Cargando…

Rehabilitation Variability Following Osteochondral Autograft and Allograft Transplantation of the Knee

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the variability of postoperative rehabilitation protocols used by orthopedic surgery residency programs for osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) and osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) of the knee. DESIGN: Online postoperative OAT and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crowley, Stephen G., Pedersen, Anthony, Fortney, Thomas A., Swindell, Hasani W., Saltzman, Bryan M., Popkin, Charles A., Trofa, David P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35762400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19476035221093071
_version_ 1784739152083812352
author Crowley, Stephen G.
Pedersen, Anthony
Fortney, Thomas A.
Swindell, Hasani W.
Saltzman, Bryan M.
Popkin, Charles A.
Trofa, David P.
author_facet Crowley, Stephen G.
Pedersen, Anthony
Fortney, Thomas A.
Swindell, Hasani W.
Saltzman, Bryan M.
Popkin, Charles A.
Trofa, David P.
author_sort Crowley, Stephen G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the variability of postoperative rehabilitation protocols used by orthopedic surgery residency programs for osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) and osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) of the knee. DESIGN: Online postoperative OAT and OCA rehabilitation protocols from US orthopedic programs and the scientific literature were reviewed. A custom scoring rubric was developed to analyze each protocol for the presence of discrete rehabilitation modalities and the timing of each intervention. RESULTS: A total of 16 programs (10.3%) from 155 US academic orthopedic programs published online protocols and a total of 35 protocols were analyzed. Twenty-one protocols (88%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing following OAT and 17 protocols (100%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing following OCA. The average time protocols permitted weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) was 5.2 weeks (range = 0-8 weeks) following OAT and 6.2 weeks (range = 0-8 weeks) following OCA. There was considerable variation in the inclusion and timing of strength, proprioception, agility, and pivoting exercises. Following OAT, 2 protocols (8%) recommended functional testing as criteria for return to sport at an average time of 12.0 weeks (range = 12-24 weeks). Following OCA, 1 protocol (6%) recommended functional testing as criteria for return to sport at an average time of 12.0 weeks (range = 12-24 weeks). CONCLUSION: A minority of US academic orthopedic programs publish OAT and OCA rehabilitation protocols online. Among the protocols currently available, there is significant variability in the inclusion of specific rehabilitation components and timing of many modalities. Evidence-based standardization of elements of postoperative rehabilitation may help improve patient care and subsequent outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9247380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92473802022-07-02 Rehabilitation Variability Following Osteochondral Autograft and Allograft Transplantation of the Knee Crowley, Stephen G. Pedersen, Anthony Fortney, Thomas A. Swindell, Hasani W. Saltzman, Bryan M. Popkin, Charles A. Trofa, David P. Cartilage Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the variability of postoperative rehabilitation protocols used by orthopedic surgery residency programs for osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) and osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) of the knee. DESIGN: Online postoperative OAT and OCA rehabilitation protocols from US orthopedic programs and the scientific literature were reviewed. A custom scoring rubric was developed to analyze each protocol for the presence of discrete rehabilitation modalities and the timing of each intervention. RESULTS: A total of 16 programs (10.3%) from 155 US academic orthopedic programs published online protocols and a total of 35 protocols were analyzed. Twenty-one protocols (88%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing following OAT and 17 protocols (100%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing following OCA. The average time protocols permitted weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) was 5.2 weeks (range = 0-8 weeks) following OAT and 6.2 weeks (range = 0-8 weeks) following OCA. There was considerable variation in the inclusion and timing of strength, proprioception, agility, and pivoting exercises. Following OAT, 2 protocols (8%) recommended functional testing as criteria for return to sport at an average time of 12.0 weeks (range = 12-24 weeks). Following OCA, 1 protocol (6%) recommended functional testing as criteria for return to sport at an average time of 12.0 weeks (range = 12-24 weeks). CONCLUSION: A minority of US academic orthopedic programs publish OAT and OCA rehabilitation protocols online. Among the protocols currently available, there is significant variability in the inclusion of specific rehabilitation components and timing of many modalities. Evidence-based standardization of elements of postoperative rehabilitation may help improve patient care and subsequent outcomes. SAGE Publications 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9247380/ /pubmed/35762400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19476035221093071 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Crowley, Stephen G.
Pedersen, Anthony
Fortney, Thomas A.
Swindell, Hasani W.
Saltzman, Bryan M.
Popkin, Charles A.
Trofa, David P.
Rehabilitation Variability Following Osteochondral Autograft and Allograft Transplantation of the Knee
title Rehabilitation Variability Following Osteochondral Autograft and Allograft Transplantation of the Knee
title_full Rehabilitation Variability Following Osteochondral Autograft and Allograft Transplantation of the Knee
title_fullStr Rehabilitation Variability Following Osteochondral Autograft and Allograft Transplantation of the Knee
title_full_unstemmed Rehabilitation Variability Following Osteochondral Autograft and Allograft Transplantation of the Knee
title_short Rehabilitation Variability Following Osteochondral Autograft and Allograft Transplantation of the Knee
title_sort rehabilitation variability following osteochondral autograft and allograft transplantation of the knee
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35762400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19476035221093071
work_keys_str_mv AT crowleystepheng rehabilitationvariabilityfollowingosteochondralautograftandallografttransplantationoftheknee
AT pedersenanthony rehabilitationvariabilityfollowingosteochondralautograftandallografttransplantationoftheknee
AT fortneythomasa rehabilitationvariabilityfollowingosteochondralautograftandallografttransplantationoftheknee
AT swindellhasaniw rehabilitationvariabilityfollowingosteochondralautograftandallografttransplantationoftheknee
AT saltzmanbryanm rehabilitationvariabilityfollowingosteochondralautograftandallografttransplantationoftheknee
AT popkincharlesa rehabilitationvariabilityfollowingosteochondralautograftandallografttransplantationoftheknee
AT trofadavidp rehabilitationvariabilityfollowingosteochondralautograftandallografttransplantationoftheknee