Cargando…
Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study
OBJECTIVES: The stability of crestal bone has been reported as a major factor in the success of dental implants. Implants can be placed in an equicrestal (crestal) or subcrestal position. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant depth placement on marginal bone loss. MATERIALS AND...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770357 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.3.159 |
_version_ | 1784739166260559872 |
---|---|
author | Sargolzaie, Naser Zarch, Hosein Hoseini Arab, Hamidreza Koohestani, Tahereh Ramandi, Mahdiye Fasihi |
author_facet | Sargolzaie, Naser Zarch, Hosein Hoseini Arab, Hamidreza Koohestani, Tahereh Ramandi, Mahdiye Fasihi |
author_sort | Sargolzaie, Naser |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The stability of crestal bone has been reported as a major factor in the success of dental implants. Implants can be placed in an equicrestal (crestal) or subcrestal position. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant depth placement on marginal bone loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was created in a split-mouth design. Immediately after implant surgery, digital parallel radiographs were prepared and levels of bone were measured where marginal bone loss and bone level changes occurred. These measurements were repeated at 3-month and 6-month follow-up periods. RESULTS: In this interventional study, 49 implants were evaluated in 18 patients. Primary bone height was not significant between the intervention and control groups in both mesial and distal aspects at 3 months and 6 months from the baseline. The mean marginal bone loss on the mesial side was 1.03 mm in the subcrestal group and 0.83 mm in the crestal group. In addition, mean marginal bone loss on the distal side was 0.88 mm and 0.81 mm in the subcrestal and crestal groups, respectively. Marginal bone loss was not significantly different between sexes, the maxilla or mandible, and in the anterior or posterior regions as well as between different lengths and diameters of implants. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, there was no significant difference in terms of marginal bone loss between crestal and subcrestal implants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9247445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92474452022-07-15 Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study Sargolzaie, Naser Zarch, Hosein Hoseini Arab, Hamidreza Koohestani, Tahereh Ramandi, Mahdiye Fasihi J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: The stability of crestal bone has been reported as a major factor in the success of dental implants. Implants can be placed in an equicrestal (crestal) or subcrestal position. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant depth placement on marginal bone loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was created in a split-mouth design. Immediately after implant surgery, digital parallel radiographs were prepared and levels of bone were measured where marginal bone loss and bone level changes occurred. These measurements were repeated at 3-month and 6-month follow-up periods. RESULTS: In this interventional study, 49 implants were evaluated in 18 patients. Primary bone height was not significant between the intervention and control groups in both mesial and distal aspects at 3 months and 6 months from the baseline. The mean marginal bone loss on the mesial side was 1.03 mm in the subcrestal group and 0.83 mm in the crestal group. In addition, mean marginal bone loss on the distal side was 0.88 mm and 0.81 mm in the subcrestal and crestal groups, respectively. Marginal bone loss was not significantly different between sexes, the maxilla or mandible, and in the anterior or posterior regions as well as between different lengths and diameters of implants. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, there was no significant difference in terms of marginal bone loss between crestal and subcrestal implants. The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2022-06-30 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9247445/ /pubmed/35770357 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.3.159 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sargolzaie, Naser Zarch, Hosein Hoseini Arab, Hamidreza Koohestani, Tahereh Ramandi, Mahdiye Fasihi Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study |
title | Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study |
title_full | Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study |
title_fullStr | Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study |
title_short | Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study |
title_sort | marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770357 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.3.159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sargolzaienaser marginalbonelossaroundcrestalorsubcrestaldentalimplantsprospectiveclinicalstudy AT zarchhoseinhoseini marginalbonelossaroundcrestalorsubcrestaldentalimplantsprospectiveclinicalstudy AT arabhamidreza marginalbonelossaroundcrestalorsubcrestaldentalimplantsprospectiveclinicalstudy AT koohestanitahereh marginalbonelossaroundcrestalorsubcrestaldentalimplantsprospectiveclinicalstudy AT ramandimahdiyefasihi marginalbonelossaroundcrestalorsubcrestaldentalimplantsprospectiveclinicalstudy |