Cargando…
Insights from one thousand cloned dogs
Animal cloning has been popularized for more than two decades, since the birth of Dolly the Sheep 25 years ago in 1996. There has been an apparent waning of interest in cloning, evident by a reduced number of reports. Over 1500 dogs, representing approximately 20% of the American Kennel Club’s recog...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9249891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35778582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15097-7 |
_version_ | 1784739688711454720 |
---|---|
author | Olsson, P. Olof Jeong, Yeon Woo Jeong, Yeonik Kang, Mina Park, Gang Bae Choi, Eunji Kim, Sun Hossein, Mohammed Shamim Son, Young-Bum Hwang, Woo Suk |
author_facet | Olsson, P. Olof Jeong, Yeon Woo Jeong, Yeonik Kang, Mina Park, Gang Bae Choi, Eunji Kim, Sun Hossein, Mohammed Shamim Son, Young-Bum Hwang, Woo Suk |
author_sort | Olsson, P. Olof |
collection | PubMed |
description | Animal cloning has been popularized for more than two decades, since the birth of Dolly the Sheep 25 years ago in 1996. There has been an apparent waning of interest in cloning, evident by a reduced number of reports. Over 1500 dogs, representing approximately 20% of the American Kennel Club’s recognized breeds, have now been cloned, making the dog (Canis familiaris) one of the most successfully cloned mammals. Dogs have a unique relationship with humans, dating to prehistory, and a high degree of genome homology to humans. A number of phenotypic variations, rarely recorded in natural reproduction have been observed in in these more than 1000 clones. These observations differ between donors and their clones, and between clones from the same donor, indicating a non-genetic effect. These differences cannot be fully explained by current understandings but point to epigenetic and cellular reprograming effects of somatic cell nuclear transfer. Notably, some phenotypic variations have been reversed through further cloning. Here we summarize these observations and elaborate on the cloning procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9249891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92498912022-07-03 Insights from one thousand cloned dogs Olsson, P. Olof Jeong, Yeon Woo Jeong, Yeonik Kang, Mina Park, Gang Bae Choi, Eunji Kim, Sun Hossein, Mohammed Shamim Son, Young-Bum Hwang, Woo Suk Sci Rep Article Animal cloning has been popularized for more than two decades, since the birth of Dolly the Sheep 25 years ago in 1996. There has been an apparent waning of interest in cloning, evident by a reduced number of reports. Over 1500 dogs, representing approximately 20% of the American Kennel Club’s recognized breeds, have now been cloned, making the dog (Canis familiaris) one of the most successfully cloned mammals. Dogs have a unique relationship with humans, dating to prehistory, and a high degree of genome homology to humans. A number of phenotypic variations, rarely recorded in natural reproduction have been observed in in these more than 1000 clones. These observations differ between donors and their clones, and between clones from the same donor, indicating a non-genetic effect. These differences cannot be fully explained by current understandings but point to epigenetic and cellular reprograming effects of somatic cell nuclear transfer. Notably, some phenotypic variations have been reversed through further cloning. Here we summarize these observations and elaborate on the cloning procedure. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9249891/ /pubmed/35778582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15097-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Olsson, P. Olof Jeong, Yeon Woo Jeong, Yeonik Kang, Mina Park, Gang Bae Choi, Eunji Kim, Sun Hossein, Mohammed Shamim Son, Young-Bum Hwang, Woo Suk Insights from one thousand cloned dogs |
title | Insights from one thousand cloned dogs |
title_full | Insights from one thousand cloned dogs |
title_fullStr | Insights from one thousand cloned dogs |
title_full_unstemmed | Insights from one thousand cloned dogs |
title_short | Insights from one thousand cloned dogs |
title_sort | insights from one thousand cloned dogs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9249891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35778582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15097-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olssonpolof insightsfromonethousandcloneddogs AT jeongyeonwoo insightsfromonethousandcloneddogs AT jeongyeonik insightsfromonethousandcloneddogs AT kangmina insightsfromonethousandcloneddogs AT parkgangbae insightsfromonethousandcloneddogs AT choieunji insightsfromonethousandcloneddogs AT kimsun insightsfromonethousandcloneddogs AT hosseinmohammedshamim insightsfromonethousandcloneddogs AT sonyoungbum insightsfromonethousandcloneddogs AT hwangwoosuk insightsfromonethousandcloneddogs |