Cargando…
The Prognostic Value of Gastric Immune Prognostic Index in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the gastric immune prognostic index (GIPI) in gastric cancer patients treated with programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors. Methods: This study was conducted to elucidate the role of GIPI using the data f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35795575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.833584 |
_version_ | 1784740020945420288 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Li Zhao, Ruihu Sun, Hao Huang, Rong Pan, Hongming Zuo, Yanjiao Zhang, Lele Xue, Yingwei Li, Xingrui Song, Hongjiang |
author_facet | Chen, Li Zhao, Ruihu Sun, Hao Huang, Rong Pan, Hongming Zuo, Yanjiao Zhang, Lele Xue, Yingwei Li, Xingrui Song, Hongjiang |
author_sort | Chen, Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the gastric immune prognostic index (GIPI) in gastric cancer patients treated with programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors. Methods: This study was conducted to elucidate the role of GIPI using the data from 146 gastric cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between August 2016 and December 2020 in Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. The GIPI calculation was based on dNLR and LDH. Patients were categorized into three groups: 1) GIPI good (LDH ≤250 U/L and dNLR ≤3); 2) GIPI intermediate (LDH >250 U/L and NLR >3); 3) GIPI poor (LDH >250 U/L and dNLR >3). The correlations between GIPI and clinicopathologic characteristics were determined by the Chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test. The Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to calculate and compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to detect prognostic and predictive factors of PFS and OS. Results: 146 patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were included in this study, of which, 72.6% were GIPI good, 23.3% were GIPI intermediate, and 4.1% were GIPI poor. The GIPI was associated with the common blood parameters, including neutrophils and lymphocytes. The multivariate analysis showed that platelet, TNM stage, and treatment were the independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Patients with GIPI intermediate/poor were associated with shorter PFS (median: 24.63 vs. 32.50 months; p = 0.078) and OS (median: 28.37 months vs. not reached; p = 0.033) than those with GIPI good. GIPI intermediate/poor was correlated with shorter PFS and OS than GIPI good, especially in subgroups of patients with ICI treatment and patients with PD-1/PD-L1 positive status. Conclusions: The GIPI correlated with poor outcomes for PD-1/PD-L1 expression status and may be useful for identifying gastric cancer patients who are unlikely to benefit from treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9251404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92514042022-07-05 The Prognostic Value of Gastric Immune Prognostic Index in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Chen, Li Zhao, Ruihu Sun, Hao Huang, Rong Pan, Hongming Zuo, Yanjiao Zhang, Lele Xue, Yingwei Li, Xingrui Song, Hongjiang Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Objective: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the gastric immune prognostic index (GIPI) in gastric cancer patients treated with programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors. Methods: This study was conducted to elucidate the role of GIPI using the data from 146 gastric cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between August 2016 and December 2020 in Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. The GIPI calculation was based on dNLR and LDH. Patients were categorized into three groups: 1) GIPI good (LDH ≤250 U/L and dNLR ≤3); 2) GIPI intermediate (LDH >250 U/L and NLR >3); 3) GIPI poor (LDH >250 U/L and dNLR >3). The correlations between GIPI and clinicopathologic characteristics were determined by the Chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test. The Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to calculate and compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to detect prognostic and predictive factors of PFS and OS. Results: 146 patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were included in this study, of which, 72.6% were GIPI good, 23.3% were GIPI intermediate, and 4.1% were GIPI poor. The GIPI was associated with the common blood parameters, including neutrophils and lymphocytes. The multivariate analysis showed that platelet, TNM stage, and treatment were the independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Patients with GIPI intermediate/poor were associated with shorter PFS (median: 24.63 vs. 32.50 months; p = 0.078) and OS (median: 28.37 months vs. not reached; p = 0.033) than those with GIPI good. GIPI intermediate/poor was correlated with shorter PFS and OS than GIPI good, especially in subgroups of patients with ICI treatment and patients with PD-1/PD-L1 positive status. Conclusions: The GIPI correlated with poor outcomes for PD-1/PD-L1 expression status and may be useful for identifying gastric cancer patients who are unlikely to benefit from treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9251404/ /pubmed/35795575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.833584 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen, Zhao, Sun, Huang, Pan, Zuo, Zhang, Xue, Li and Song. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Chen, Li Zhao, Ruihu Sun, Hao Huang, Rong Pan, Hongming Zuo, Yanjiao Zhang, Lele Xue, Yingwei Li, Xingrui Song, Hongjiang The Prognostic Value of Gastric Immune Prognostic Index in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors |
title | The Prognostic Value of Gastric Immune Prognostic Index in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors |
title_full | The Prognostic Value of Gastric Immune Prognostic Index in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors |
title_fullStr | The Prognostic Value of Gastric Immune Prognostic Index in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors |
title_full_unstemmed | The Prognostic Value of Gastric Immune Prognostic Index in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors |
title_short | The Prognostic Value of Gastric Immune Prognostic Index in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors |
title_sort | prognostic value of gastric immune prognostic index in gastric cancer patients treated with pd-1/pd-l1 inhibitors |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35795575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.833584 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenli theprognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT zhaoruihu theprognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT sunhao theprognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT huangrong theprognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT panhongming theprognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT zuoyanjiao theprognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT zhanglele theprognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT xueyingwei theprognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT lixingrui theprognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT songhongjiang theprognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT chenli prognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT zhaoruihu prognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT sunhao prognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT huangrong prognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT panhongming prognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT zuoyanjiao prognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT zhanglele prognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT xueyingwei prognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT lixingrui prognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors AT songhongjiang prognosticvalueofgastricimmuneprognosticindexingastriccancerpatientstreatedwithpd1pdl1inhibitors |