Cargando…

An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the utilization of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal anticoagulation strategy for AF patients with bioprosthetic heart valves (BPHV) remains controversial. Therefore, we cond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Yalin, Zheng, Yuxiang, Li, Siyuan, Liu, Fuwei, Xue, Zhengbiao, Yin, Kang, Luo, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9248967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783817
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.899906
_version_ 1784739467413684224
author Cao, Yalin
Zheng, Yuxiang
Li, Siyuan
Liu, Fuwei
Xue, Zhengbiao
Yin, Kang
Luo, Jun
author_facet Cao, Yalin
Zheng, Yuxiang
Li, Siyuan
Liu, Fuwei
Xue, Zhengbiao
Yin, Kang
Luo, Jun
author_sort Cao, Yalin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the utilization of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal anticoagulation strategy for AF patients with bioprosthetic heart valves (BPHV) remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to explore the effect of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this population. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases until November 2021 for studies reporting the effect of DOACs versus VKAs in AF patients with BPHV. Adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using the random-effects model with an inverse variance method. RESULTS: We selected four randomized clinical trials and seven observational studies (2236 DOAC- and 6403 VKAs-users). Regarding the effectiveness outcomes, there were no significant differences between DOACs and VKAs in stroke or systemic embolism (RR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.50–1.08), ischemic stroke (RR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.76–1.55), all-cause death (RR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.86–1.12), and cardiovascular death (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.40–1.80). In terms of the safety outcomes, DOACs was associated with lower risks of major bleeding (RR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.59–0.82) and intracranial bleeding (RR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.26–0.70), but the risks of any bleeding (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.65–1.13) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.73–1.17) are not significantly different when compared with VKAs. The subgroup analysis with follow-up as a covariate revealed that the DOACs had lower risks of SSE (RR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.37–0.94) and major bleeding (RR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.58–0.81) in patients with a mean follow-up of more than 24 months, but no statistical differences were found in patients with the follow-up less than 24 months (SSE: RR = 1.10, 95%CI: 0.92–1.32; major bleeding: RR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.42–2.01). CONCLUSIONS: In AF with BPHV, patients on DOACs experienced a reduced risk of major bleeding and intracranial bleeding compared with VKAs, while the risks of stroke, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality were similar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9248967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92489672022-07-02 An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Cao, Yalin Zheng, Yuxiang Li, Siyuan Liu, Fuwei Xue, Zhengbiao Yin, Kang Luo, Jun Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the utilization of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal anticoagulation strategy for AF patients with bioprosthetic heart valves (BPHV) remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to explore the effect of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this population. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases until November 2021 for studies reporting the effect of DOACs versus VKAs in AF patients with BPHV. Adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using the random-effects model with an inverse variance method. RESULTS: We selected four randomized clinical trials and seven observational studies (2236 DOAC- and 6403 VKAs-users). Regarding the effectiveness outcomes, there were no significant differences between DOACs and VKAs in stroke or systemic embolism (RR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.50–1.08), ischemic stroke (RR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.76–1.55), all-cause death (RR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.86–1.12), and cardiovascular death (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.40–1.80). In terms of the safety outcomes, DOACs was associated with lower risks of major bleeding (RR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.59–0.82) and intracranial bleeding (RR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.26–0.70), but the risks of any bleeding (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.65–1.13) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.73–1.17) are not significantly different when compared with VKAs. The subgroup analysis with follow-up as a covariate revealed that the DOACs had lower risks of SSE (RR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.37–0.94) and major bleeding (RR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.58–0.81) in patients with a mean follow-up of more than 24 months, but no statistical differences were found in patients with the follow-up less than 24 months (SSE: RR = 1.10, 95%CI: 0.92–1.32; major bleeding: RR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.42–2.01). CONCLUSIONS: In AF with BPHV, patients on DOACs experienced a reduced risk of major bleeding and intracranial bleeding compared with VKAs, while the risks of stroke, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality were similar. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9248967/ /pubmed/35783817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.899906 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cao, Zheng, Li, Liu, Xue, Yin and Luo. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Cao, Yalin
Zheng, Yuxiang
Li, Siyuan
Liu, Fuwei
Xue, Zhengbiao
Yin, Kang
Luo, Jun
An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve
title An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve
title_full An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve
title_fullStr An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve
title_full_unstemmed An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve
title_short An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve
title_sort updated meta-analysis of doacs vs. vkas in atrial fibrillation patients with bioprosthetic heart valve
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9248967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783817
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.899906
work_keys_str_mv AT caoyalin anupdatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve
AT zhengyuxiang anupdatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve
AT lisiyuan anupdatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve
AT liufuwei anupdatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve
AT xuezhengbiao anupdatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve
AT yinkang anupdatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve
AT luojun anupdatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve
AT caoyalin updatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve
AT zhengyuxiang updatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve
AT lisiyuan updatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve
AT liufuwei updatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve
AT xuezhengbiao updatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve
AT yinkang updatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve
AT luojun updatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve