Cargando…
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of Knee Arthroplasty versus Joint Distraction for Osteoarthritis (KARDS): protocol for a multicentre, phase III, randomised control trial
INTRODUCTION: Knee replacement (KR) is a clinically proven procedure typically offered to patients with severe knee osteoarthritis (OA) to relieve pain and improve quality of life. However, artificial joints fail over time, requiring revision associated with higher mortality and inferior outcomes. W...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35772819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062721 |
_version_ | 1784739215154610176 |
---|---|
author | Tassinari, Cerys Joyce Higham, Ruchi Smith, Isabelle Louise Arnold, Susanne Mujica-Mota, Ruben Metcalfe, Andrew Simpson, Hamish Murray, David McGonagle, Dennis G Sharma, Hemant Hamilton, Thomas William Ellard, David R Fernandez, Catherine Reynolds, Catherine Harwood, Paul Croft, Julie Stocken, Deborah D Pandit, Hemant |
author_facet | Tassinari, Cerys Joyce Higham, Ruchi Smith, Isabelle Louise Arnold, Susanne Mujica-Mota, Ruben Metcalfe, Andrew Simpson, Hamish Murray, David McGonagle, Dennis G Sharma, Hemant Hamilton, Thomas William Ellard, David R Fernandez, Catherine Reynolds, Catherine Harwood, Paul Croft, Julie Stocken, Deborah D Pandit, Hemant |
author_sort | Tassinari, Cerys Joyce |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Knee replacement (KR) is a clinically proven procedure typically offered to patients with severe knee osteoarthritis (OA) to relieve pain and improve quality of life. However, artificial joints fail over time, requiring revision associated with higher mortality and inferior outcomes. With more young people presenting with knee OA and increasing life expectancy, there is an unmet need to postpone time to first KR. Knee joint distraction (KJD), the practice of using external fixators to open up knee joint space, is proposed as potentially effective to preserve the joint following initial studies in the Netherlands, however, has not been researched within an NHS setting. The KARDS trial will investigate whether KJD is non-inferior to KR in terms of patient-reported postoperative pain 12 months post-surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: KARDS is a phase III, multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, individually randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing KJD with KR in patients with severe knee OA, employing a hybrid-expertise design, with internal pilot phase and process evaluation. 344 participants will be randomised (1:1) to KJD or KR. The primary outcome measure is the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) pain domain score at 12 months post-operation. Secondary outcome measures include patient-reported overall KOOS, Pain Visual Analogue Scale and Oxford Knee Scores, knee function assessments, joint space width, complications and further interventions over 24 months post-operation. Per patient cost difference between KR and KJD and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained over 24 months will be estimated within trial, and incremental cost per QALY gained over 20 years by KJD relative to KR predicted using decision analytic modelling. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee (REC) and Health Research Authority (HRA). Trial results will be disseminated at clinical conferences, through relevant patient groups and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14879004; recruitment opened April 2021. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9247693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92476932022-07-14 Clinical and cost-effectiveness of Knee Arthroplasty versus Joint Distraction for Osteoarthritis (KARDS): protocol for a multicentre, phase III, randomised control trial Tassinari, Cerys Joyce Higham, Ruchi Smith, Isabelle Louise Arnold, Susanne Mujica-Mota, Ruben Metcalfe, Andrew Simpson, Hamish Murray, David McGonagle, Dennis G Sharma, Hemant Hamilton, Thomas William Ellard, David R Fernandez, Catherine Reynolds, Catherine Harwood, Paul Croft, Julie Stocken, Deborah D Pandit, Hemant BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Knee replacement (KR) is a clinically proven procedure typically offered to patients with severe knee osteoarthritis (OA) to relieve pain and improve quality of life. However, artificial joints fail over time, requiring revision associated with higher mortality and inferior outcomes. With more young people presenting with knee OA and increasing life expectancy, there is an unmet need to postpone time to first KR. Knee joint distraction (KJD), the practice of using external fixators to open up knee joint space, is proposed as potentially effective to preserve the joint following initial studies in the Netherlands, however, has not been researched within an NHS setting. The KARDS trial will investigate whether KJD is non-inferior to KR in terms of patient-reported postoperative pain 12 months post-surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: KARDS is a phase III, multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, individually randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing KJD with KR in patients with severe knee OA, employing a hybrid-expertise design, with internal pilot phase and process evaluation. 344 participants will be randomised (1:1) to KJD or KR. The primary outcome measure is the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) pain domain score at 12 months post-operation. Secondary outcome measures include patient-reported overall KOOS, Pain Visual Analogue Scale and Oxford Knee Scores, knee function assessments, joint space width, complications and further interventions over 24 months post-operation. Per patient cost difference between KR and KJD and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained over 24 months will be estimated within trial, and incremental cost per QALY gained over 20 years by KJD relative to KR predicted using decision analytic modelling. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee (REC) and Health Research Authority (HRA). Trial results will be disseminated at clinical conferences, through relevant patient groups and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14879004; recruitment opened April 2021. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9247693/ /pubmed/35772819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062721 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Tassinari, Cerys Joyce Higham, Ruchi Smith, Isabelle Louise Arnold, Susanne Mujica-Mota, Ruben Metcalfe, Andrew Simpson, Hamish Murray, David McGonagle, Dennis G Sharma, Hemant Hamilton, Thomas William Ellard, David R Fernandez, Catherine Reynolds, Catherine Harwood, Paul Croft, Julie Stocken, Deborah D Pandit, Hemant Clinical and cost-effectiveness of Knee Arthroplasty versus Joint Distraction for Osteoarthritis (KARDS): protocol for a multicentre, phase III, randomised control trial |
title | Clinical and cost-effectiveness of Knee Arthroplasty versus Joint Distraction for Osteoarthritis (KARDS): protocol for a multicentre, phase III, randomised control trial |
title_full | Clinical and cost-effectiveness of Knee Arthroplasty versus Joint Distraction for Osteoarthritis (KARDS): protocol for a multicentre, phase III, randomised control trial |
title_fullStr | Clinical and cost-effectiveness of Knee Arthroplasty versus Joint Distraction for Osteoarthritis (KARDS): protocol for a multicentre, phase III, randomised control trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and cost-effectiveness of Knee Arthroplasty versus Joint Distraction for Osteoarthritis (KARDS): protocol for a multicentre, phase III, randomised control trial |
title_short | Clinical and cost-effectiveness of Knee Arthroplasty versus Joint Distraction for Osteoarthritis (KARDS): protocol for a multicentre, phase III, randomised control trial |
title_sort | clinical and cost-effectiveness of knee arthroplasty versus joint distraction for osteoarthritis (kards): protocol for a multicentre, phase iii, randomised control trial |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35772819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062721 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tassinaricerysjoyce clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT highamruchi clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT smithisabellelouise clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT arnoldsusanne clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT mujicamotaruben clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT metcalfeandrew clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT simpsonhamish clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT murraydavid clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT mcgonagledennisg clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT sharmahemant clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT hamiltonthomaswilliam clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT ellarddavidr clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT fernandezcatherine clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT reynoldscatherine clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT harwoodpaul clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT croftjulie clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT stockendeborahd clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial AT pandithemant clinicalandcosteffectivenessofkneearthroplastyversusjointdistractionforosteoarthritiskardsprotocolforamulticentrephaseiiirandomisedcontroltrial |