Cargando…
A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions
Carbohydrates are the major component of most ruminant feeds. The digestion of carbohydrates in the rumen provides energy to the ruminants but also contributes to enteric methane (CH(4)) emissions. Fresh forage is the main feed for grazing ruminants in temperate regions. Therefore, this review explo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9249355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35782553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.880115 |
_version_ | 1784739562518478848 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Xuezhao Cheng, Long Jonker, Arjan Munidasa, Sineka Pacheco, David |
author_facet | Sun, Xuezhao Cheng, Long Jonker, Arjan Munidasa, Sineka Pacheco, David |
author_sort | Sun, Xuezhao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Carbohydrates are the major component of most ruminant feeds. The digestion of carbohydrates in the rumen provides energy to the ruminants but also contributes to enteric methane (CH(4)) emissions. Fresh forage is the main feed for grazing ruminants in temperate regions. Therefore, this review explored how dietary carbohydrate type and digestion affect ruminant CH(4) emissions, with a focus on fresh forage grown in temperate regions. Carbohydrates include monosaccharides, disaccharides, oligosaccharides, and polysaccharides. Rhamnose is the only monosaccharide that results in low CH(4) emissions. However, rhamnose is a minor component in most plants. Among polysaccharides, pectic polysaccharides lead to greater CH(4) production due to the conversion of methyl groups to methanol and finally to CH(4). Thus, the degree of methyl esterification of pectic polysaccharides is an important structural characteristic to better understand CH(4) emissions. Apart from pectic polysaccharides, the chemical structure of other polysaccharides per se does not seem to affect CH(4) formation. However, rumen physiological parameters and fermentation types resulting from digestion in the rumen of polysaccharides differing in the rate and extent of degradation do affect CH(4) emissions. For example, low rumen pH resulting from the rapid degradation of readily fermentable carbohydrates decreases and inhibits the activities of methanogens and further reduces CH(4) emissions. When a large quantity of starch is supplemented or the rate of starch degradation is low, some starch may escape from the rumen and the escaped starch will not yield CH(4). Similar bypass from rumen digestion applies to other polysaccharides and needs to be quantified to facilitate the interpretation of animal experiments in which CH(4) emissions are measured. Rumen bypass carbohydrates may occur in ruminants fed fresh forage, especially when the passage rate is high, which could be a result of high feed intake or high water intake. The type of carbohydrates affects the concentration of dissolved hydrogen, which consequently alters fermentation pathways and finally results in differences in CH(4) emissions. We recommend that the degree of methyl esterification of pectic polysaccharides is needed for pectin-rich forage. The fermentation type of carbohydrates and rumen bypass carbohydrates should be determined in the assessment of mitigation potential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9249355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92493552022-07-02 A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions Sun, Xuezhao Cheng, Long Jonker, Arjan Munidasa, Sineka Pacheco, David Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Carbohydrates are the major component of most ruminant feeds. The digestion of carbohydrates in the rumen provides energy to the ruminants but also contributes to enteric methane (CH(4)) emissions. Fresh forage is the main feed for grazing ruminants in temperate regions. Therefore, this review explored how dietary carbohydrate type and digestion affect ruminant CH(4) emissions, with a focus on fresh forage grown in temperate regions. Carbohydrates include monosaccharides, disaccharides, oligosaccharides, and polysaccharides. Rhamnose is the only monosaccharide that results in low CH(4) emissions. However, rhamnose is a minor component in most plants. Among polysaccharides, pectic polysaccharides lead to greater CH(4) production due to the conversion of methyl groups to methanol and finally to CH(4). Thus, the degree of methyl esterification of pectic polysaccharides is an important structural characteristic to better understand CH(4) emissions. Apart from pectic polysaccharides, the chemical structure of other polysaccharides per se does not seem to affect CH(4) formation. However, rumen physiological parameters and fermentation types resulting from digestion in the rumen of polysaccharides differing in the rate and extent of degradation do affect CH(4) emissions. For example, low rumen pH resulting from the rapid degradation of readily fermentable carbohydrates decreases and inhibits the activities of methanogens and further reduces CH(4) emissions. When a large quantity of starch is supplemented or the rate of starch degradation is low, some starch may escape from the rumen and the escaped starch will not yield CH(4). Similar bypass from rumen digestion applies to other polysaccharides and needs to be quantified to facilitate the interpretation of animal experiments in which CH(4) emissions are measured. Rumen bypass carbohydrates may occur in ruminants fed fresh forage, especially when the passage rate is high, which could be a result of high feed intake or high water intake. The type of carbohydrates affects the concentration of dissolved hydrogen, which consequently alters fermentation pathways and finally results in differences in CH(4) emissions. We recommend that the degree of methyl esterification of pectic polysaccharides is needed for pectin-rich forage. The fermentation type of carbohydrates and rumen bypass carbohydrates should be determined in the assessment of mitigation potential. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9249355/ /pubmed/35782553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.880115 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sun, Cheng, Jonker, Munidasa and Pacheco. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Sun, Xuezhao Cheng, Long Jonker, Arjan Munidasa, Sineka Pacheco, David A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions |
title | A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions |
title_full | A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions |
title_fullStr | A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions |
title_short | A Review: Plant Carbohydrate Types—The Potential Impact on Ruminant Methane Emissions |
title_sort | review: plant carbohydrate types—the potential impact on ruminant methane emissions |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9249355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35782553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.880115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunxuezhao areviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions AT chenglong areviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions AT jonkerarjan areviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions AT munidasasineka areviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions AT pachecodavid areviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions AT sunxuezhao reviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions AT chenglong reviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions AT jonkerarjan reviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions AT munidasasineka reviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions AT pachecodavid reviewplantcarbohydratetypesthepotentialimpactonruminantmethaneemissions |