Cargando…

Pattern of Recurrence of Glioblastoma Versus Grade 4 IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma Following Chemoradiation: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis

Background and Purpose: To quantitatively compare the recurrence patterns of glioblastoma (isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild type) versus grade 4 isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant astrocytoma (wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase, respectively) following primary chemoradi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stewart, James, Sahgal, Arjun, Chan, Aimee K M, Soliman, Hany, Tseng, Chia-Lin, Detsky, Jay, Myrehaug, Sten, Atenafu, Eshetu G, Helmi, Ali, Perry, James, Keith, Julia, Jane Lim-Fat, Mary, Munoz, David G, Zadeh, Gelareh, Shultz, David B, Das, Sunit, Coolens, Catherine, Alcaide-Leon, Paula, Maralani, Pejman Jabehdar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35762826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221109650
_version_ 1784739152587128832
author Stewart, James
Sahgal, Arjun
Chan, Aimee K M
Soliman, Hany
Tseng, Chia-Lin
Detsky, Jay
Myrehaug, Sten
Atenafu, Eshetu G
Helmi, Ali
Perry, James
Keith, Julia
Jane Lim-Fat, Mary
Munoz, David G
Zadeh, Gelareh
Shultz, David B
Das, Sunit
Coolens, Catherine
Alcaide-Leon, Paula
Maralani, Pejman Jabehdar
author_facet Stewart, James
Sahgal, Arjun
Chan, Aimee K M
Soliman, Hany
Tseng, Chia-Lin
Detsky, Jay
Myrehaug, Sten
Atenafu, Eshetu G
Helmi, Ali
Perry, James
Keith, Julia
Jane Lim-Fat, Mary
Munoz, David G
Zadeh, Gelareh
Shultz, David B
Das, Sunit
Coolens, Catherine
Alcaide-Leon, Paula
Maralani, Pejman Jabehdar
author_sort Stewart, James
collection PubMed
description Background and Purpose: To quantitatively compare the recurrence patterns of glioblastoma (isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild type) versus grade 4 isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant astrocytoma (wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase, respectively) following primary chemoradiation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective matched cohort of 22 wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and 22 mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients were matched by sex, extent of resection, and corpus callosum involvement. The recurrent gross tumor volume was compared to the original gross tumor volume and clinical target volume contours from radiotherapy planning. Failure patterns were quantified by the incidence and volume of the recurrent gross tumor volume outside the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume, and positional differences of the recurrent gross tumor volume centroid from the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume. Results: The gross tumor volume was smaller for wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase patients compared to the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase cohort (mean ± SD: 46.5 ± 26.0 cm(3) vs 72.2 ± 45.4 cm(3), P = .026). The recurrent gross tumor volume was 10.7 ± 26.9 cm(3) and 46.9 ± 55.0 cm(3) smaller than the gross tumor volume for the same groups (P = .018). The recurrent gross tumor volume extended outside the gross tumor volume in 22 (100%) and 15 (68%) (P= .009) of wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients, respectively; however, the volume of recurrent gross tumor volume outside the gross tumor volume was not significantly different (12.4 ± 16.1 cm(3) vs 8.4 ± 14.2 cm(3), P = .443). The recurrent gross tumor volume centroid was within 5.7 mm of the closest gross tumor volume edge for 21 (95%) and 22 (100%) of wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients, respectively. Conclusion: The recurrent gross tumor volume extended beyond the gross tumor volume less often in mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients possibly implying a differential response to chemoradiotherapy and suggesting isocitrate dehydrogenase status might be used to personalize radiotherapy. The results require validation in prospective randomized trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9247382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92473822022-07-02 Pattern of Recurrence of Glioblastoma Versus Grade 4 IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma Following Chemoradiation: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis Stewart, James Sahgal, Arjun Chan, Aimee K M Soliman, Hany Tseng, Chia-Lin Detsky, Jay Myrehaug, Sten Atenafu, Eshetu G Helmi, Ali Perry, James Keith, Julia Jane Lim-Fat, Mary Munoz, David G Zadeh, Gelareh Shultz, David B Das, Sunit Coolens, Catherine Alcaide-Leon, Paula Maralani, Pejman Jabehdar Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article Background and Purpose: To quantitatively compare the recurrence patterns of glioblastoma (isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild type) versus grade 4 isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant astrocytoma (wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase, respectively) following primary chemoradiation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective matched cohort of 22 wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and 22 mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients were matched by sex, extent of resection, and corpus callosum involvement. The recurrent gross tumor volume was compared to the original gross tumor volume and clinical target volume contours from radiotherapy planning. Failure patterns were quantified by the incidence and volume of the recurrent gross tumor volume outside the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume, and positional differences of the recurrent gross tumor volume centroid from the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume. Results: The gross tumor volume was smaller for wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase patients compared to the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase cohort (mean ± SD: 46.5 ± 26.0 cm(3) vs 72.2 ± 45.4 cm(3), P = .026). The recurrent gross tumor volume was 10.7 ± 26.9 cm(3) and 46.9 ± 55.0 cm(3) smaller than the gross tumor volume for the same groups (P = .018). The recurrent gross tumor volume extended outside the gross tumor volume in 22 (100%) and 15 (68%) (P= .009) of wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients, respectively; however, the volume of recurrent gross tumor volume outside the gross tumor volume was not significantly different (12.4 ± 16.1 cm(3) vs 8.4 ± 14.2 cm(3), P = .443). The recurrent gross tumor volume centroid was within 5.7 mm of the closest gross tumor volume edge for 21 (95%) and 22 (100%) of wild type isocitrate dehydrogenase and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients, respectively. Conclusion: The recurrent gross tumor volume extended beyond the gross tumor volume less often in mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase patients possibly implying a differential response to chemoradiotherapy and suggesting isocitrate dehydrogenase status might be used to personalize radiotherapy. The results require validation in prospective randomized trials. SAGE Publications 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9247382/ /pubmed/35762826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221109650 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Stewart, James
Sahgal, Arjun
Chan, Aimee K M
Soliman, Hany
Tseng, Chia-Lin
Detsky, Jay
Myrehaug, Sten
Atenafu, Eshetu G
Helmi, Ali
Perry, James
Keith, Julia
Jane Lim-Fat, Mary
Munoz, David G
Zadeh, Gelareh
Shultz, David B
Das, Sunit
Coolens, Catherine
Alcaide-Leon, Paula
Maralani, Pejman Jabehdar
Pattern of Recurrence of Glioblastoma Versus Grade 4 IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma Following Chemoradiation: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis
title Pattern of Recurrence of Glioblastoma Versus Grade 4 IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma Following Chemoradiation: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis
title_full Pattern of Recurrence of Glioblastoma Versus Grade 4 IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma Following Chemoradiation: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis
title_fullStr Pattern of Recurrence of Glioblastoma Versus Grade 4 IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma Following Chemoradiation: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pattern of Recurrence of Glioblastoma Versus Grade 4 IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma Following Chemoradiation: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis
title_short Pattern of Recurrence of Glioblastoma Versus Grade 4 IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma Following Chemoradiation: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis
title_sort pattern of recurrence of glioblastoma versus grade 4 idh-mutant astrocytoma following chemoradiation: a retrospective matched-cohort analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35762826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221109650
work_keys_str_mv AT stewartjames patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT sahgalarjun patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT chanaimeekm patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT solimanhany patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT tsengchialin patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT detskyjay patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT myrehaugsten patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT atenafueshetug patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT helmiali patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT perryjames patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT keithjulia patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT janelimfatmary patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT munozdavidg patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT zadehgelareh patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT shultzdavidb patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT dassunit patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT coolenscatherine patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT alcaideleonpaula patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis
AT maralanipejmanjabehdar patternofrecurrenceofglioblastomaversusgrade4idhmutantastrocytomafollowingchemoradiationaretrospectivematchedcohortanalysis