Cargando…

Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study

BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a highly effective form of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) with few contraindications. Users, however, often encounter barriers to desired removal. IUD self-removal may mitigate these obstacles. We sought to develop a guide for IUD self-remova...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collins, Francesca, Gilmore, Kelly, Petrie, Kelsey A., Benson, Lyndsey S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-022-00177-w
_version_ 1784739274282762240
author Collins, Francesca
Gilmore, Kelly
Petrie, Kelsey A.
Benson, Lyndsey S.
author_facet Collins, Francesca
Gilmore, Kelly
Petrie, Kelsey A.
Benson, Lyndsey S.
author_sort Collins, Francesca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a highly effective form of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) with few contraindications. Users, however, often encounter barriers to desired removal. IUD self-removal may mitigate these obstacles. We sought to develop a guide for IUD self-removal with the aim of increasing user control over the method. METHODS: This was a two-phase mixed-methods qualitative and small pilot study with the aim of developing an IUD self-removal guide. We conducted an online content analysis of advice for IUD self-removal as well as interviews with expert key informants to develop an IUD self-removal guide. We next recruited IUD-users who had previously attempted self-removal to participate in focus group discussion and individual interviews to further refine the guide. In the second phase of the study, we piloted the guide among eight IUD-users seeking removal interested in attempting self-removal. RESULTS: Expert key informants agreed that IUD self-removal was safe and low risk. The primary components of successful IUD self-removal elicited were ability to feel and grasp the strings, a crouched down position, and multiple attempts. A preference for presenting IUD self-removal as safe was emphasized. In the second phase, participants in the clinical pilot suggested more information for non-palpable strings, but liked the style and information provided. One participant successfully removed their IUD. CONCLUSIONS: IUD-users reported satisfaction with our guide. In our small pilot, the majority were unable to remove their own IUD. A larger study is needed to assess acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy in increasing successful self-removal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9247965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92479652022-07-01 Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study Collins, Francesca Gilmore, Kelly Petrie, Kelsey A. Benson, Lyndsey S. Contracept Reprod Med Research BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a highly effective form of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) with few contraindications. Users, however, often encounter barriers to desired removal. IUD self-removal may mitigate these obstacles. We sought to develop a guide for IUD self-removal with the aim of increasing user control over the method. METHODS: This was a two-phase mixed-methods qualitative and small pilot study with the aim of developing an IUD self-removal guide. We conducted an online content analysis of advice for IUD self-removal as well as interviews with expert key informants to develop an IUD self-removal guide. We next recruited IUD-users who had previously attempted self-removal to participate in focus group discussion and individual interviews to further refine the guide. In the second phase of the study, we piloted the guide among eight IUD-users seeking removal interested in attempting self-removal. RESULTS: Expert key informants agreed that IUD self-removal was safe and low risk. The primary components of successful IUD self-removal elicited were ability to feel and grasp the strings, a crouched down position, and multiple attempts. A preference for presenting IUD self-removal as safe was emphasized. In the second phase, participants in the clinical pilot suggested more information for non-palpable strings, but liked the style and information provided. One participant successfully removed their IUD. CONCLUSIONS: IUD-users reported satisfaction with our guide. In our small pilot, the majority were unable to remove their own IUD. A larger study is needed to assess acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy in increasing successful self-removal. BioMed Central 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9247965/ /pubmed/35773738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-022-00177-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Collins, Francesca
Gilmore, Kelly
Petrie, Kelsey A.
Benson, Lyndsey S.
Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study
title Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study
title_full Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study
title_fullStr Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study
title_short Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study
title_sort developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-022-00177-w
work_keys_str_mv AT collinsfrancesca developinganintrauterinedeviceselfremovalguideamixedmethodsqualitativeandsmallpilotstudy
AT gilmorekelly developinganintrauterinedeviceselfremovalguideamixedmethodsqualitativeandsmallpilotstudy
AT petriekelseya developinganintrauterinedeviceselfremovalguideamixedmethodsqualitativeandsmallpilotstudy
AT bensonlyndseys developinganintrauterinedeviceselfremovalguideamixedmethodsqualitativeandsmallpilotstudy