Cargando…
Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method
BACKGROUND: Take-Home Naloxone (THN) is a core intervention aimed at addressing the toxic illicit opioid drug supply crisis. Although THN programs are available in all provinces and territories throughout Canada, there are currently no standardized guidelines for THN programs. The Delphi method is a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35780136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00650-4 |
_version_ | 1784739775984435200 |
---|---|
author | Ferguson, Max Medley, Andrea Rittenbach, Katherine Brothers, Thomas D. Strike, Carol Ng, Justin Leece, Pamela Elton-Marshall, Tara Ali, Farihah Lorenzetti, Diane L. Buxton, Jane A. |
author_facet | Ferguson, Max Medley, Andrea Rittenbach, Katherine Brothers, Thomas D. Strike, Carol Ng, Justin Leece, Pamela Elton-Marshall, Tara Ali, Farihah Lorenzetti, Diane L. Buxton, Jane A. |
author_sort | Ferguson, Max |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Take-Home Naloxone (THN) is a core intervention aimed at addressing the toxic illicit opioid drug supply crisis. Although THN programs are available in all provinces and territories throughout Canada, there are currently no standardized guidelines for THN programs. The Delphi method is a tool for consensus building often used in policy development that allows for engagement of stakeholders. METHODS: We used an adapted anonymous online Delphi method to elicit priorities for a Canadian guideline on THN as a means of facilitating meaningful stakeholder engagement. A guideline development group generated a series of key questions that were then brought to a 15-member voting panel. The voting panel was comprised of people with lived and living experience of substance use, academics specializing in harm reduction, and clinicians and public health professionals from across Canada. Two rounds of voting were undertaken to score questions on importance for inclusion in the guideline. RESULTS: Nine questions that were identified as most important include what equipment should be in THN kits, whether there are important differences between intramuscular and intranasal naloxone administration, how stigma impacts access to distribution programs, how effective THN programs are at saving lives, what distribution models are most effective and equitable, storage considerations for naloxone in a community setting, the role of CPR and rescue breathing in overdose response, client preference of naloxone distribution program type, and what aftercare should be provided for people who respond to overdoses. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi method is an equitable consensus building process that generated priorities to guide guideline development. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-022-00650-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9250272 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92502722022-07-03 Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method Ferguson, Max Medley, Andrea Rittenbach, Katherine Brothers, Thomas D. Strike, Carol Ng, Justin Leece, Pamela Elton-Marshall, Tara Ali, Farihah Lorenzetti, Diane L. Buxton, Jane A. Harm Reduct J Research BACKGROUND: Take-Home Naloxone (THN) is a core intervention aimed at addressing the toxic illicit opioid drug supply crisis. Although THN programs are available in all provinces and territories throughout Canada, there are currently no standardized guidelines for THN programs. The Delphi method is a tool for consensus building often used in policy development that allows for engagement of stakeholders. METHODS: We used an adapted anonymous online Delphi method to elicit priorities for a Canadian guideline on THN as a means of facilitating meaningful stakeholder engagement. A guideline development group generated a series of key questions that were then brought to a 15-member voting panel. The voting panel was comprised of people with lived and living experience of substance use, academics specializing in harm reduction, and clinicians and public health professionals from across Canada. Two rounds of voting were undertaken to score questions on importance for inclusion in the guideline. RESULTS: Nine questions that were identified as most important include what equipment should be in THN kits, whether there are important differences between intramuscular and intranasal naloxone administration, how stigma impacts access to distribution programs, how effective THN programs are at saving lives, what distribution models are most effective and equitable, storage considerations for naloxone in a community setting, the role of CPR and rescue breathing in overdose response, client preference of naloxone distribution program type, and what aftercare should be provided for people who respond to overdoses. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi method is an equitable consensus building process that generated priorities to guide guideline development. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-022-00650-4. BioMed Central 2022-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9250272/ /pubmed/35780136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00650-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ferguson, Max Medley, Andrea Rittenbach, Katherine Brothers, Thomas D. Strike, Carol Ng, Justin Leece, Pamela Elton-Marshall, Tara Ali, Farihah Lorenzetti, Diane L. Buxton, Jane A. Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method |
title | Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method |
title_full | Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method |
title_fullStr | Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method |
title_full_unstemmed | Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method |
title_short | Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method |
title_sort | priority setting for canadian take-home naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online delphi method |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35780136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00650-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fergusonmax prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod AT medleyandrea prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod AT rittenbachkatherine prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod AT brothersthomasd prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod AT strikecarol prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod AT ngjustin prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod AT leecepamela prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod AT eltonmarshalltara prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod AT alifarihah prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod AT lorenzettidianel prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod AT buxtonjanea prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod |