Cargando…
Early Total Care Versus Damage Control Orthopedics in Floating Knee Injury: Analysis of Radiological and Functional Outcomes
Introduction Floating knee injury (FKI) occurs as a result of a high-velocity impact. We assessed the radiological and functional outcomes of FKIs treated by various fixation methods, by damage control orthopedics (DCO) or early total care (ETC). Materials and methods We investigated 46 patients wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9249040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35784973 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25615 |
_version_ | 1784739485087432704 |
---|---|
author | Ethiraj, Prabhu Shringeri, Ajay S Prasad P, Arun Shanthappa, Arun H Nagarajan, Vishnudharan |
author_facet | Ethiraj, Prabhu Shringeri, Ajay S Prasad P, Arun Shanthappa, Arun H Nagarajan, Vishnudharan |
author_sort | Ethiraj, Prabhu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Floating knee injury (FKI) occurs as a result of a high-velocity impact. We assessed the radiological and functional outcomes of FKIs treated by various fixation methods, by damage control orthopedics (DCO) or early total care (ETC). Materials and methods We investigated 46 patients with FKI who were operated on between January 2013 and January 2018 at the RL Jalappa Hospital and Research Center, Kolar, India. Functional assessments were evaluated using Karlström and Olerud’s criteria (KOC). Based on their treatments, the patients were divided into the damage control orthopedics group (n = 21) and the ETC group (n = 25). Statistical analyses were used to obtain and compare summary data. Results The data of 46 patients were collected. Fractures were classified using the modified Fraser’s classification. Five patients were not included in the final analysis because of death due to complications in the immediate postoperative period. In patients managed by DCO, after radiological union, the functional outcome was excellent in three cases, good in eight, fair in seven, and poor in two. The average time required for radiological union of the femur was 10.75 ± 1.482 months (P = 0.001); for tibia union, it was 10.25 ± 1.682 months (P = 0.011). The average range of knee flexion was 85°± 16.059° (P = 0.001), which was statistically significant. In patients managed by ETC, there were six cases with an excellent functional outcome, 13 with a good outcome, and two with a fair outcome. The average time required for radiological union of the femur was 9.29 ± 1.765 months (P = 0.006); for the tibia, it was 9.05 ± 1.161 months (P = 0.012). The average range of knee flexion was 100° ± 10.954° (P = 0.001), which was statistically significant. Fat embolism was noted in eight cases; four of these patients died due to multiorgan dysfunction. This was the major life-threatening complication in the early definitive fixation group. In the DCO group, only three cases had fat embolism, with one death due to multiorgan dysfunction. Early postoperative infection was a concern in the ETC group, evident in six cases. Conclusion The classification system for FKI needs further research, which must include multiple parameters. Fracture classification and patient selection are crucial considerations in deciding the best treatment for a particular fracture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9249040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92490402022-07-02 Early Total Care Versus Damage Control Orthopedics in Floating Knee Injury: Analysis of Radiological and Functional Outcomes Ethiraj, Prabhu Shringeri, Ajay S Prasad P, Arun Shanthappa, Arun H Nagarajan, Vishnudharan Cureus Orthopedics Introduction Floating knee injury (FKI) occurs as a result of a high-velocity impact. We assessed the radiological and functional outcomes of FKIs treated by various fixation methods, by damage control orthopedics (DCO) or early total care (ETC). Materials and methods We investigated 46 patients with FKI who were operated on between January 2013 and January 2018 at the RL Jalappa Hospital and Research Center, Kolar, India. Functional assessments were evaluated using Karlström and Olerud’s criteria (KOC). Based on their treatments, the patients were divided into the damage control orthopedics group (n = 21) and the ETC group (n = 25). Statistical analyses were used to obtain and compare summary data. Results The data of 46 patients were collected. Fractures were classified using the modified Fraser’s classification. Five patients were not included in the final analysis because of death due to complications in the immediate postoperative period. In patients managed by DCO, after radiological union, the functional outcome was excellent in three cases, good in eight, fair in seven, and poor in two. The average time required for radiological union of the femur was 10.75 ± 1.482 months (P = 0.001); for tibia union, it was 10.25 ± 1.682 months (P = 0.011). The average range of knee flexion was 85°± 16.059° (P = 0.001), which was statistically significant. In patients managed by ETC, there were six cases with an excellent functional outcome, 13 with a good outcome, and two with a fair outcome. The average time required for radiological union of the femur was 9.29 ± 1.765 months (P = 0.006); for the tibia, it was 9.05 ± 1.161 months (P = 0.012). The average range of knee flexion was 100° ± 10.954° (P = 0.001), which was statistically significant. Fat embolism was noted in eight cases; four of these patients died due to multiorgan dysfunction. This was the major life-threatening complication in the early definitive fixation group. In the DCO group, only three cases had fat embolism, with one death due to multiorgan dysfunction. Early postoperative infection was a concern in the ETC group, evident in six cases. Conclusion The classification system for FKI needs further research, which must include multiple parameters. Fracture classification and patient selection are crucial considerations in deciding the best treatment for a particular fracture. Cureus 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9249040/ /pubmed/35784973 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25615 Text en Copyright © 2022, Ethiraj et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Orthopedics Ethiraj, Prabhu Shringeri, Ajay S Prasad P, Arun Shanthappa, Arun H Nagarajan, Vishnudharan Early Total Care Versus Damage Control Orthopedics in Floating Knee Injury: Analysis of Radiological and Functional Outcomes |
title | Early Total Care Versus Damage Control Orthopedics in Floating Knee Injury: Analysis of Radiological and Functional Outcomes |
title_full | Early Total Care Versus Damage Control Orthopedics in Floating Knee Injury: Analysis of Radiological and Functional Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Early Total Care Versus Damage Control Orthopedics in Floating Knee Injury: Analysis of Radiological and Functional Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Early Total Care Versus Damage Control Orthopedics in Floating Knee Injury: Analysis of Radiological and Functional Outcomes |
title_short | Early Total Care Versus Damage Control Orthopedics in Floating Knee Injury: Analysis of Radiological and Functional Outcomes |
title_sort | early total care versus damage control orthopedics in floating knee injury: analysis of radiological and functional outcomes |
topic | Orthopedics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9249040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35784973 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25615 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ethirajprabhu earlytotalcareversusdamagecontrolorthopedicsinfloatingkneeinjuryanalysisofradiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes AT shringeriajays earlytotalcareversusdamagecontrolorthopedicsinfloatingkneeinjuryanalysisofradiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes AT prasadparun earlytotalcareversusdamagecontrolorthopedicsinfloatingkneeinjuryanalysisofradiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes AT shanthappaarunh earlytotalcareversusdamagecontrolorthopedicsinfloatingkneeinjuryanalysisofradiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes AT nagarajanvishnudharan earlytotalcareversusdamagecontrolorthopedicsinfloatingkneeinjuryanalysisofradiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes |