Cargando…

The integrated nuclear medicine and radiology residency program in the Netherlands: strengths and potential areas for improvement according to nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists

PURPOSE: To evaluate the Dutch integrated nuclear medicine and radiology residency program from the perspective of nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists. METHODS: A survey was distributed among nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists in hospitals that participate in the Dutch integrated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velleman, Ton, Kwee, Thomas C., Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O., Ongena, Yfke P., Noordzij, Walter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05699-8
_version_ 1784739818164453376
author Velleman, Ton
Kwee, Thomas C.
Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O.
Ongena, Yfke P.
Noordzij, Walter
author_facet Velleman, Ton
Kwee, Thomas C.
Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O.
Ongena, Yfke P.
Noordzij, Walter
author_sort Velleman, Ton
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the Dutch integrated nuclear medicine and radiology residency program from the perspective of nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists. METHODS: A survey was distributed among nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists in hospitals that participate in the Dutch integrated nuclear medicine and radiology training program. RESULTS: A total of 139 completed questionnaires were included. Nuclear medicine physicians (n = 36) assigned a mean score of 5.7 ± 2.0, and radiologists (n = 103) assigned a mean score of 6.5 ± 2.8 (on a 1–10 scale) to the success of the integrated training program in their hospital. On multiple regression, female gender of the survey participant (B = 2.22, P = 0.034), musculoskeletal radiology as subspecialty of the survey participant (B = 3.36, P = 0.032), and the survey participant’s expectancy of resident’s ability to handle workload after completion of residency were significantly associated with perceived success of the integrated training program (B = 1.16, P = 0.023). Perceived strengths of the integrated training program included broadening of expertise, a better preparation of future imaging specialists for hybrid imaging, increased efficiency in training residents, and increased efficiency in multidisciplinary meetings. Perceived weaknesses of the integrated training program included reduced exposure to nuclear medicine, less time for research and innovation, and concerns about its international recognition. CONCLUSION: This study provided insights into the experiences of nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists with the Dutch integrated nuclear medicine and radiology residency program, which may be helpful to improve the program and similar residency programs in other countries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-022-05699-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9250465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92504652022-07-04 The integrated nuclear medicine and radiology residency program in the Netherlands: strengths and potential areas for improvement according to nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists Velleman, Ton Kwee, Thomas C. Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O. Ongena, Yfke P. Noordzij, Walter Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the Dutch integrated nuclear medicine and radiology residency program from the perspective of nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists. METHODS: A survey was distributed among nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists in hospitals that participate in the Dutch integrated nuclear medicine and radiology training program. RESULTS: A total of 139 completed questionnaires were included. Nuclear medicine physicians (n = 36) assigned a mean score of 5.7 ± 2.0, and radiologists (n = 103) assigned a mean score of 6.5 ± 2.8 (on a 1–10 scale) to the success of the integrated training program in their hospital. On multiple regression, female gender of the survey participant (B = 2.22, P = 0.034), musculoskeletal radiology as subspecialty of the survey participant (B = 3.36, P = 0.032), and the survey participant’s expectancy of resident’s ability to handle workload after completion of residency were significantly associated with perceived success of the integrated training program (B = 1.16, P = 0.023). Perceived strengths of the integrated training program included broadening of expertise, a better preparation of future imaging specialists for hybrid imaging, increased efficiency in training residents, and increased efficiency in multidisciplinary meetings. Perceived weaknesses of the integrated training program included reduced exposure to nuclear medicine, less time for research and innovation, and concerns about its international recognition. CONCLUSION: This study provided insights into the experiences of nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists with the Dutch integrated nuclear medicine and radiology residency program, which may be helpful to improve the program and similar residency programs in other countries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-022-05699-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9250465/ /pubmed/35194672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05699-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Velleman, Ton
Kwee, Thomas C.
Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O.
Ongena, Yfke P.
Noordzij, Walter
The integrated nuclear medicine and radiology residency program in the Netherlands: strengths and potential areas for improvement according to nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists
title The integrated nuclear medicine and radiology residency program in the Netherlands: strengths and potential areas for improvement according to nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists
title_full The integrated nuclear medicine and radiology residency program in the Netherlands: strengths and potential areas for improvement according to nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists
title_fullStr The integrated nuclear medicine and radiology residency program in the Netherlands: strengths and potential areas for improvement according to nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists
title_full_unstemmed The integrated nuclear medicine and radiology residency program in the Netherlands: strengths and potential areas for improvement according to nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists
title_short The integrated nuclear medicine and radiology residency program in the Netherlands: strengths and potential areas for improvement according to nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists
title_sort integrated nuclear medicine and radiology residency program in the netherlands: strengths and potential areas for improvement according to nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05699-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vellemanton theintegratednuclearmedicineandradiologyresidencyprograminthenetherlandsstrengthsandpotentialareasforimprovementaccordingtonuclearmedicinephysiciansandradiologists
AT kweethomasc theintegratednuclearmedicineandradiologyresidencyprograminthenetherlandsstrengthsandpotentialareasforimprovementaccordingtonuclearmedicinephysiciansandradiologists
AT dierckxrudiajo theintegratednuclearmedicineandradiologyresidencyprograminthenetherlandsstrengthsandpotentialareasforimprovementaccordingtonuclearmedicinephysiciansandradiologists
AT ongenayfkep theintegratednuclearmedicineandradiologyresidencyprograminthenetherlandsstrengthsandpotentialareasforimprovementaccordingtonuclearmedicinephysiciansandradiologists
AT noordzijwalter theintegratednuclearmedicineandradiologyresidencyprograminthenetherlandsstrengthsandpotentialareasforimprovementaccordingtonuclearmedicinephysiciansandradiologists
AT vellemanton integratednuclearmedicineandradiologyresidencyprograminthenetherlandsstrengthsandpotentialareasforimprovementaccordingtonuclearmedicinephysiciansandradiologists
AT kweethomasc integratednuclearmedicineandradiologyresidencyprograminthenetherlandsstrengthsandpotentialareasforimprovementaccordingtonuclearmedicinephysiciansandradiologists
AT dierckxrudiajo integratednuclearmedicineandradiologyresidencyprograminthenetherlandsstrengthsandpotentialareasforimprovementaccordingtonuclearmedicinephysiciansandradiologists
AT ongenayfkep integratednuclearmedicineandradiologyresidencyprograminthenetherlandsstrengthsandpotentialareasforimprovementaccordingtonuclearmedicinephysiciansandradiologists
AT noordzijwalter integratednuclearmedicineandradiologyresidencyprograminthenetherlandsstrengthsandpotentialareasforimprovementaccordingtonuclearmedicinephysiciansandradiologists