Cargando…

A closer look at the WHO cone bioassay: video analysis of the hidden effects of a human host on mosquito behaviour and insecticide contact

BACKGROUND: The WHO cone test is one of three tests currently used to evaluate the efficacy of insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs). It generates two test outputs, knockdown and 24-h mortality, both indicative of immediate toxicity but that reveal little about the nature of mosquito and ITN interacti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Angela, Matope, Agnes, Emery, Mischa, Steen, Keith, Murray, Gregory, Ranson, Hilary, McCall, Philip J., Foster, Geraldine M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9248144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35778744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04232-4
_version_ 1784739309354483712
author Hughes, Angela
Matope, Agnes
Emery, Mischa
Steen, Keith
Murray, Gregory
Ranson, Hilary
McCall, Philip J.
Foster, Geraldine M.
author_facet Hughes, Angela
Matope, Agnes
Emery, Mischa
Steen, Keith
Murray, Gregory
Ranson, Hilary
McCall, Philip J.
Foster, Geraldine M.
author_sort Hughes, Angela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The WHO cone test is one of three tests currently used to evaluate the efficacy of insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs). It generates two test outputs, knockdown and 24-h mortality, both indicative of immediate toxicity but that reveal little about the nature of mosquito and ITN interaction or how results translate to real-world settings. METHODS: A human arm held 5 mm behind the net surface acted as a host attractant during cone tests and a smartphone was used to capture mosquito behaviour in the cone. Post-exposure blood feeding and survival for nine days were recorded; ingested blood meal size was determined by measuring excreted haematin. Four strains of Anopheles gambiae (insecticide susceptible: Kisumu and N’gousso; insecticide resistant: Banfora and VK7) were tested with and without the host attractant using untreated, Permanet 2.0 and Olyset nets. Video recordings were scan sampled every five seconds to record mosquito positions on either the net, in flight or in contact with the cone. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyse all data except survival within nine days which was analysed using Weighted Cox Regression. RESULTS: Net contact was the most frequently recorded behaviour in all Anopheles spp. strains on all nets. Adding the human host as attractant triggered excitatory behaviours: in all strains, the magnitude of net contact was significantly decreased compared to tests without a host. ITN exposure altered the observed behaviour of the two susceptible strains, which exhibited a decreased response to the host during ITN tests. The resistant strains did not alter their behaviour during ITN tests. Significantly less net contact was observed during Olyset Net tests compared to Permanet 2.0. The host presence affected survival after exposure: Banfora and VK7 mosquitoes exposed to Permanet 2.0 with a host lived longer compared to tests performed without a host. However, mosquitoes that blood-fed and survived long enough to digest the blood meal did not exhibit significantly reduced longevity regardless of the presence of the host attractant. CONCLUSIONS: Simple modifications to the WHO cone test and extension of post-test monitoring beyond the current 24 h enable detailed behavioural characterizations of individual ITNs to be compiled. The effects observed from testing with a host and including blood feeding suggest that more representative estimates of true of ITN efficacy are gained with these modifications than when using the current testing protocol. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-022-04232-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9248144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92481442022-07-02 A closer look at the WHO cone bioassay: video analysis of the hidden effects of a human host on mosquito behaviour and insecticide contact Hughes, Angela Matope, Agnes Emery, Mischa Steen, Keith Murray, Gregory Ranson, Hilary McCall, Philip J. Foster, Geraldine M. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: The WHO cone test is one of three tests currently used to evaluate the efficacy of insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs). It generates two test outputs, knockdown and 24-h mortality, both indicative of immediate toxicity but that reveal little about the nature of mosquito and ITN interaction or how results translate to real-world settings. METHODS: A human arm held 5 mm behind the net surface acted as a host attractant during cone tests and a smartphone was used to capture mosquito behaviour in the cone. Post-exposure blood feeding and survival for nine days were recorded; ingested blood meal size was determined by measuring excreted haematin. Four strains of Anopheles gambiae (insecticide susceptible: Kisumu and N’gousso; insecticide resistant: Banfora and VK7) were tested with and without the host attractant using untreated, Permanet 2.0 and Olyset nets. Video recordings were scan sampled every five seconds to record mosquito positions on either the net, in flight or in contact with the cone. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyse all data except survival within nine days which was analysed using Weighted Cox Regression. RESULTS: Net contact was the most frequently recorded behaviour in all Anopheles spp. strains on all nets. Adding the human host as attractant triggered excitatory behaviours: in all strains, the magnitude of net contact was significantly decreased compared to tests without a host. ITN exposure altered the observed behaviour of the two susceptible strains, which exhibited a decreased response to the host during ITN tests. The resistant strains did not alter their behaviour during ITN tests. Significantly less net contact was observed during Olyset Net tests compared to Permanet 2.0. The host presence affected survival after exposure: Banfora and VK7 mosquitoes exposed to Permanet 2.0 with a host lived longer compared to tests performed without a host. However, mosquitoes that blood-fed and survived long enough to digest the blood meal did not exhibit significantly reduced longevity regardless of the presence of the host attractant. CONCLUSIONS: Simple modifications to the WHO cone test and extension of post-test monitoring beyond the current 24 h enable detailed behavioural characterizations of individual ITNs to be compiled. The effects observed from testing with a host and including blood feeding suggest that more representative estimates of true of ITN efficacy are gained with these modifications than when using the current testing protocol. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-022-04232-4. BioMed Central 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9248144/ /pubmed/35778744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04232-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hughes, Angela
Matope, Agnes
Emery, Mischa
Steen, Keith
Murray, Gregory
Ranson, Hilary
McCall, Philip J.
Foster, Geraldine M.
A closer look at the WHO cone bioassay: video analysis of the hidden effects of a human host on mosquito behaviour and insecticide contact
title A closer look at the WHO cone bioassay: video analysis of the hidden effects of a human host on mosquito behaviour and insecticide contact
title_full A closer look at the WHO cone bioassay: video analysis of the hidden effects of a human host on mosquito behaviour and insecticide contact
title_fullStr A closer look at the WHO cone bioassay: video analysis of the hidden effects of a human host on mosquito behaviour and insecticide contact
title_full_unstemmed A closer look at the WHO cone bioassay: video analysis of the hidden effects of a human host on mosquito behaviour and insecticide contact
title_short A closer look at the WHO cone bioassay: video analysis of the hidden effects of a human host on mosquito behaviour and insecticide contact
title_sort closer look at the who cone bioassay: video analysis of the hidden effects of a human host on mosquito behaviour and insecticide contact
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9248144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35778744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04232-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hughesangela acloserlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT matopeagnes acloserlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT emerymischa acloserlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT steenkeith acloserlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT murraygregory acloserlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT ransonhilary acloserlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT mccallphilipj acloserlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT fostergeraldinem acloserlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT hughesangela closerlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT matopeagnes closerlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT emerymischa closerlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT steenkeith closerlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT murraygregory closerlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT ransonhilary closerlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT mccallphilipj closerlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact
AT fostergeraldinem closerlookatthewhoconebioassayvideoanalysisofthehiddeneffectsofahumanhostonmosquitobehaviourandinsecticidecontact