Cargando…

Evaluation of the penetration of intracoronal bleaching agents into the cervical region using different intraorifice barriers

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to make a comparison between the effects of 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (HP) and sodium perborate with distilled water (SP) bleaching agents on the sealing characteristics of glass ionomer cement (GIC), TheraBase, ProRoot MTA and Biodentine intraorifice barriers. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakalli, Bugce, Basmaci, Fatma, Dalmizrak, Ozlem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9248123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02300-4
_version_ 1784739305512501248
author Sakalli, Bugce
Basmaci, Fatma
Dalmizrak, Ozlem
author_facet Sakalli, Bugce
Basmaci, Fatma
Dalmizrak, Ozlem
author_sort Sakalli, Bugce
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to make a comparison between the effects of 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (HP) and sodium perborate with distilled water (SP) bleaching agents on the sealing characteristics of glass ionomer cement (GIC), TheraBase, ProRoot MTA and Biodentine intraorifice barriers. METHODS: One hundred and twelve single-rooted mandibular human premolar teeth extracted from young patients (14–25 years) were chosen. Root cement and cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of teeth were examined under a stereomicroscope at 10 × magnification to ensure there was no cement defect or dentin gap in CEJ. After the endodontic access cavities were opened on the occlusal surfaces of the teeth, the working length was determined. Instrumentation of each root canal was performed with a ProTaper Gold rotary system in the determined working length and filled with gutta-percha + AH Plus with a single cone technique using. Root fillings were removed 3 mm short of the CEJ and sealed with one of the following intraorifice barrier materials (n = 30/group): 1. GIC; 2. TheraBase; 3. ProProot-MTA; 4. Biodentine. In each of the sub-groups, either HP or SP was used to perform intracoronal bleaching on days 1, 4, and 7. All outer surfaces of the specimens except the 3 mm cervical region were covered with nail polish and modeling wax layers. Specimens were immersed in a 5 ml Eppendorf tube that contained 2 mL of distilled water. The penetration of peroxide release was measured using the colorimetric ferric thiocyanate method. Statistical analysis of the data was performed with Three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (P = 0.05). RESULTS: In the HP groups, GIC showed the greatest peroxide release when compared with other tested groups on day 1 (P < 0.05). Biodentine and ProRoot MTA displayed a significantly lower peroxide leakage when compared to GIC and TheraBase on days 1 and 4 (P < 0.05). While GIC and TheraBase were used, HP observed higher peroxide penetration when compared with SP on days 1 and 4 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Peroxide diffusion was significantly influenced by the kind of intracoronal bleaching agents and intraorifice barrier materials used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9248123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92481232022-07-02 Evaluation of the penetration of intracoronal bleaching agents into the cervical region using different intraorifice barriers Sakalli, Bugce Basmaci, Fatma Dalmizrak, Ozlem BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to make a comparison between the effects of 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (HP) and sodium perborate with distilled water (SP) bleaching agents on the sealing characteristics of glass ionomer cement (GIC), TheraBase, ProRoot MTA and Biodentine intraorifice barriers. METHODS: One hundred and twelve single-rooted mandibular human premolar teeth extracted from young patients (14–25 years) were chosen. Root cement and cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of teeth were examined under a stereomicroscope at 10 × magnification to ensure there was no cement defect or dentin gap in CEJ. After the endodontic access cavities were opened on the occlusal surfaces of the teeth, the working length was determined. Instrumentation of each root canal was performed with a ProTaper Gold rotary system in the determined working length and filled with gutta-percha + AH Plus with a single cone technique using. Root fillings were removed 3 mm short of the CEJ and sealed with one of the following intraorifice barrier materials (n = 30/group): 1. GIC; 2. TheraBase; 3. ProProot-MTA; 4. Biodentine. In each of the sub-groups, either HP or SP was used to perform intracoronal bleaching on days 1, 4, and 7. All outer surfaces of the specimens except the 3 mm cervical region were covered with nail polish and modeling wax layers. Specimens were immersed in a 5 ml Eppendorf tube that contained 2 mL of distilled water. The penetration of peroxide release was measured using the colorimetric ferric thiocyanate method. Statistical analysis of the data was performed with Three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (P = 0.05). RESULTS: In the HP groups, GIC showed the greatest peroxide release when compared with other tested groups on day 1 (P < 0.05). Biodentine and ProRoot MTA displayed a significantly lower peroxide leakage when compared to GIC and TheraBase on days 1 and 4 (P < 0.05). While GIC and TheraBase were used, HP observed higher peroxide penetration when compared with SP on days 1 and 4 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Peroxide diffusion was significantly influenced by the kind of intracoronal bleaching agents and intraorifice barrier materials used. BioMed Central 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9248123/ /pubmed/35773675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02300-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sakalli, Bugce
Basmaci, Fatma
Dalmizrak, Ozlem
Evaluation of the penetration of intracoronal bleaching agents into the cervical region using different intraorifice barriers
title Evaluation of the penetration of intracoronal bleaching agents into the cervical region using different intraorifice barriers
title_full Evaluation of the penetration of intracoronal bleaching agents into the cervical region using different intraorifice barriers
title_fullStr Evaluation of the penetration of intracoronal bleaching agents into the cervical region using different intraorifice barriers
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the penetration of intracoronal bleaching agents into the cervical region using different intraorifice barriers
title_short Evaluation of the penetration of intracoronal bleaching agents into the cervical region using different intraorifice barriers
title_sort evaluation of the penetration of intracoronal bleaching agents into the cervical region using different intraorifice barriers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9248123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02300-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sakallibugce evaluationofthepenetrationofintracoronalbleachingagentsintothecervicalregionusingdifferentintraorificebarriers
AT basmacifatma evaluationofthepenetrationofintracoronalbleachingagentsintothecervicalregionusingdifferentintraorificebarriers
AT dalmizrakozlem evaluationofthepenetrationofintracoronalbleachingagentsintothecervicalregionusingdifferentintraorificebarriers