Cargando…

Coping with COVID-19: Testing the stress sensitization hypothesis among adults with and without a history of adverse childhood experiences

BACKGROUND: Substantial research suggests that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) disrupt neurobiology, impacting regulatory processes (i.e., emotion regulation) that may sensitize individuals to psychopathology in response to later life stressors. Given the known increase in mental health distres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russo, Jenna E., Dhruve, Deepali M., Oliveros, Arazais D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100379
_version_ 1784739857962106880
author Russo, Jenna E.
Dhruve, Deepali M.
Oliveros, Arazais D.
author_facet Russo, Jenna E.
Dhruve, Deepali M.
Oliveros, Arazais D.
author_sort Russo, Jenna E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Substantial research suggests that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) disrupt neurobiology, impacting regulatory processes (i.e., emotion regulation) that may sensitize individuals to psychopathology in response to later life stressors. Given the known increase in mental health distress related to the current ongoing global pandemic, this study investigated the extent to which COVID-related stress moderates the association between emotion regulation difficulties and psychological symptom ratings among individuals with and without exposure to ACEs. METHODS: Participants (N = 315, aged 18-48) provided self-ratings of ACEs, emotion regulation difficulties, COVID-related stress, and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD. The interaction between emotion regulation difficulties and COVID-related stress on psychological symptoms was examined using path analysis. Multigroup analysis was used to examine the moderating effects of ACEs. RESULTS: For individuals with ACEs, COVID-stress was associated positively with depression and anxiety symptoms when emotion regulation difficulties were low. Higher emotion regulation difficulties were associated with higher symptom ratings and COVID-related stress did not add a significant effect. Goal-setting difficulties, a subscale of emotion regulation difficulties, accounted for the most variance in these associations. LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional design precludes determining causality, retrospective reports may be subject to recall bias, and participant demographics may limit generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides support for stress sensitization theory and highlights the protective role of emotion regulation in enduring moderate stressors. Significant stressors (e.g., COVID-19), however, may warrant additional skills and supports to mitigate internalizing symptoms, particularly for individuals with a history of ACEs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9250707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92507072022-07-05 Coping with COVID-19: Testing the stress sensitization hypothesis among adults with and without a history of adverse childhood experiences Russo, Jenna E. Dhruve, Deepali M. Oliveros, Arazais D. J Affect Disord Rep Brief Report BACKGROUND: Substantial research suggests that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) disrupt neurobiology, impacting regulatory processes (i.e., emotion regulation) that may sensitize individuals to psychopathology in response to later life stressors. Given the known increase in mental health distress related to the current ongoing global pandemic, this study investigated the extent to which COVID-related stress moderates the association between emotion regulation difficulties and psychological symptom ratings among individuals with and without exposure to ACEs. METHODS: Participants (N = 315, aged 18-48) provided self-ratings of ACEs, emotion regulation difficulties, COVID-related stress, and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD. The interaction between emotion regulation difficulties and COVID-related stress on psychological symptoms was examined using path analysis. Multigroup analysis was used to examine the moderating effects of ACEs. RESULTS: For individuals with ACEs, COVID-stress was associated positively with depression and anxiety symptoms when emotion regulation difficulties were low. Higher emotion regulation difficulties were associated with higher symptom ratings and COVID-related stress did not add a significant effect. Goal-setting difficulties, a subscale of emotion regulation difficulties, accounted for the most variance in these associations. LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional design precludes determining causality, retrospective reports may be subject to recall bias, and participant demographics may limit generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides support for stress sensitization theory and highlights the protective role of emotion regulation in enduring moderate stressors. Significant stressors (e.g., COVID-19), however, may warrant additional skills and supports to mitigate internalizing symptoms, particularly for individuals with a history of ACEs. The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022-12 2022-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9250707/ /pubmed/35814811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100379 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Russo, Jenna E.
Dhruve, Deepali M.
Oliveros, Arazais D.
Coping with COVID-19: Testing the stress sensitization hypothesis among adults with and without a history of adverse childhood experiences
title Coping with COVID-19: Testing the stress sensitization hypothesis among adults with and without a history of adverse childhood experiences
title_full Coping with COVID-19: Testing the stress sensitization hypothesis among adults with and without a history of adverse childhood experiences
title_fullStr Coping with COVID-19: Testing the stress sensitization hypothesis among adults with and without a history of adverse childhood experiences
title_full_unstemmed Coping with COVID-19: Testing the stress sensitization hypothesis among adults with and without a history of adverse childhood experiences
title_short Coping with COVID-19: Testing the stress sensitization hypothesis among adults with and without a history of adverse childhood experiences
title_sort coping with covid-19: testing the stress sensitization hypothesis among adults with and without a history of adverse childhood experiences
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35814811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100379
work_keys_str_mv AT russojennae copingwithcovid19testingthestresssensitizationhypothesisamongadultswithandwithoutahistoryofadversechildhoodexperiences
AT dhruvedeepalim copingwithcovid19testingthestresssensitizationhypothesisamongadultswithandwithoutahistoryofadversechildhoodexperiences
AT oliverosarazaisd copingwithcovid19testingthestresssensitizationhypothesisamongadultswithandwithoutahistoryofadversechildhoodexperiences