Cargando…

The Impact of Pedagogical Agents' Gender on Academic Learning: A Systematic Review

Virtual learning environments often use virtual characters to facilitate and improve the learning process. These characters, known as pedagogical agents, can take on different roles, such as tutors or companions. Research has highlighted the importance of various characteristics of virtual agents, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armando, Marjorie, Ochs, Magalie, Régner, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35795011
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.862997
_version_ 1784740012925911040
author Armando, Marjorie
Ochs, Magalie
Régner, Isabelle
author_facet Armando, Marjorie
Ochs, Magalie
Régner, Isabelle
author_sort Armando, Marjorie
collection PubMed
description Virtual learning environments often use virtual characters to facilitate and improve the learning process. These characters, known as pedagogical agents, can take on different roles, such as tutors or companions. Research has highlighted the importance of various characteristics of virtual agents, including their voice or non-verbal behaviors. Little attention has been paid to the gender-specific design of pedagogical agents, although gender has an important influence on the educational process. In this article, we perform an extensive review of the literature regarding the impact of the gender of pedagogical agents on academic outcomes. Based on a detailed review of 59 articles, we analyze the influence of pedagogical agents' gender on students' academic self-evaluations and achievements to answer the following questions: (1) Do students perceive virtual agents differently depending on their own gender and the gender of the agent? (2) Does the gender of pedagogical agents influence students' academic performance and self-evaluations? (3) Are there tasks or academic situations to which a male virtual agent is better suited than a female virtual agent, and vice versa, according to empirical evidence? (4) How do a virtual agent's pedagogical roles impact these results? (5) How do a virtual agent's appearance and interactive capacities impact these results? (6) Are androgynous virtual agents a potential solution to combatting gender stereotypes? This review provides important insight to researchers on how to approach gender when designing pedagogical agents in virtual learning environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9251372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92513722022-07-05 The Impact of Pedagogical Agents' Gender on Academic Learning: A Systematic Review Armando, Marjorie Ochs, Magalie Régner, Isabelle Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence Virtual learning environments often use virtual characters to facilitate and improve the learning process. These characters, known as pedagogical agents, can take on different roles, such as tutors or companions. Research has highlighted the importance of various characteristics of virtual agents, including their voice or non-verbal behaviors. Little attention has been paid to the gender-specific design of pedagogical agents, although gender has an important influence on the educational process. In this article, we perform an extensive review of the literature regarding the impact of the gender of pedagogical agents on academic outcomes. Based on a detailed review of 59 articles, we analyze the influence of pedagogical agents' gender on students' academic self-evaluations and achievements to answer the following questions: (1) Do students perceive virtual agents differently depending on their own gender and the gender of the agent? (2) Does the gender of pedagogical agents influence students' academic performance and self-evaluations? (3) Are there tasks or academic situations to which a male virtual agent is better suited than a female virtual agent, and vice versa, according to empirical evidence? (4) How do a virtual agent's pedagogical roles impact these results? (5) How do a virtual agent's appearance and interactive capacities impact these results? (6) Are androgynous virtual agents a potential solution to combatting gender stereotypes? This review provides important insight to researchers on how to approach gender when designing pedagogical agents in virtual learning environments. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9251372/ /pubmed/35795011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.862997 Text en Copyright © 2022 Armando, Ochs and Régner. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Artificial Intelligence
Armando, Marjorie
Ochs, Magalie
Régner, Isabelle
The Impact of Pedagogical Agents' Gender on Academic Learning: A Systematic Review
title The Impact of Pedagogical Agents' Gender on Academic Learning: A Systematic Review
title_full The Impact of Pedagogical Agents' Gender on Academic Learning: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Impact of Pedagogical Agents' Gender on Academic Learning: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Pedagogical Agents' Gender on Academic Learning: A Systematic Review
title_short The Impact of Pedagogical Agents' Gender on Academic Learning: A Systematic Review
title_sort impact of pedagogical agents' gender on academic learning: a systematic review
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35795011
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.862997
work_keys_str_mv AT armandomarjorie theimpactofpedagogicalagentsgenderonacademiclearningasystematicreview
AT ochsmagalie theimpactofpedagogicalagentsgenderonacademiclearningasystematicreview
AT regnerisabelle theimpactofpedagogicalagentsgenderonacademiclearningasystematicreview
AT armandomarjorie impactofpedagogicalagentsgenderonacademiclearningasystematicreview
AT ochsmagalie impactofpedagogicalagentsgenderonacademiclearningasystematicreview
AT regnerisabelle impactofpedagogicalagentsgenderonacademiclearningasystematicreview