Cargando…
An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the utilization of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal anticoagulation strategy for AF patients with bioprosthetic heart valves (BPHV) remains controversial. Therefore, we cond...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9248967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.899906 |
_version_ | 1784739467413684224 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Yalin Zheng, Yuxiang Li, Siyuan Liu, Fuwei Xue, Zhengbiao Yin, Kang Luo, Jun |
author_facet | Cao, Yalin Zheng, Yuxiang Li, Siyuan Liu, Fuwei Xue, Zhengbiao Yin, Kang Luo, Jun |
author_sort | Cao, Yalin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the utilization of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal anticoagulation strategy for AF patients with bioprosthetic heart valves (BPHV) remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to explore the effect of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this population. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases until November 2021 for studies reporting the effect of DOACs versus VKAs in AF patients with BPHV. Adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using the random-effects model with an inverse variance method. RESULTS: We selected four randomized clinical trials and seven observational studies (2236 DOAC- and 6403 VKAs-users). Regarding the effectiveness outcomes, there were no significant differences between DOACs and VKAs in stroke or systemic embolism (RR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.50–1.08), ischemic stroke (RR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.76–1.55), all-cause death (RR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.86–1.12), and cardiovascular death (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.40–1.80). In terms of the safety outcomes, DOACs was associated with lower risks of major bleeding (RR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.59–0.82) and intracranial bleeding (RR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.26–0.70), but the risks of any bleeding (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.65–1.13) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.73–1.17) are not significantly different when compared with VKAs. The subgroup analysis with follow-up as a covariate revealed that the DOACs had lower risks of SSE (RR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.37–0.94) and major bleeding (RR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.58–0.81) in patients with a mean follow-up of more than 24 months, but no statistical differences were found in patients with the follow-up less than 24 months (SSE: RR = 1.10, 95%CI: 0.92–1.32; major bleeding: RR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.42–2.01). CONCLUSIONS: In AF with BPHV, patients on DOACs experienced a reduced risk of major bleeding and intracranial bleeding compared with VKAs, while the risks of stroke, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality were similar. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9248967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92489672022-07-02 An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Cao, Yalin Zheng, Yuxiang Li, Siyuan Liu, Fuwei Xue, Zhengbiao Yin, Kang Luo, Jun Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the utilization of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal anticoagulation strategy for AF patients with bioprosthetic heart valves (BPHV) remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to explore the effect of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this population. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases until November 2021 for studies reporting the effect of DOACs versus VKAs in AF patients with BPHV. Adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using the random-effects model with an inverse variance method. RESULTS: We selected four randomized clinical trials and seven observational studies (2236 DOAC- and 6403 VKAs-users). Regarding the effectiveness outcomes, there were no significant differences between DOACs and VKAs in stroke or systemic embolism (RR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.50–1.08), ischemic stroke (RR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.76–1.55), all-cause death (RR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.86–1.12), and cardiovascular death (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.40–1.80). In terms of the safety outcomes, DOACs was associated with lower risks of major bleeding (RR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.59–0.82) and intracranial bleeding (RR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.26–0.70), but the risks of any bleeding (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.65–1.13) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.73–1.17) are not significantly different when compared with VKAs. The subgroup analysis with follow-up as a covariate revealed that the DOACs had lower risks of SSE (RR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.37–0.94) and major bleeding (RR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.58–0.81) in patients with a mean follow-up of more than 24 months, but no statistical differences were found in patients with the follow-up less than 24 months (SSE: RR = 1.10, 95%CI: 0.92–1.32; major bleeding: RR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.42–2.01). CONCLUSIONS: In AF with BPHV, patients on DOACs experienced a reduced risk of major bleeding and intracranial bleeding compared with VKAs, while the risks of stroke, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality were similar. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9248967/ /pubmed/35783817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.899906 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cao, Zheng, Li, Liu, Xue, Yin and Luo. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Cao, Yalin Zheng, Yuxiang Li, Siyuan Liu, Fuwei Xue, Zhengbiao Yin, Kang Luo, Jun An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve |
title | An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve |
title_full | An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve |
title_fullStr | An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve |
title_full_unstemmed | An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve |
title_short | An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve |
title_sort | updated meta-analysis of doacs vs. vkas in atrial fibrillation patients with bioprosthetic heart valve |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9248967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.899906 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caoyalin anupdatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve AT zhengyuxiang anupdatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve AT lisiyuan anupdatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve AT liufuwei anupdatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve AT xuezhengbiao anupdatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve AT yinkang anupdatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve AT luojun anupdatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve AT caoyalin updatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve AT zhengyuxiang updatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve AT lisiyuan updatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve AT liufuwei updatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve AT xuezhengbiao updatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve AT yinkang updatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve AT luojun updatedmetaanalysisofdoacsvsvkasinatrialfibrillationpatientswithbioprostheticheartvalve |