Cargando…
Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study
BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a highly effective form of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) with few contraindications. Users, however, often encounter barriers to desired removal. IUD self-removal may mitigate these obstacles. We sought to develop a guide for IUD self-remova...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-022-00177-w |
_version_ | 1784739274282762240 |
---|---|
author | Collins, Francesca Gilmore, Kelly Petrie, Kelsey A. Benson, Lyndsey S. |
author_facet | Collins, Francesca Gilmore, Kelly Petrie, Kelsey A. Benson, Lyndsey S. |
author_sort | Collins, Francesca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a highly effective form of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) with few contraindications. Users, however, often encounter barriers to desired removal. IUD self-removal may mitigate these obstacles. We sought to develop a guide for IUD self-removal with the aim of increasing user control over the method. METHODS: This was a two-phase mixed-methods qualitative and small pilot study with the aim of developing an IUD self-removal guide. We conducted an online content analysis of advice for IUD self-removal as well as interviews with expert key informants to develop an IUD self-removal guide. We next recruited IUD-users who had previously attempted self-removal to participate in focus group discussion and individual interviews to further refine the guide. In the second phase of the study, we piloted the guide among eight IUD-users seeking removal interested in attempting self-removal. RESULTS: Expert key informants agreed that IUD self-removal was safe and low risk. The primary components of successful IUD self-removal elicited were ability to feel and grasp the strings, a crouched down position, and multiple attempts. A preference for presenting IUD self-removal as safe was emphasized. In the second phase, participants in the clinical pilot suggested more information for non-palpable strings, but liked the style and information provided. One participant successfully removed their IUD. CONCLUSIONS: IUD-users reported satisfaction with our guide. In our small pilot, the majority were unable to remove their own IUD. A larger study is needed to assess acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy in increasing successful self-removal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9247965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92479652022-07-01 Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study Collins, Francesca Gilmore, Kelly Petrie, Kelsey A. Benson, Lyndsey S. Contracept Reprod Med Research BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a highly effective form of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) with few contraindications. Users, however, often encounter barriers to desired removal. IUD self-removal may mitigate these obstacles. We sought to develop a guide for IUD self-removal with the aim of increasing user control over the method. METHODS: This was a two-phase mixed-methods qualitative and small pilot study with the aim of developing an IUD self-removal guide. We conducted an online content analysis of advice for IUD self-removal as well as interviews with expert key informants to develop an IUD self-removal guide. We next recruited IUD-users who had previously attempted self-removal to participate in focus group discussion and individual interviews to further refine the guide. In the second phase of the study, we piloted the guide among eight IUD-users seeking removal interested in attempting self-removal. RESULTS: Expert key informants agreed that IUD self-removal was safe and low risk. The primary components of successful IUD self-removal elicited were ability to feel and grasp the strings, a crouched down position, and multiple attempts. A preference for presenting IUD self-removal as safe was emphasized. In the second phase, participants in the clinical pilot suggested more information for non-palpable strings, but liked the style and information provided. One participant successfully removed their IUD. CONCLUSIONS: IUD-users reported satisfaction with our guide. In our small pilot, the majority were unable to remove their own IUD. A larger study is needed to assess acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy in increasing successful self-removal. BioMed Central 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9247965/ /pubmed/35773738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-022-00177-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Collins, Francesca Gilmore, Kelly Petrie, Kelsey A. Benson, Lyndsey S. Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study |
title | Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study |
title_full | Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study |
title_fullStr | Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study |
title_short | Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study |
title_sort | developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-022-00177-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT collinsfrancesca developinganintrauterinedeviceselfremovalguideamixedmethodsqualitativeandsmallpilotstudy AT gilmorekelly developinganintrauterinedeviceselfremovalguideamixedmethodsqualitativeandsmallpilotstudy AT petriekelseya developinganintrauterinedeviceselfremovalguideamixedmethodsqualitativeandsmallpilotstudy AT bensonlyndseys developinganintrauterinedeviceselfremovalguideamixedmethodsqualitativeandsmallpilotstudy |