Cargando…
Clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing: Follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study
In the TRIDENT-2 study, all pregnant women in the Netherlands are offered genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (GW-NIPT) with a choice of receiving either full screening or screening solely for common trisomies. Previous data showed that GW-NIPT can reliably detect common trisomies in the gener...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35659929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.04.018 |
_version_ | 1784739247268298752 |
---|---|
author | van Prooyen Schuurman, Lisanne Sistermans, Erik A. Van Opstal, Diane Henneman, Lidewij Bekker, Mireille N. Bax, Caroline J. Pieters, Mijntje J. Bouman, Katelijne de Munnik, Sonja den Hollander, Nicolette S. Diderich, Karin E.M. Faas, Brigitte H.W. Feenstra, Ilse Go, Attie T.J.I. Hoffer, Mariëtte J.V. Joosten, Marieke Komdeur, Fenne L. Lichtenbelt, Klaske D. Lombardi, Maria P. Polak, Marike G. Jehee, Fernanda S. Schuring-Blom, Heleen Stevens, Servi J.C. Srebniak, Malgorzata I. Suijkerbuijk, Ron F. Tan-Sindhunata, Gita M. van der Meij, Karuna R.M. van Maarle, Merel C. Vernimmen, Vivian van Zelderen-Bhola, Shama L. van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T. Knapen, Maarten F.C.M. Macville, Merryn V.E. Galjaard, Robert-Jan H. |
author_facet | van Prooyen Schuurman, Lisanne Sistermans, Erik A. Van Opstal, Diane Henneman, Lidewij Bekker, Mireille N. Bax, Caroline J. Pieters, Mijntje J. Bouman, Katelijne de Munnik, Sonja den Hollander, Nicolette S. Diderich, Karin E.M. Faas, Brigitte H.W. Feenstra, Ilse Go, Attie T.J.I. Hoffer, Mariëtte J.V. Joosten, Marieke Komdeur, Fenne L. Lichtenbelt, Klaske D. Lombardi, Maria P. Polak, Marike G. Jehee, Fernanda S. Schuring-Blom, Heleen Stevens, Servi J.C. Srebniak, Malgorzata I. Suijkerbuijk, Ron F. Tan-Sindhunata, Gita M. van der Meij, Karuna R.M. van Maarle, Merel C. Vernimmen, Vivian van Zelderen-Bhola, Shama L. van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T. Knapen, Maarten F.C.M. Macville, Merryn V.E. Galjaard, Robert-Jan H. |
author_sort | van Prooyen Schuurman, Lisanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the TRIDENT-2 study, all pregnant women in the Netherlands are offered genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (GW-NIPT) with a choice of receiving either full screening or screening solely for common trisomies. Previous data showed that GW-NIPT can reliably detect common trisomies in the general obstetric population and that this test can also detect other chromosomal abnormalities (additional findings). However, evidence regarding the clinical impact of screening for additional findings is lacking. Therefore, we present follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study to determine this clinical impact based on the laboratory and perinatal outcomes of cases with additional findings. Between April 2017 and April 2019, additional findings were detected in 402/110,739 pregnancies (0.36%). For 358 cases, the origin was proven to be either fetal (n = 79; 22.1%), (assumed) confined placental mosaicism (CPM) (n = 189; 52.8%), or maternal (n = 90; 25.1%). For the remaining 44 (10.9%), the origin of the aberration could not be determined. Most fetal chromosomal aberrations were pathogenic and associated with severe clinical phenotypes (61/79; 77.2%). For CPM cases, occurrence of pre-eclampsia (8.5% [16/189] vs 0.5% [754/159,924]; RR 18.5), and birth weight <2.3rd percentile (13.6% [24/177] vs 2.5% [3,892/155,491]; RR 5.5) were significantly increased compared to the general obstetric population. Of the 90 maternal findings, 12 (13.3%) were malignancies and 32 (35.6%) (mosaic) pathogenic copy number variants, mostly associated with mild or no clinical phenotypes. Data from this large cohort study provide crucial information for deciding if and how to implement GW-NIPT in screening programs. Additionally, these data can inform the challenging interpretation, counseling, and follow-up of additional findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9247828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92478282022-07-02 Clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing: Follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study van Prooyen Schuurman, Lisanne Sistermans, Erik A. Van Opstal, Diane Henneman, Lidewij Bekker, Mireille N. Bax, Caroline J. Pieters, Mijntje J. Bouman, Katelijne de Munnik, Sonja den Hollander, Nicolette S. Diderich, Karin E.M. Faas, Brigitte H.W. Feenstra, Ilse Go, Attie T.J.I. Hoffer, Mariëtte J.V. Joosten, Marieke Komdeur, Fenne L. Lichtenbelt, Klaske D. Lombardi, Maria P. Polak, Marike G. Jehee, Fernanda S. Schuring-Blom, Heleen Stevens, Servi J.C. Srebniak, Malgorzata I. Suijkerbuijk, Ron F. Tan-Sindhunata, Gita M. van der Meij, Karuna R.M. van Maarle, Merel C. Vernimmen, Vivian van Zelderen-Bhola, Shama L. van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T. Knapen, Maarten F.C.M. Macville, Merryn V.E. Galjaard, Robert-Jan H. Am J Hum Genet Article In the TRIDENT-2 study, all pregnant women in the Netherlands are offered genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (GW-NIPT) with a choice of receiving either full screening or screening solely for common trisomies. Previous data showed that GW-NIPT can reliably detect common trisomies in the general obstetric population and that this test can also detect other chromosomal abnormalities (additional findings). However, evidence regarding the clinical impact of screening for additional findings is lacking. Therefore, we present follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study to determine this clinical impact based on the laboratory and perinatal outcomes of cases with additional findings. Between April 2017 and April 2019, additional findings were detected in 402/110,739 pregnancies (0.36%). For 358 cases, the origin was proven to be either fetal (n = 79; 22.1%), (assumed) confined placental mosaicism (CPM) (n = 189; 52.8%), or maternal (n = 90; 25.1%). For the remaining 44 (10.9%), the origin of the aberration could not be determined. Most fetal chromosomal aberrations were pathogenic and associated with severe clinical phenotypes (61/79; 77.2%). For CPM cases, occurrence of pre-eclampsia (8.5% [16/189] vs 0.5% [754/159,924]; RR 18.5), and birth weight <2.3rd percentile (13.6% [24/177] vs 2.5% [3,892/155,491]; RR 5.5) were significantly increased compared to the general obstetric population. Of the 90 maternal findings, 12 (13.3%) were malignancies and 32 (35.6%) (mosaic) pathogenic copy number variants, mostly associated with mild or no clinical phenotypes. Data from this large cohort study provide crucial information for deciding if and how to implement GW-NIPT in screening programs. Additionally, these data can inform the challenging interpretation, counseling, and follow-up of additional findings. Elsevier 2022-06-02 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9247828/ /pubmed/35659929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.04.018 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article van Prooyen Schuurman, Lisanne Sistermans, Erik A. Van Opstal, Diane Henneman, Lidewij Bekker, Mireille N. Bax, Caroline J. Pieters, Mijntje J. Bouman, Katelijne de Munnik, Sonja den Hollander, Nicolette S. Diderich, Karin E.M. Faas, Brigitte H.W. Feenstra, Ilse Go, Attie T.J.I. Hoffer, Mariëtte J.V. Joosten, Marieke Komdeur, Fenne L. Lichtenbelt, Klaske D. Lombardi, Maria P. Polak, Marike G. Jehee, Fernanda S. Schuring-Blom, Heleen Stevens, Servi J.C. Srebniak, Malgorzata I. Suijkerbuijk, Ron F. Tan-Sindhunata, Gita M. van der Meij, Karuna R.M. van Maarle, Merel C. Vernimmen, Vivian van Zelderen-Bhola, Shama L. van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T. Knapen, Maarten F.C.M. Macville, Merryn V.E. Galjaard, Robert-Jan H. Clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing: Follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study |
title | Clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing: Follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study |
title_full | Clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing: Follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study |
title_fullStr | Clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing: Follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing: Follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study |
title_short | Clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing: Follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study |
title_sort | clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing: follow-up results of the trident-2 study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35659929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.04.018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanprooyenschuurmanlisanne clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT sistermanserika clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT vanopstaldiane clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT hennemanlidewij clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT bekkermireillen clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT baxcarolinej clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT pietersmijntjej clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT boumankatelijne clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT demunniksonja clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT denhollandernicolettes clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT diderichkarinem clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT faasbrigittehw clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT feenstrailse clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT goattietji clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT hoffermariettejv clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT joostenmarieke clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT komdeurfennel clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT lichtenbeltklasked clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT lombardimariap clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT polakmarikeg clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT jeheefernandas clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT schuringblomheleen clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT stevensservijc clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT srebniakmalgorzatai clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT suijkerbuijkronf clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT tansindhunatagitam clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT vandermeijkarunarm clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT vanmaarlemerelc clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT vernimmenvivian clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT vanzelderenbholashamal clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT vanravesteynnicolient clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT knapenmaartenfcm clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT macvillemerrynve clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT galjaardrobertjanh clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study AT clinicalimpactofadditionalfindingsdetectedbygenomewidenoninvasiveprenataltestingfollowupresultsofthetrident2study |