Cargando…

A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions

Carbohydrates are the major component of most ruminant feeds. The digestion of carbohydrates in the rumen provides energy to the ruminants but also contributes to enteric methane (CH(4)) emissions. Fresh forage is the main feed for grazing ruminants in temperate regions. Therefore, this review explo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Xuezhao, Cheng, Long, Jonker, Arjan, Munidasa, Sineka, Pacheco, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9249355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35782553
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.880115
_version_ 1784739562518478848
author Sun, Xuezhao
Cheng, Long
Jonker, Arjan
Munidasa, Sineka
Pacheco, David
author_facet Sun, Xuezhao
Cheng, Long
Jonker, Arjan
Munidasa, Sineka
Pacheco, David
author_sort Sun, Xuezhao
collection PubMed
description Carbohydrates are the major component of most ruminant feeds. The digestion of carbohydrates in the rumen provides energy to the ruminants but also contributes to enteric methane (CH(4)) emissions. Fresh forage is the main feed for grazing ruminants in temperate regions. Therefore, this review explored how dietary carbohydrate type and digestion affect ruminant CH(4) emissions, with a focus on fresh forage grown in temperate regions. Carbohydrates include monosaccharides, disaccharides, oligosaccharides, and polysaccharides. Rhamnose is the only monosaccharide that results in low CH(4) emissions. However, rhamnose is a minor component in most plants. Among polysaccharides, pectic polysaccharides lead to greater CH(4) production due to the conversion of methyl groups to methanol and finally to CH(4). Thus, the degree of methyl esterification of pectic polysaccharides is an important structural characteristic to better understand CH(4) emissions. Apart from pectic polysaccharides, the chemical structure of other polysaccharides per se does not seem to affect CH(4) formation. However, rumen physiological parameters and fermentation types resulting from digestion in the rumen of polysaccharides differing in the rate and extent of degradation do affect CH(4) emissions. For example, low rumen pH resulting from the rapid degradation of readily fermentable carbohydrates decreases and inhibits the activities of methanogens and further reduces CH(4) emissions. When a large quantity of starch is supplemented or the rate of starch degradation is low, some starch may escape from the rumen and the escaped starch will not yield CH(4). Similar bypass from rumen digestion applies to other polysaccharides and needs to be quantified to facilitate the interpretation of animal experiments in which CH(4) emissions are measured. Rumen bypass carbohydrates may occur in ruminants fed fresh forage, especially when the passage rate is high, which could be a result of high feed intake or high water intake. The type of carbohydrates affects the concentration of dissolved hydrogen, which consequently alters fermentation pathways and finally results in differences in CH(4) emissions. We recommend that the degree of methyl esterification of pectic polysaccharides is needed for pectin-rich forage. The fermentation type of carbohydrates and rumen bypass carbohydrates should be determined in the assessment of mitigation potential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9249355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92493552022-07-02 A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions Sun, Xuezhao Cheng, Long Jonker, Arjan Munidasa, Sineka Pacheco, David Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Carbohydrates are the major component of most ruminant feeds. The digestion of carbohydrates in the rumen provides energy to the ruminants but also contributes to enteric methane (CH(4)) emissions. Fresh forage is the main feed for grazing ruminants in temperate regions. Therefore, this review explored how dietary carbohydrate type and digestion affect ruminant CH(4) emissions, with a focus on fresh forage grown in temperate regions. Carbohydrates include monosaccharides, disaccharides, oligosaccharides, and polysaccharides. Rhamnose is the only monosaccharide that results in low CH(4) emissions. However, rhamnose is a minor component in most plants. Among polysaccharides, pectic polysaccharides lead to greater CH(4) production due to the conversion of methyl groups to methanol and finally to CH(4). Thus, the degree of methyl esterification of pectic polysaccharides is an important structural characteristic to better understand CH(4) emissions. Apart from pectic polysaccharides, the chemical structure of other polysaccharides per se does not seem to affect CH(4) formation. However, rumen physiological parameters and fermentation types resulting from digestion in the rumen of polysaccharides differing in the rate and extent of degradation do affect CH(4) emissions. For example, low rumen pH resulting from the rapid degradation of readily fermentable carbohydrates decreases and inhibits the activities of methanogens and further reduces CH(4) emissions. When a large quantity of starch is supplemented or the rate of starch degradation is low, some starch may escape from the rumen and the escaped starch will not yield CH(4). Similar bypass from rumen digestion applies to other polysaccharides and needs to be quantified to facilitate the interpretation of animal experiments in which CH(4) emissions are measured. Rumen bypass carbohydrates may occur in ruminants fed fresh forage, especially when the passage rate is high, which could be a result of high feed intake or high water intake. The type of carbohydrates affects the concentration of dissolved hydrogen, which consequently alters fermentation pathways and finally results in differences in CH(4) emissions. We recommend that the degree of methyl esterification of pectic polysaccharides is needed for pectin-rich forage. The fermentation type of carbohydrates and rumen bypass carbohydrates should be determined in the assessment of mitigation potential. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9249355/ /pubmed/35782553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.880115 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sun, Cheng, Jonker, Munidasa and Pacheco. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Sun, Xuezhao
Cheng, Long
Jonker, Arjan
Munidasa, Sineka
Pacheco, David
A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions
title A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions
title_full A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions
title_fullStr A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions
title_full_unstemmed A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions
title_short A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions
title_sort review: plant carbohydrate types—the potential impact on ruminant methane emissions
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9249355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35782553
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.880115
work_keys_str_mv AT sunxuezhao areviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions
AT chenglong areviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions
AT jonkerarjan areviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions
AT munidasasineka areviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions
AT pachecodavid areviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions
AT sunxuezhao reviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions
AT chenglong reviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions
AT jonkerarjan reviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions
AT munidasasineka reviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions
AT pachecodavid reviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions