Cargando…

Clustering and mapping the first COVID-19 outbreak in France

BACKGROUND: With more than 160 000 confirmed COVID-19 cases and about 30 000 deceased people at the end of June 2020, France was one of the countries most affected by the coronavirus crisis worldwide. We aim to assess the efficiency of global lockdown policy in limiting spatial contamination through...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Darques, Regis, Trottier, Julie, Gaudin, Raphael, Ait-Mouheb, Nassim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35778679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13537-7
_version_ 1784739261938925568
author Darques, Regis
Trottier, Julie
Gaudin, Raphael
Ait-Mouheb, Nassim
author_facet Darques, Regis
Trottier, Julie
Gaudin, Raphael
Ait-Mouheb, Nassim
author_sort Darques, Regis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With more than 160 000 confirmed COVID-19 cases and about 30 000 deceased people at the end of June 2020, France was one of the countries most affected by the coronavirus crisis worldwide. We aim to assess the efficiency of global lockdown policy in limiting spatial contamination through an in-depth reanalysis of spatial statistics in France during the first lockdown and immediate post-lockdown phases. METHODS: To reach that goal, we use an integrated approach at the crossroads of geography, spatial epidemiology, and public health science. To eliminate any ambiguity relevant to the scope of the study, attention focused at first on data quality assessment. The data used originate from official databases (Santé Publique France) and the analysis is performed at a departmental level. We then developed spatial autocorrelation analysis, thematic mapping, hot spot analysis, and multivariate clustering. RESULTS: We observe the extreme heterogeneity of local situations and demonstrate that clustering and intensity are decorrelated indicators. Thematic mapping allows us to identify five “ghost” clusters, whereas hot spot analysis detects two positive and two negative clusters. Our re-evaluation also highlights that spatial dissemination follows a twofold logic, zonal contiguity and linear development, thus determining a “metastatic” propagation pattern. CONCLUSIONS: One of the most problematic issues about COVID-19 management by the authorities is the limited capacity to identify hot spots. Clustering of epidemic events is often biased because of inappropriate data quality assessment and algorithms eliminating statistical-spatial outliers. Enhanced detection techniques allow for a better identification of hot and cold spots, which may lead to more effective political decisions during epidemic outbreaks.  GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9247918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92479182022-07-01 Clustering and mapping the first COVID-19 outbreak in France Darques, Regis Trottier, Julie Gaudin, Raphael Ait-Mouheb, Nassim BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: With more than 160 000 confirmed COVID-19 cases and about 30 000 deceased people at the end of June 2020, France was one of the countries most affected by the coronavirus crisis worldwide. We aim to assess the efficiency of global lockdown policy in limiting spatial contamination through an in-depth reanalysis of spatial statistics in France during the first lockdown and immediate post-lockdown phases. METHODS: To reach that goal, we use an integrated approach at the crossroads of geography, spatial epidemiology, and public health science. To eliminate any ambiguity relevant to the scope of the study, attention focused at first on data quality assessment. The data used originate from official databases (Santé Publique France) and the analysis is performed at a departmental level. We then developed spatial autocorrelation analysis, thematic mapping, hot spot analysis, and multivariate clustering. RESULTS: We observe the extreme heterogeneity of local situations and demonstrate that clustering and intensity are decorrelated indicators. Thematic mapping allows us to identify five “ghost” clusters, whereas hot spot analysis detects two positive and two negative clusters. Our re-evaluation also highlights that spatial dissemination follows a twofold logic, zonal contiguity and linear development, thus determining a “metastatic” propagation pattern. CONCLUSIONS: One of the most problematic issues about COVID-19 management by the authorities is the limited capacity to identify hot spots. Clustering of epidemic events is often biased because of inappropriate data quality assessment and algorithms eliminating statistical-spatial outliers. Enhanced detection techniques allow for a better identification of hot and cold spots, which may lead to more effective political decisions during epidemic outbreaks.  GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9247918/ /pubmed/35778679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13537-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Darques, Regis
Trottier, Julie
Gaudin, Raphael
Ait-Mouheb, Nassim
Clustering and mapping the first COVID-19 outbreak in France
title Clustering and mapping the first COVID-19 outbreak in France
title_full Clustering and mapping the first COVID-19 outbreak in France
title_fullStr Clustering and mapping the first COVID-19 outbreak in France
title_full_unstemmed Clustering and mapping the first COVID-19 outbreak in France
title_short Clustering and mapping the first COVID-19 outbreak in France
title_sort clustering and mapping the first covid-19 outbreak in france
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35778679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13537-7
work_keys_str_mv AT darquesregis clusteringandmappingthefirstcovid19outbreakinfrance
AT trottierjulie clusteringandmappingthefirstcovid19outbreakinfrance
AT gaudinraphael clusteringandmappingthefirstcovid19outbreakinfrance
AT aitmouhebnassim clusteringandmappingthefirstcovid19outbreakinfrance