Cargando…
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852
The food enzyme cellulase (4‐(1,3;1,4)‐β‐d‐glucan 4‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.4) is produced with the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852 by AB Enzymes GmbH. The genetic modifications did not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is considered free from viable cells of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35795293 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7375 |
_version_ | 1784739252613939200 |
---|---|
author | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Liu, Yi Nielsen, Elsa Norby, Karin di Piazza, Giulio Chesson, Andrew |
author_facet | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Liu, Yi Nielsen, Elsa Norby, Karin di Piazza, Giulio Chesson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The food enzyme cellulase (4‐(1,3;1,4)‐β‐d‐glucan 4‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.4) is produced with the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852 by AB Enzymes GmbH. The genetic modifications did not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is considered free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. The food enzyme is intended to be used in five food manufacturing processes: baking processes, brewing processes, distilled alcohol production, wine and wine vinegar production, and fruit and vegetable processing for juice production. As residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed by distillation, dietary exposure was only calculated for the other four food processes. Dietary exposure to the food enzyme TOS was estimated to be up to 0.1 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not indicate a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,000 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 10,000. A search for similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use (other than distilled alcohol production) the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood for this to occur is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9247864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92478642022-07-05 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852 Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Liu, Yi Nielsen, Elsa Norby, Karin di Piazza, Giulio Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme cellulase (4‐(1,3;1,4)‐β‐d‐glucan 4‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.4) is produced with the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852 by AB Enzymes GmbH. The genetic modifications did not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is considered free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. The food enzyme is intended to be used in five food manufacturing processes: baking processes, brewing processes, distilled alcohol production, wine and wine vinegar production, and fruit and vegetable processing for juice production. As residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed by distillation, dietary exposure was only calculated for the other four food processes. Dietary exposure to the food enzyme TOS was estimated to be up to 0.1 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not indicate a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,000 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 10,000. A search for similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use (other than distilled alcohol production) the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood for this to occur is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9247864/ /pubmed/35795293 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7375 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Liu, Yi Nielsen, Elsa Norby, Karin di Piazza, Giulio Chesson, Andrew Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852 |
title | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852 |
title_full | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852 |
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852 |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852 |
title_short | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852 |
title_sort | safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified trichoderma reesei strain ar‐852 |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35795293 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7375 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT lambreclaude safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT mengelersmarcel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT glandorfboet safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT hermanlieve safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT aguilerajaime safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT nielsenelsa safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT norbykarin safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT dipiazzagiulio safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852 |