Cargando…

Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852

The food enzyme cellulase (4‐(1,3;1,4)‐β‐d‐glucan 4‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.4) is produced with the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852 by AB Enzymes GmbH. The genetic modifications did not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is considered free from viable cells of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambré, Claude, Barat Baviera, José Manuel, Bolognesi, Claudia, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Crebelli, Riccardo, Gott, David Michael, Grob, Konrad, Lampi, Evgenia, Mengelers, Marcel, Mortensen, Alicja, Rivière, Gilles, Steffensen, Inger‐Lise, Tlustos, Christina, Van Loveren, Henk, Vernis, Laurence, Zorn, Holger, Glandorf, Boet, Herman, Lieve, Aguilera, Jaime, Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena, Liu, Yi, Nielsen, Elsa, Norby, Karin, di Piazza, Giulio, Chesson, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35795293
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7375
_version_ 1784739252613939200
author Lambré, Claude
Barat Baviera, José Manuel
Bolognesi, Claudia
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gott, David Michael
Grob, Konrad
Lampi, Evgenia
Mengelers, Marcel
Mortensen, Alicja
Rivière, Gilles
Steffensen, Inger‐Lise
Tlustos, Christina
Van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Zorn, Holger
Glandorf, Boet
Herman, Lieve
Aguilera, Jaime
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Liu, Yi
Nielsen, Elsa
Norby, Karin
di Piazza, Giulio
Chesson, Andrew
author_facet Lambré, Claude
Barat Baviera, José Manuel
Bolognesi, Claudia
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gott, David Michael
Grob, Konrad
Lampi, Evgenia
Mengelers, Marcel
Mortensen, Alicja
Rivière, Gilles
Steffensen, Inger‐Lise
Tlustos, Christina
Van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Zorn, Holger
Glandorf, Boet
Herman, Lieve
Aguilera, Jaime
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Liu, Yi
Nielsen, Elsa
Norby, Karin
di Piazza, Giulio
Chesson, Andrew
collection PubMed
description The food enzyme cellulase (4‐(1,3;1,4)‐β‐d‐glucan 4‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.4) is produced with the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852 by AB Enzymes GmbH. The genetic modifications did not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is considered free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. The food enzyme is intended to be used in five food manufacturing processes: baking processes, brewing processes, distilled alcohol production, wine and wine vinegar production, and fruit and vegetable processing for juice production. As residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed by distillation, dietary exposure was only calculated for the other four food processes. Dietary exposure to the food enzyme TOS was estimated to be up to 0.1 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not indicate a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,000 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 10,000. A search for similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use (other than distilled alcohol production) the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood for this to occur is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9247864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92478642022-07-05 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852 Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Liu, Yi Nielsen, Elsa Norby, Karin di Piazza, Giulio Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme cellulase (4‐(1,3;1,4)‐β‐d‐glucan 4‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.4) is produced with the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852 by AB Enzymes GmbH. The genetic modifications did not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is considered free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. The food enzyme is intended to be used in five food manufacturing processes: baking processes, brewing processes, distilled alcohol production, wine and wine vinegar production, and fruit and vegetable processing for juice production. As residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed by distillation, dietary exposure was only calculated for the other four food processes. Dietary exposure to the food enzyme TOS was estimated to be up to 0.1 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not indicate a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,000 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 10,000. A search for similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use (other than distilled alcohol production) the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood for this to occur is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9247864/ /pubmed/35795293 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7375 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Lambré, Claude
Barat Baviera, José Manuel
Bolognesi, Claudia
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gott, David Michael
Grob, Konrad
Lampi, Evgenia
Mengelers, Marcel
Mortensen, Alicja
Rivière, Gilles
Steffensen, Inger‐Lise
Tlustos, Christina
Van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Zorn, Holger
Glandorf, Boet
Herman, Lieve
Aguilera, Jaime
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Liu, Yi
Nielsen, Elsa
Norby, Karin
di Piazza, Giulio
Chesson, Andrew
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852
title Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852
title_full Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852
title_fullStr Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852
title_full_unstemmed Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852
title_short Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐852
title_sort safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the genetically modified trichoderma reesei strain ar‐852
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35795293
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7375
work_keys_str_mv AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT lambreclaude safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT mengelersmarcel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT glandorfboet safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT hermanlieve safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT aguilerajaime safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT nielsenelsa safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT norbykarin safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT dipiazzagiulio safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852
AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthegeneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistrainar852