical probability model and CPT model, the QGT is more realistic in the behavior decision-making of ADS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9247013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92470132022-07-02 Quantum decision making in automatic driving Song, Qingyuan Fu, Weiping Wang, Wen Sun, Yuan Wang, Denggui Zhou, Jincao Sci Rep Article The behavior intention estimation and interaction between Autonomous Vehicles (AV) and human traffic participants are the key problems in Automatic Driving System (ADS). When the classical decision theory studies implicitly assume that the behavior of human traffic participants is completely rational. However, according to the booming quantum decision theory in recent years and actual traffic cases, traffic behaviors and other human behaviors are often irrational and violate the assumptions of classical cognitive and decision theory. This paper explores the decision-making problem in the two-car game scene based on quantum decision theory and compares it with the current mainstream method of studying irrational behavior-Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) model. The comparative analysis proved that the Quantum Game Theory (QGT) model can explain the separation effect which the classical probability model can’t reveal, and it has more advantages than CPT model in dealing with game scene decision-making. When two cars interact with each other, the QGT model can consider the interests of both sides from the perspective of the other car. Compared with the classical probability model and CPT model, the QGT is more realistic in the behavior decision-making of ADS. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9247013/ /pubmed/35773460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14737-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Song, Qingyuan
Fu, Weiping
Wang, Wen
Sun, Yuan
Wang, Denggui
Zhou, Jincao
Quantum decision making in automatic driving
title Quantum decision making in automatic driving
title_full Quantum decision making in automatic driving
title_fullStr Quantum decision making in automatic driving
title_full_unstemmed Quantum decision making in automatic driving
title_short Quantum decision making in automatic driving
title_sort quantum decision making in automatic driving
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14737-2
work_keys_str_mv AT songqingyuan quantumdecisionmakinginautomaticdriving
AT fuweiping quantumdecisionmakinginautomaticdriving
AT wangwen quantumdecisionmakinginautomaticdriving
AT sunyuan quantumdecisionmakinginautomaticdriving
AT wangdenggui quantumdecisionmakinginautomaticdriving
AT zhoujincao quantumdecisionmakinginautomaticdriving