Cargando…
Agricultural big data and methods and models for food security analysis—a mini-review
BACKGROUND: Big data and data analysis methods and models are important tools in food security (FS) studies for gap analysis and preparation of appropriate analytical frameworks. These innovations necessitate the development of novel methods for collecting, storing, processing, and extracting data....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35789661 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13674 |
_version_ | 1784739782145867776 |
---|---|
author | Ammar, Khalil A. Kheir, Ahmed M.S. Manikas, Ioannis |
author_facet | Ammar, Khalil A. Kheir, Ahmed M.S. Manikas, Ioannis |
author_sort | Ammar, Khalil A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Big data and data analysis methods and models are important tools in food security (FS) studies for gap analysis and preparation of appropriate analytical frameworks. These innovations necessitate the development of novel methods for collecting, storing, processing, and extracting data. METHODOLOGY: The primary goal of this study was to conduct a critical review of agricultural big data and methods and models used for FS studies published in peer-reviewed journals since 2010. Approximately 130 articles were selected for full content review after the pre-screening process. RESULTS: There are different sources of data collection, including but not limited to online databases, the internet, omics, Internet of Things, social media, survey rounds, remote sensing, and the Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database. The collected data require analysis (i.e., mining, neural networks, Bayesian networks, and other ML algorithms) before data visualization using Python, R, Circos, Gephi, Tableau, or Cytoscape. Approximately 122 models, all of which were used in FS studies worldwide, were selected from 130 articles. However, most of these models addressed only one or two dimensions of FS (i.e., availability and access) and ignored the other dimensions (i.e., stability and utilization), creating a gap in the global context. CONCLUSIONS: There are certain FS gaps both worldwide and in the United Arab Emirates that need to be addressed by scientists and policymakers. Following the identification of the drivers, policies, and indicators, the findings of this review could be used to develop an appropriate analytical framework for FS and nutrition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9250308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92503082022-07-03 Agricultural big data and methods and models for food security analysis—a mini-review Ammar, Khalil A. Kheir, Ahmed M.S. Manikas, Ioannis PeerJ Agricultural Science BACKGROUND: Big data and data analysis methods and models are important tools in food security (FS) studies for gap analysis and preparation of appropriate analytical frameworks. These innovations necessitate the development of novel methods for collecting, storing, processing, and extracting data. METHODOLOGY: The primary goal of this study was to conduct a critical review of agricultural big data and methods and models used for FS studies published in peer-reviewed journals since 2010. Approximately 130 articles were selected for full content review after the pre-screening process. RESULTS: There are different sources of data collection, including but not limited to online databases, the internet, omics, Internet of Things, social media, survey rounds, remote sensing, and the Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database. The collected data require analysis (i.e., mining, neural networks, Bayesian networks, and other ML algorithms) before data visualization using Python, R, Circos, Gephi, Tableau, or Cytoscape. Approximately 122 models, all of which were used in FS studies worldwide, were selected from 130 articles. However, most of these models addressed only one or two dimensions of FS (i.e., availability and access) and ignored the other dimensions (i.e., stability and utilization), creating a gap in the global context. CONCLUSIONS: There are certain FS gaps both worldwide and in the United Arab Emirates that need to be addressed by scientists and policymakers. Following the identification of the drivers, policies, and indicators, the findings of this review could be used to develop an appropriate analytical framework for FS and nutrition. PeerJ Inc. 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9250308/ /pubmed/35789661 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13674 Text en ©2022 Ammar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Agricultural Science Ammar, Khalil A. Kheir, Ahmed M.S. Manikas, Ioannis Agricultural big data and methods and models for food security analysis—a mini-review |
title | Agricultural big data and methods and models for food security analysis—a mini-review |
title_full | Agricultural big data and methods and models for food security analysis—a mini-review |
title_fullStr | Agricultural big data and methods and models for food security analysis—a mini-review |
title_full_unstemmed | Agricultural big data and methods and models for food security analysis—a mini-review |
title_short | Agricultural big data and methods and models for food security analysis—a mini-review |
title_sort | agricultural big data and methods and models for food security analysis—a mini-review |
topic | Agricultural Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35789661 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13674 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ammarkhalila agriculturalbigdataandmethodsandmodelsforfoodsecurityanalysisaminireview AT kheirahmedms agriculturalbigdataandmethodsandmodelsforfoodsecurityanalysisaminireview AT manikasioannis agriculturalbigdataandmethodsandmodelsforfoodsecurityanalysisaminireview |