Cargando…
Impacts of a post-transport/pre-processing rest period on the growth performance, anthelmintic efficacy, and serum metabolite changes in cattle entering a feed yard
A total of 80 crossbred, high-risk heifers (initially 250 ± 4.2 kg BW), were transported from an Oklahoma City, Oklahoma sale barn to the Kansas State University Beef Cattle Research Center. Cattle were unloaded and randomly placed into one of four receiving pens and provided ad libitum hay and wate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9249139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35795068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac085 |
_version_ | 1784739508741210112 |
---|---|
author | Dahmer, Payton L Zumbaugh, Charles A Reeb, Macie E Stafford, Nicole B Buessing, Zachary T Odde, Kenneth G Drouillard, James S Tarpoff, A J Jones, Cassandra K |
author_facet | Dahmer, Payton L Zumbaugh, Charles A Reeb, Macie E Stafford, Nicole B Buessing, Zachary T Odde, Kenneth G Drouillard, James S Tarpoff, A J Jones, Cassandra K |
author_sort | Dahmer, Payton L |
collection | PubMed |
description | A total of 80 crossbred, high-risk heifers (initially 250 ± 4.2 kg BW), were transported from an Oklahoma City, Oklahoma sale barn to the Kansas State University Beef Cattle Research Center. Cattle were unloaded and randomly placed into one of four receiving pens and provided ad libitum hay and water. Each pen was randomly assigned to one of the four rest times before processing: (1) immediately upon arrival (0); (2) after a 6-h rest period (6); (3) after a 24-h rest period (24); and (4) after a 48-h rest period (48). After all cattle were processed, heifers were allotted into individual pens with ad libitum access to a receiving ration and water. Heifers were weighed individually on d 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 to calculate average daily gain (ADG). Feed added and refusals were measured daily to determine dry matter intake (DMI). A fecal egg count reduction test and analysis of blood serum metabolites were also conducted. All data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (v. 9.4, Cary, NC) with individual animal as the experimental unit. Processing time did not impact (P > 0.05) heifer BW or ADG. From d 0 to 35, DMI decreased linearly (P = 0.027) as rest time increased. The number of days for heifers to reach a DMI of 2.5% BW was linearly increased (P = 0.023) as rest time increased. There was no evidence of differences (P ≥ 0.703) among rest times for feed efficiency. While morbidity did not differ between treatments (P > 0.10), mortality increased linearly (P = 0.026) as the time of rest increased. A significant processing time × day interaction (P < 0.0001) was observed for the prevalence of fecal parasites, where the percentage of positive samples was significantly lower 14-d after anthelmintic treatment, regardless of the processing time. Serum IBR titer for heifers processed at either 0 or 6-h upon arrival was significantly higher (P < 0.01) on d 35 compared to d 0. Heifers processed after a 48-h rest period had significantly higher glucose values (P < 0.01) on d 0 compared to heifers processed at 0, 6, or 24-h. In summary, rest time prior to processing did not impact receiving calf growth performance. A 6-h rest period upon arrival appeared to be most beneficial to DMI. Anthelmintic treatment at processing reduced the parasitic load in heifers processed at all times. Vaccine titer did not increase after initial processing in heifers processed 24- or 48-h after arrival, indicating the seroconversion of IBR antibodies during the longer rest period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9249139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92491392022-07-05 Impacts of a post-transport/pre-processing rest period on the growth performance, anthelmintic efficacy, and serum metabolite changes in cattle entering a feed yard Dahmer, Payton L Zumbaugh, Charles A Reeb, Macie E Stafford, Nicole B Buessing, Zachary T Odde, Kenneth G Drouillard, James S Tarpoff, A J Jones, Cassandra K Transl Anim Sci Animal Health and Well Being A total of 80 crossbred, high-risk heifers (initially 250 ± 4.2 kg BW), were transported from an Oklahoma City, Oklahoma sale barn to the Kansas State University Beef Cattle Research Center. Cattle were unloaded and randomly placed into one of four receiving pens and provided ad libitum hay and water. Each pen was randomly assigned to one of the four rest times before processing: (1) immediately upon arrival (0); (2) after a 6-h rest period (6); (3) after a 24-h rest period (24); and (4) after a 48-h rest period (48). After all cattle were processed, heifers were allotted into individual pens with ad libitum access to a receiving ration and water. Heifers were weighed individually on d 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 to calculate average daily gain (ADG). Feed added and refusals were measured daily to determine dry matter intake (DMI). A fecal egg count reduction test and analysis of blood serum metabolites were also conducted. All data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (v. 9.4, Cary, NC) with individual animal as the experimental unit. Processing time did not impact (P > 0.05) heifer BW or ADG. From d 0 to 35, DMI decreased linearly (P = 0.027) as rest time increased. The number of days for heifers to reach a DMI of 2.5% BW was linearly increased (P = 0.023) as rest time increased. There was no evidence of differences (P ≥ 0.703) among rest times for feed efficiency. While morbidity did not differ between treatments (P > 0.10), mortality increased linearly (P = 0.026) as the time of rest increased. A significant processing time × day interaction (P < 0.0001) was observed for the prevalence of fecal parasites, where the percentage of positive samples was significantly lower 14-d after anthelmintic treatment, regardless of the processing time. Serum IBR titer for heifers processed at either 0 or 6-h upon arrival was significantly higher (P < 0.01) on d 35 compared to d 0. Heifers processed after a 48-h rest period had significantly higher glucose values (P < 0.01) on d 0 compared to heifers processed at 0, 6, or 24-h. In summary, rest time prior to processing did not impact receiving calf growth performance. A 6-h rest period upon arrival appeared to be most beneficial to DMI. Anthelmintic treatment at processing reduced the parasitic load in heifers processed at all times. Vaccine titer did not increase after initial processing in heifers processed 24- or 48-h after arrival, indicating the seroconversion of IBR antibodies during the longer rest period. Oxford University Press 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9249139/ /pubmed/35795068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac085 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Animal Health and Well Being Dahmer, Payton L Zumbaugh, Charles A Reeb, Macie E Stafford, Nicole B Buessing, Zachary T Odde, Kenneth G Drouillard, James S Tarpoff, A J Jones, Cassandra K Impacts of a post-transport/pre-processing rest period on the growth performance, anthelmintic efficacy, and serum metabolite changes in cattle entering a feed yard |
title | Impacts of a post-transport/pre-processing rest period on the growth performance, anthelmintic efficacy, and serum metabolite changes in cattle entering a feed yard |
title_full | Impacts of a post-transport/pre-processing rest period on the growth performance, anthelmintic efficacy, and serum metabolite changes in cattle entering a feed yard |
title_fullStr | Impacts of a post-transport/pre-processing rest period on the growth performance, anthelmintic efficacy, and serum metabolite changes in cattle entering a feed yard |
title_full_unstemmed | Impacts of a post-transport/pre-processing rest period on the growth performance, anthelmintic efficacy, and serum metabolite changes in cattle entering a feed yard |
title_short | Impacts of a post-transport/pre-processing rest period on the growth performance, anthelmintic efficacy, and serum metabolite changes in cattle entering a feed yard |
title_sort | impacts of a post-transport/pre-processing rest period on the growth performance, anthelmintic efficacy, and serum metabolite changes in cattle entering a feed yard |
topic | Animal Health and Well Being |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9249139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35795068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dahmerpaytonl impactsofaposttransportpreprocessingrestperiodonthegrowthperformanceanthelminticefficacyandserummetabolitechangesincattleenteringafeedyard AT zumbaughcharlesa impactsofaposttransportpreprocessingrestperiodonthegrowthperformanceanthelminticefficacyandserummetabolitechangesincattleenteringafeedyard AT reebmaciee impactsofaposttransportpreprocessingrestperiodonthegrowthperformanceanthelminticefficacyandserummetabolitechangesincattleenteringafeedyard AT staffordnicoleb impactsofaposttransportpreprocessingrestperiodonthegrowthperformanceanthelminticefficacyandserummetabolitechangesincattleenteringafeedyard AT buessingzacharyt impactsofaposttransportpreprocessingrestperiodonthegrowthperformanceanthelminticefficacyandserummetabolitechangesincattleenteringafeedyard AT oddekennethg impactsofaposttransportpreprocessingrestperiodonthegrowthperformanceanthelminticefficacyandserummetabolitechangesincattleenteringafeedyard AT drouillardjamess impactsofaposttransportpreprocessingrestperiodonthegrowthperformanceanthelminticefficacyandserummetabolitechangesincattleenteringafeedyard AT tarpoffaj impactsofaposttransportpreprocessingrestperiodonthegrowthperformanceanthelminticefficacyandserummetabolitechangesincattleenteringafeedyard AT jonescassandrak impactsofaposttransportpreprocessingrestperiodonthegrowthperformanceanthelminticefficacyandserummetabolitechangesincattleenteringafeedyard |