Cargando…
Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to explore and discuss key challenges associated with having stakeholders take part in co-designing a health care intervention to increase mobility in older medical patients admitted to two medical departments at two hospitals in Denmark. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Emerald Publishing Limited
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33960175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-02-2020-0049 |
_version_ | 1784740079833448448 |
---|---|
author | Kirk, Jeanette Bandholm, Thomas Andersen, Ove Husted, Rasmus Skov Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine Nilsen, Per Pedersen, Mette Merete |
author_facet | Kirk, Jeanette Bandholm, Thomas Andersen, Ove Husted, Rasmus Skov Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine Nilsen, Per Pedersen, Mette Merete |
author_sort | Kirk, Jeanette |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to explore and discuss key challenges associated with having stakeholders take part in co-designing a health care intervention to increase mobility in older medical patients admitted to two medical departments at two hospitals in Denmark. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The study used a qualitative design to investigate the challenges of co-designing an intervention in five workshops involving health professionals, patients and relatives. “Challenges” are understood as “situations of being faced with something that needs great mental or physical effort in order to be done successfully and therefore tests a person's ability” (Cambridge Dictionary). Thematic content analysis was conducted with a background in the analytical question: “What key challenges arise in the material in relation to the co-design process?”. FINDINGS: Two key challenges were identified: engagement and facilitation. These consisted of five sub-themes: recruiting patients and relatives, involving physicians, adjusting to a new researcher role, utilizing contextual knowledge and handling ethical dilemmas. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The population of patients and relatives participating in the workshops was small, which likely affected the co-design process. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Researchers who want to use co-design must be prepared for the extra time required and the need for skills concerning engagement, communication, facilitation, negotiation and resolution of conflict. Time is also required for ethical discussions and considerations concerning different types of knowledge creation. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Engaging stakeholders in co-design processes is increasingly encouraged. This study documents the key challenges in such processes and reports practical implications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9251644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92516442022-07-18 Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study Kirk, Jeanette Bandholm, Thomas Andersen, Ove Husted, Rasmus Skov Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine Nilsen, Per Pedersen, Mette Merete J Health Organ Manag Research Paper PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to explore and discuss key challenges associated with having stakeholders take part in co-designing a health care intervention to increase mobility in older medical patients admitted to two medical departments at two hospitals in Denmark. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The study used a qualitative design to investigate the challenges of co-designing an intervention in five workshops involving health professionals, patients and relatives. “Challenges” are understood as “situations of being faced with something that needs great mental or physical effort in order to be done successfully and therefore tests a person's ability” (Cambridge Dictionary). Thematic content analysis was conducted with a background in the analytical question: “What key challenges arise in the material in relation to the co-design process?”. FINDINGS: Two key challenges were identified: engagement and facilitation. These consisted of five sub-themes: recruiting patients and relatives, involving physicians, adjusting to a new researcher role, utilizing contextual knowledge and handling ethical dilemmas. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The population of patients and relatives participating in the workshops was small, which likely affected the co-design process. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Researchers who want to use co-design must be prepared for the extra time required and the need for skills concerning engagement, communication, facilitation, negotiation and resolution of conflict. Time is also required for ethical discussions and considerations concerning different types of knowledge creation. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Engaging stakeholders in co-design processes is increasingly encouraged. This study documents the key challenges in such processes and reports practical implications. Emerald Publishing Limited 2021-04-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC9251644/ /pubmed/33960175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-02-2020-0049 Text en © Jeanette Kirk, Thomas Bandholm, Ove Andersen, Rasmus Skov Husted, Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Per Nilsen and Mette Merete Pedersen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Kirk, Jeanette Bandholm, Thomas Andersen, Ove Husted, Rasmus Skov Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine Nilsen, Per Pedersen, Mette Merete Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study |
title | Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study |
title_full | Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study |
title_short | Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study |
title_sort | challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33960175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-02-2020-0049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirkjeanette challengesincodesigninganinterventiontoincreasemobilityinolderpatientsaqualitativestudy AT bandholmthomas challengesincodesigninganinterventiontoincreasemobilityinolderpatientsaqualitativestudy AT andersenove challengesincodesigninganinterventiontoincreasemobilityinolderpatientsaqualitativestudy AT hustedrasmusskov challengesincodesigninganinterventiontoincreasemobilityinolderpatientsaqualitativestudy AT tjørnhøjthomsentine challengesincodesigninganinterventiontoincreasemobilityinolderpatientsaqualitativestudy AT nilsenper challengesincodesigninganinterventiontoincreasemobilityinolderpatientsaqualitativestudy AT pedersenmettemerete challengesincodesigninganinterventiontoincreasemobilityinolderpatientsaqualitativestudy |