Cargando…

Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study

OBJECTIVE: The survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RLNA) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remain controversial because clinical behaviors differ among subtypes. The purpose of the present study was to clarify whether RLNA increases the survival rate of advanced high-grade serous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ikeda, Yoshiki, Yoshihara, Masato, Tamauchi, Satoshi, Yokoi, Akira, Yoshikawa, Nobuhisa, Kajiyama, Hiroaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320889
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e40
_version_ 1784739895937335296
author Ikeda, Yoshiki
Yoshihara, Masato
Tamauchi, Satoshi
Yokoi, Akira
Yoshikawa, Nobuhisa
Kajiyama, Hiroaki
author_facet Ikeda, Yoshiki
Yoshihara, Masato
Tamauchi, Satoshi
Yokoi, Akira
Yoshikawa, Nobuhisa
Kajiyama, Hiroaki
author_sort Ikeda, Yoshiki
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RLNA) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remain controversial because clinical behaviors differ among subtypes. The purpose of the present study was to clarify whether RLNA increases the survival rate of advanced high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 3,227 patients with EOC treated between 1986 and 2017 at 14 institutions. Among them, 335 patients with stage IIB-IV HGSC who underwent optimal cytoreduction (residual tumor of <1 cm) were included. Patients were divided into the RLNA group (n=170) and non-RLNA group (n=165). All pathological slides were assessed based on a central pathological review. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups in the original and weighted cohorts adjusted with the inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: The median observation period was 49.8 (0.5–241.5) months. Overall, 219 (65%) out of 335 patients had recurrence or progression, while 146 (44%) died of the disease. In the original cohort, RLNA was a significant prognostic factor for longer progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR]=0.741; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.558–0.985) and overall survival (OS) (HR=0.652; 95% CI=0.459–0.927). In the weighted cohort in which all variables were well balanced as standardized differences decreased, RLNA was also a significant prognostic factor for more favorable oncologic outcomes (PFS, adjusted HR=0.742; 95% CI=0.613–0.899) and OS, adjusted HR=0.620; 95% CI=0.488–0.787). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that RLNA for stage III-IV HGSC with no residual tumor after primary debulking surgery contributed to better oncologic outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9250859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92508592022-07-06 Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study Ikeda, Yoshiki Yoshihara, Masato Tamauchi, Satoshi Yokoi, Akira Yoshikawa, Nobuhisa Kajiyama, Hiroaki J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: The survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RLNA) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remain controversial because clinical behaviors differ among subtypes. The purpose of the present study was to clarify whether RLNA increases the survival rate of advanced high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 3,227 patients with EOC treated between 1986 and 2017 at 14 institutions. Among them, 335 patients with stage IIB-IV HGSC who underwent optimal cytoreduction (residual tumor of <1 cm) were included. Patients were divided into the RLNA group (n=170) and non-RLNA group (n=165). All pathological slides were assessed based on a central pathological review. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups in the original and weighted cohorts adjusted with the inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: The median observation period was 49.8 (0.5–241.5) months. Overall, 219 (65%) out of 335 patients had recurrence or progression, while 146 (44%) died of the disease. In the original cohort, RLNA was a significant prognostic factor for longer progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR]=0.741; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.558–0.985) and overall survival (OS) (HR=0.652; 95% CI=0.459–0.927). In the weighted cohort in which all variables were well balanced as standardized differences decreased, RLNA was also a significant prognostic factor for more favorable oncologic outcomes (PFS, adjusted HR=0.742; 95% CI=0.613–0.899) and OS, adjusted HR=0.620; 95% CI=0.488–0.787). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that RLNA for stage III-IV HGSC with no residual tumor after primary debulking surgery contributed to better oncologic outcomes. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9250859/ /pubmed/35320889 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e40 Text en Copyright © 2022. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ikeda, Yoshiki
Yoshihara, Masato
Tamauchi, Satoshi
Yokoi, Akira
Yoshikawa, Nobuhisa
Kajiyama, Hiroaki
Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study
title Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study
title_full Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study
title_fullStr Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study
title_short Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study
title_sort survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320889
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e40
work_keys_str_mv AT ikedayoshiki survivalbenefitsofretroperitoneallymphadenectomyforoptimallyresectedadvancedovarianhighgradeserouscarcinomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudy
AT yoshiharamasato survivalbenefitsofretroperitoneallymphadenectomyforoptimallyresectedadvancedovarianhighgradeserouscarcinomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudy
AT tamauchisatoshi survivalbenefitsofretroperitoneallymphadenectomyforoptimallyresectedadvancedovarianhighgradeserouscarcinomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudy
AT yokoiakira survivalbenefitsofretroperitoneallymphadenectomyforoptimallyresectedadvancedovarianhighgradeserouscarcinomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudy
AT yoshikawanobuhisa survivalbenefitsofretroperitoneallymphadenectomyforoptimallyresectedadvancedovarianhighgradeserouscarcinomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudy
AT kajiyamahiroaki survivalbenefitsofretroperitoneallymphadenectomyforoptimallyresectedadvancedovarianhighgradeserouscarcinomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudy