Cargando…

eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages

Fish diversity, an important indicator of the health of aquatic ecosystems, is declining sharply due to water pollution, overfishing, climate change, and species invasion. For protecting fish diversity, effective surveying and monitoring are prerequisites. In this study, eDNA (environmental DNA) met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Mei, Xiao, Nengwen, Zhao, Ziyi, Guo, Ningning, Luo, Zunlan, Sun, Guang, Li, Junsheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15488-w
_version_ 1784739075004039168
author Shen, Mei
Xiao, Nengwen
Zhao, Ziyi
Guo, Ningning
Luo, Zunlan
Sun, Guang
Li, Junsheng
author_facet Shen, Mei
Xiao, Nengwen
Zhao, Ziyi
Guo, Ningning
Luo, Zunlan
Sun, Guang
Li, Junsheng
author_sort Shen, Mei
collection PubMed
description Fish diversity, an important indicator of the health of aquatic ecosystems, is declining sharply due to water pollution, overfishing, climate change, and species invasion. For protecting fish diversity, effective surveying and monitoring are prerequisites. In this study, eDNA (environmental DNA) metabarcoding and ground cages were used to survey the fish diversity of the Chaobai and Beiyun Rivers in Beijing. Based on the two methods, we identified 40 species, belonging to 35 genera, 18 families, and six orders. The richness of fish identified by eDNA metabarcoding was significantly higher than that captured by ground cages in both rivers. The fish captured by the ground cage method were all recognized by eDNA metabarcoding, except Squalidus wolterstorffi and Saurogobio dabryi, which were captured only in ground cages. The correlation of relative abundance between the two methods was affected by the properties of the rivers, such as the flow rate. Fish caught by ground cage in the Beiyun River were identified by eDNA, but not in the Chaobai River. Our results also suggest that the Chaobai River has higher fish diversity than the Beiyun River and different community assemblage. In addition to differences in the natural properties of the focal rivers, the development of urbanization is also an important contributor to different community structures overserved. eDNA metabarcoding as a new survey tool has great application prospects, it provides certain theoretical data and methodological references for the protection and management of river fish diversity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9247089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92470892022-07-02 eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages Shen, Mei Xiao, Nengwen Zhao, Ziyi Guo, Ningning Luo, Zunlan Sun, Guang Li, Junsheng Sci Rep Article Fish diversity, an important indicator of the health of aquatic ecosystems, is declining sharply due to water pollution, overfishing, climate change, and species invasion. For protecting fish diversity, effective surveying and monitoring are prerequisites. In this study, eDNA (environmental DNA) metabarcoding and ground cages were used to survey the fish diversity of the Chaobai and Beiyun Rivers in Beijing. Based on the two methods, we identified 40 species, belonging to 35 genera, 18 families, and six orders. The richness of fish identified by eDNA metabarcoding was significantly higher than that captured by ground cages in both rivers. The fish captured by the ground cage method were all recognized by eDNA metabarcoding, except Squalidus wolterstorffi and Saurogobio dabryi, which were captured only in ground cages. The correlation of relative abundance between the two methods was affected by the properties of the rivers, such as the flow rate. Fish caught by ground cage in the Beiyun River were identified by eDNA, but not in the Chaobai River. Our results also suggest that the Chaobai River has higher fish diversity than the Beiyun River and different community assemblage. In addition to differences in the natural properties of the focal rivers, the development of urbanization is also an important contributor to different community structures overserved. eDNA metabarcoding as a new survey tool has great application prospects, it provides certain theoretical data and methodological references for the protection and management of river fish diversity. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9247089/ /pubmed/35773335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15488-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Shen, Mei
Xiao, Nengwen
Zhao, Ziyi
Guo, Ningning
Luo, Zunlan
Sun, Guang
Li, Junsheng
eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages
title eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages
title_full eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages
title_fullStr eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages
title_full_unstemmed eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages
title_short eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages
title_sort edna metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in beijing water systems compared with ground cages
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15488-w
work_keys_str_mv AT shenmei ednametabarcodingasapromisingconservationtooltomonitorfishdiversityinbeijingwatersystemscomparedwithgroundcages
AT xiaonengwen ednametabarcodingasapromisingconservationtooltomonitorfishdiversityinbeijingwatersystemscomparedwithgroundcages
AT zhaoziyi ednametabarcodingasapromisingconservationtooltomonitorfishdiversityinbeijingwatersystemscomparedwithgroundcages
AT guoningning ednametabarcodingasapromisingconservationtooltomonitorfishdiversityinbeijingwatersystemscomparedwithgroundcages
AT luozunlan ednametabarcodingasapromisingconservationtooltomonitorfishdiversityinbeijingwatersystemscomparedwithgroundcages
AT sunguang ednametabarcodingasapromisingconservationtooltomonitorfishdiversityinbeijingwatersystemscomparedwithgroundcages
AT lijunsheng ednametabarcodingasapromisingconservationtooltomonitorfishdiversityinbeijingwatersystemscomparedwithgroundcages