Cargando…

Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method

BACKGROUND: Take-Home Naloxone (THN) is a core intervention aimed at addressing the toxic illicit opioid drug supply crisis. Although THN programs are available in all provinces and territories throughout Canada, there are currently no standardized guidelines for THN programs. The Delphi method is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferguson, Max, Medley, Andrea, Rittenbach, Katherine, Brothers, Thomas D., Strike, Carol, Ng, Justin, Leece, Pamela, Elton-Marshall, Tara, Ali, Farihah, Lorenzetti, Diane L., Buxton, Jane A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35780136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00650-4
_version_ 1784739775984435200
author Ferguson, Max
Medley, Andrea
Rittenbach, Katherine
Brothers, Thomas D.
Strike, Carol
Ng, Justin
Leece, Pamela
Elton-Marshall, Tara
Ali, Farihah
Lorenzetti, Diane L.
Buxton, Jane A.
author_facet Ferguson, Max
Medley, Andrea
Rittenbach, Katherine
Brothers, Thomas D.
Strike, Carol
Ng, Justin
Leece, Pamela
Elton-Marshall, Tara
Ali, Farihah
Lorenzetti, Diane L.
Buxton, Jane A.
author_sort Ferguson, Max
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Take-Home Naloxone (THN) is a core intervention aimed at addressing the toxic illicit opioid drug supply crisis. Although THN programs are available in all provinces and territories throughout Canada, there are currently no standardized guidelines for THN programs. The Delphi method is a tool for consensus building often used in policy development that allows for engagement of stakeholders. METHODS: We used an adapted anonymous online Delphi method to elicit priorities for a Canadian guideline on THN as a means of facilitating meaningful stakeholder engagement. A guideline development group generated a series of key questions that were then brought to a 15-member voting panel. The voting panel was comprised of people with lived and living experience of substance use, academics specializing in harm reduction, and clinicians and public health professionals from across Canada. Two rounds of voting were undertaken to score questions on importance for inclusion in the guideline. RESULTS: Nine questions that were identified as most important include what equipment should be in THN kits, whether there are important differences between intramuscular and intranasal naloxone administration, how stigma impacts access to distribution programs, how effective THN programs are at saving lives, what distribution models are most effective and equitable, storage considerations for naloxone in a community setting, the role of CPR and rescue breathing in overdose response, client preference of naloxone distribution program type, and what aftercare should be provided for people who respond to overdoses. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi method is an equitable consensus building process that generated priorities to guide guideline development. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-022-00650-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9250272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92502722022-07-03 Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method Ferguson, Max Medley, Andrea Rittenbach, Katherine Brothers, Thomas D. Strike, Carol Ng, Justin Leece, Pamela Elton-Marshall, Tara Ali, Farihah Lorenzetti, Diane L. Buxton, Jane A. Harm Reduct J Research BACKGROUND: Take-Home Naloxone (THN) is a core intervention aimed at addressing the toxic illicit opioid drug supply crisis. Although THN programs are available in all provinces and territories throughout Canada, there are currently no standardized guidelines for THN programs. The Delphi method is a tool for consensus building often used in policy development that allows for engagement of stakeholders. METHODS: We used an adapted anonymous online Delphi method to elicit priorities for a Canadian guideline on THN as a means of facilitating meaningful stakeholder engagement. A guideline development group generated a series of key questions that were then brought to a 15-member voting panel. The voting panel was comprised of people with lived and living experience of substance use, academics specializing in harm reduction, and clinicians and public health professionals from across Canada. Two rounds of voting were undertaken to score questions on importance for inclusion in the guideline. RESULTS: Nine questions that were identified as most important include what equipment should be in THN kits, whether there are important differences between intramuscular and intranasal naloxone administration, how stigma impacts access to distribution programs, how effective THN programs are at saving lives, what distribution models are most effective and equitable, storage considerations for naloxone in a community setting, the role of CPR and rescue breathing in overdose response, client preference of naloxone distribution program type, and what aftercare should be provided for people who respond to overdoses. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi method is an equitable consensus building process that generated priorities to guide guideline development. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-022-00650-4. BioMed Central 2022-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9250272/ /pubmed/35780136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00650-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ferguson, Max
Medley, Andrea
Rittenbach, Katherine
Brothers, Thomas D.
Strike, Carol
Ng, Justin
Leece, Pamela
Elton-Marshall, Tara
Ali, Farihah
Lorenzetti, Diane L.
Buxton, Jane A.
Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method
title Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method
title_full Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method
title_fullStr Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method
title_full_unstemmed Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method
title_short Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method
title_sort priority setting for canadian take-home naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online delphi method
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35780136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00650-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fergusonmax prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod
AT medleyandrea prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod
AT rittenbachkatherine prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod
AT brothersthomasd prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod
AT strikecarol prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod
AT ngjustin prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod
AT leecepamela prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod
AT eltonmarshalltara prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod
AT alifarihah prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod
AT lorenzettidianel prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod
AT buxtonjanea prioritysettingforcanadiantakehomenaloxonebestpracticeguidelinedevelopmentanadaptedonlinedelphimethod