Cargando…
Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study
OBJECTIVE: The survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RLNA) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remain controversial because clinical behaviors differ among subtypes. The purpose of the present study was to clarify whether RLNA increases the survival rate of advanced high-grade serous...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320889 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e40 |
_version_ | 1784739895937335296 |
---|---|
author | Ikeda, Yoshiki Yoshihara, Masato Tamauchi, Satoshi Yokoi, Akira Yoshikawa, Nobuhisa Kajiyama, Hiroaki |
author_facet | Ikeda, Yoshiki Yoshihara, Masato Tamauchi, Satoshi Yokoi, Akira Yoshikawa, Nobuhisa Kajiyama, Hiroaki |
author_sort | Ikeda, Yoshiki |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RLNA) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remain controversial because clinical behaviors differ among subtypes. The purpose of the present study was to clarify whether RLNA increases the survival rate of advanced high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 3,227 patients with EOC treated between 1986 and 2017 at 14 institutions. Among them, 335 patients with stage IIB-IV HGSC who underwent optimal cytoreduction (residual tumor of <1 cm) were included. Patients were divided into the RLNA group (n=170) and non-RLNA group (n=165). All pathological slides were assessed based on a central pathological review. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups in the original and weighted cohorts adjusted with the inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: The median observation period was 49.8 (0.5–241.5) months. Overall, 219 (65%) out of 335 patients had recurrence or progression, while 146 (44%) died of the disease. In the original cohort, RLNA was a significant prognostic factor for longer progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR]=0.741; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.558–0.985) and overall survival (OS) (HR=0.652; 95% CI=0.459–0.927). In the weighted cohort in which all variables were well balanced as standardized differences decreased, RLNA was also a significant prognostic factor for more favorable oncologic outcomes (PFS, adjusted HR=0.742; 95% CI=0.613–0.899) and OS, adjusted HR=0.620; 95% CI=0.488–0.787). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that RLNA for stage III-IV HGSC with no residual tumor after primary debulking surgery contributed to better oncologic outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9250859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92508592022-07-06 Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study Ikeda, Yoshiki Yoshihara, Masato Tamauchi, Satoshi Yokoi, Akira Yoshikawa, Nobuhisa Kajiyama, Hiroaki J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: The survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RLNA) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remain controversial because clinical behaviors differ among subtypes. The purpose of the present study was to clarify whether RLNA increases the survival rate of advanced high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 3,227 patients with EOC treated between 1986 and 2017 at 14 institutions. Among them, 335 patients with stage IIB-IV HGSC who underwent optimal cytoreduction (residual tumor of <1 cm) were included. Patients were divided into the RLNA group (n=170) and non-RLNA group (n=165). All pathological slides were assessed based on a central pathological review. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups in the original and weighted cohorts adjusted with the inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: The median observation period was 49.8 (0.5–241.5) months. Overall, 219 (65%) out of 335 patients had recurrence or progression, while 146 (44%) died of the disease. In the original cohort, RLNA was a significant prognostic factor for longer progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR]=0.741; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.558–0.985) and overall survival (OS) (HR=0.652; 95% CI=0.459–0.927). In the weighted cohort in which all variables were well balanced as standardized differences decreased, RLNA was also a significant prognostic factor for more favorable oncologic outcomes (PFS, adjusted HR=0.742; 95% CI=0.613–0.899) and OS, adjusted HR=0.620; 95% CI=0.488–0.787). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that RLNA for stage III-IV HGSC with no residual tumor after primary debulking surgery contributed to better oncologic outcomes. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9250859/ /pubmed/35320889 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e40 Text en Copyright © 2022. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ikeda, Yoshiki Yoshihara, Masato Tamauchi, Satoshi Yokoi, Akira Yoshikawa, Nobuhisa Kajiyama, Hiroaki Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study |
title | Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study |
title_full | Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study |
title_short | Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study |
title_sort | survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320889 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e40 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ikedayoshiki survivalbenefitsofretroperitoneallymphadenectomyforoptimallyresectedadvancedovarianhighgradeserouscarcinomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudy AT yoshiharamasato survivalbenefitsofretroperitoneallymphadenectomyforoptimallyresectedadvancedovarianhighgradeserouscarcinomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudy AT tamauchisatoshi survivalbenefitsofretroperitoneallymphadenectomyforoptimallyresectedadvancedovarianhighgradeserouscarcinomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudy AT yokoiakira survivalbenefitsofretroperitoneallymphadenectomyforoptimallyresectedadvancedovarianhighgradeserouscarcinomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudy AT yoshikawanobuhisa survivalbenefitsofretroperitoneallymphadenectomyforoptimallyresectedadvancedovarianhighgradeserouscarcinomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudy AT kajiyamahiroaki survivalbenefitsofretroperitoneallymphadenectomyforoptimallyresectedadvancedovarianhighgradeserouscarcinomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudy |