Cargando…

Comparison of the 3D-Microstructure Between Alveolar and Iliac Bone for Enhanced Bioinspired Bone Graft Substitutes

In oral- and maxillofacial bone augmentation surgery, non-vascularized grafts from the iliac crest demonstrate better clinical performance than alveolar bone grafts. The underlying mechanisms are not fully understood but are essential for the enhancement of bone regeneration scaffolds. Synchrotron R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rothweiler, Rene, Gross, Christian, Bortel, Emely, Früh, Sarah, Gerber, Javier, Boller, Elodie, Wüster, Jonas, Stricker, Andres, Fretwurst, Tobias, Iglhaut, Gerhard, Nahles, Susanne, Schmelzeisen, Rainer, Hesse, Bernhard, Nelson, Katja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9248932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35782504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.862395
_version_ 1784739460030660608
author Rothweiler, Rene
Gross, Christian
Bortel, Emely
Früh, Sarah
Gerber, Javier
Boller, Elodie
Wüster, Jonas
Stricker, Andres
Fretwurst, Tobias
Iglhaut, Gerhard
Nahles, Susanne
Schmelzeisen, Rainer
Hesse, Bernhard
Nelson, Katja
author_facet Rothweiler, Rene
Gross, Christian
Bortel, Emely
Früh, Sarah
Gerber, Javier
Boller, Elodie
Wüster, Jonas
Stricker, Andres
Fretwurst, Tobias
Iglhaut, Gerhard
Nahles, Susanne
Schmelzeisen, Rainer
Hesse, Bernhard
Nelson, Katja
author_sort Rothweiler, Rene
collection PubMed
description In oral- and maxillofacial bone augmentation surgery, non-vascularized grafts from the iliac crest demonstrate better clinical performance than alveolar bone grafts. The underlying mechanisms are not fully understood but are essential for the enhancement of bone regeneration scaffolds. Synchrotron Radiation µ-CT at a pixel size of 2.3 μm was used to characterize the gross morphology and the vascular and osteocyte lacuna porosity of patient-matched iliac crest/alveolar bone samples. The results suggest a difference in the spatial distribution of the vascular pore system. Fluid simulations reveal the permeability tensor to be more homogeneous in the iliac crest, indicating a more unidirectional fluid flow in alveolar bone. The average distance between bone mineral and the closest vessel pore boundary was found to be higher in alveolar bone. At the same time, osteocyte lacunae density is higher in alveolar bone, potentially compensating for the longer average distance between the bone mineral and vessel pores. The present study comprehensively quantified and compared the 3D microarchitecture of intraindividual human alveolar and iliac bone. The identified difference in pore network architecture may allow a bone graft from the iliac crest to exhibit higher regeneration potential due to an increased capacity to connect with the surrounding pore network of the residual bone. The results may contribute to understanding the difference in clinical performance when used as bone grafts and are essential for optimization of future scaffold materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9248932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92489322022-07-02 Comparison of the 3D-Microstructure Between Alveolar and Iliac Bone for Enhanced Bioinspired Bone Graft Substitutes Rothweiler, Rene Gross, Christian Bortel, Emely Früh, Sarah Gerber, Javier Boller, Elodie Wüster, Jonas Stricker, Andres Fretwurst, Tobias Iglhaut, Gerhard Nahles, Susanne Schmelzeisen, Rainer Hesse, Bernhard Nelson, Katja Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology In oral- and maxillofacial bone augmentation surgery, non-vascularized grafts from the iliac crest demonstrate better clinical performance than alveolar bone grafts. The underlying mechanisms are not fully understood but are essential for the enhancement of bone regeneration scaffolds. Synchrotron Radiation µ-CT at a pixel size of 2.3 μm was used to characterize the gross morphology and the vascular and osteocyte lacuna porosity of patient-matched iliac crest/alveolar bone samples. The results suggest a difference in the spatial distribution of the vascular pore system. Fluid simulations reveal the permeability tensor to be more homogeneous in the iliac crest, indicating a more unidirectional fluid flow in alveolar bone. The average distance between bone mineral and the closest vessel pore boundary was found to be higher in alveolar bone. At the same time, osteocyte lacunae density is higher in alveolar bone, potentially compensating for the longer average distance between the bone mineral and vessel pores. The present study comprehensively quantified and compared the 3D microarchitecture of intraindividual human alveolar and iliac bone. The identified difference in pore network architecture may allow a bone graft from the iliac crest to exhibit higher regeneration potential due to an increased capacity to connect with the surrounding pore network of the residual bone. The results may contribute to understanding the difference in clinical performance when used as bone grafts and are essential for optimization of future scaffold materials. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9248932/ /pubmed/35782504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.862395 Text en Copyright © 2022 Rothweiler, Gross, Bortel, Früh, Gerber, Boller, Wüster, Stricker, Fretwurst, Iglhaut, Nahles, Schmelzeisen, Hesse and Nelson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Rothweiler, Rene
Gross, Christian
Bortel, Emely
Früh, Sarah
Gerber, Javier
Boller, Elodie
Wüster, Jonas
Stricker, Andres
Fretwurst, Tobias
Iglhaut, Gerhard
Nahles, Susanne
Schmelzeisen, Rainer
Hesse, Bernhard
Nelson, Katja
Comparison of the 3D-Microstructure Between Alveolar and Iliac Bone for Enhanced Bioinspired Bone Graft Substitutes
title Comparison of the 3D-Microstructure Between Alveolar and Iliac Bone for Enhanced Bioinspired Bone Graft Substitutes
title_full Comparison of the 3D-Microstructure Between Alveolar and Iliac Bone for Enhanced Bioinspired Bone Graft Substitutes
title_fullStr Comparison of the 3D-Microstructure Between Alveolar and Iliac Bone for Enhanced Bioinspired Bone Graft Substitutes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the 3D-Microstructure Between Alveolar and Iliac Bone for Enhanced Bioinspired Bone Graft Substitutes
title_short Comparison of the 3D-Microstructure Between Alveolar and Iliac Bone for Enhanced Bioinspired Bone Graft Substitutes
title_sort comparison of the 3d-microstructure between alveolar and iliac bone for enhanced bioinspired bone graft substitutes
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9248932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35782504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.862395
work_keys_str_mv AT rothweilerrene comparisonofthe3dmicrostructurebetweenalveolarandiliacboneforenhancedbioinspiredbonegraftsubstitutes
AT grosschristian comparisonofthe3dmicrostructurebetweenalveolarandiliacboneforenhancedbioinspiredbonegraftsubstitutes
AT bortelemely comparisonofthe3dmicrostructurebetweenalveolarandiliacboneforenhancedbioinspiredbonegraftsubstitutes
AT fruhsarah comparisonofthe3dmicrostructurebetweenalveolarandiliacboneforenhancedbioinspiredbonegraftsubstitutes
AT gerberjavier comparisonofthe3dmicrostructurebetweenalveolarandiliacboneforenhancedbioinspiredbonegraftsubstitutes
AT bollerelodie comparisonofthe3dmicrostructurebetweenalveolarandiliacboneforenhancedbioinspiredbonegraftsubstitutes
AT wusterjonas comparisonofthe3dmicrostructurebetweenalveolarandiliacboneforenhancedbioinspiredbonegraftsubstitutes
AT strickerandres comparisonofthe3dmicrostructurebetweenalveolarandiliacboneforenhancedbioinspiredbonegraftsubstitutes
AT fretwursttobias comparisonofthe3dmicrostructurebetweenalveolarandiliacboneforenhancedbioinspiredbonegraftsubstitutes
AT iglhautgerhard comparisonofthe3dmicrostructurebetweenalveolarandiliacboneforenhancedbioinspiredbonegraftsubstitutes
AT nahlessusanne comparisonofthe3dmicrostructurebetweenalveolarandiliacboneforenhancedbioinspiredbonegraftsubstitutes
AT schmelzeisenrainer comparisonofthe3dmicrostructurebetweenalveolarandiliacboneforenhancedbioinspiredbonegraftsubstitutes
AT hessebernhard comparisonofthe3dmicrostructurebetweenalveolarandiliacboneforenhancedbioinspiredbonegraftsubstitutes
AT nelsonkatja comparisonofthe3dmicrostructurebetweenalveolarandiliacboneforenhancedbioinspiredbonegraftsubstitutes