Cargando…

Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to explore and discuss key challenges associated with having stakeholders take part in co-designing a health care intervention to increase mobility in older medical patients admitted to two medical departments at two hospitals in Denmark. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirk, Jeanette, Bandholm, Thomas, Andersen, Ove, Husted, Rasmus Skov, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine, Nilsen, Per, Pedersen, Mette Merete
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Emerald Publishing Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33960175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-02-2020-0049
_version_ 1784740079833448448
author Kirk, Jeanette
Bandholm, Thomas
Andersen, Ove
Husted, Rasmus Skov
Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine
Nilsen, Per
Pedersen, Mette Merete
author_facet Kirk, Jeanette
Bandholm, Thomas
Andersen, Ove
Husted, Rasmus Skov
Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine
Nilsen, Per
Pedersen, Mette Merete
author_sort Kirk, Jeanette
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to explore and discuss key challenges associated with having stakeholders take part in co-designing a health care intervention to increase mobility in older medical patients admitted to two medical departments at two hospitals in Denmark. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The study used a qualitative design to investigate the challenges of co-designing an intervention in five workshops involving health professionals, patients and relatives. “Challenges” are understood as “situations of being faced with something that needs great mental or physical effort in order to be done successfully and therefore tests a person's ability” (Cambridge Dictionary). Thematic content analysis was conducted with a background in the analytical question: “What key challenges arise in the material in relation to the co-design process?”. FINDINGS: Two key challenges were identified: engagement and facilitation. These consisted of five sub-themes: recruiting patients and relatives, involving physicians, adjusting to a new researcher role, utilizing contextual knowledge and handling ethical dilemmas. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The population of patients and relatives participating in the workshops was small, which likely affected the co-design process. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Researchers who want to use co-design must be prepared for the extra time required and the need for skills concerning engagement, communication, facilitation, negotiation and resolution of conflict. Time is also required for ethical discussions and considerations concerning different types of knowledge creation. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Engaging stakeholders in co-design processes is increasingly encouraged. This study documents the key challenges in such processes and reports practical implications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9251644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Emerald Publishing Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92516442022-07-18 Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study Kirk, Jeanette Bandholm, Thomas Andersen, Ove Husted, Rasmus Skov Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine Nilsen, Per Pedersen, Mette Merete J Health Organ Manag Research Paper PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to explore and discuss key challenges associated with having stakeholders take part in co-designing a health care intervention to increase mobility in older medical patients admitted to two medical departments at two hospitals in Denmark. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The study used a qualitative design to investigate the challenges of co-designing an intervention in five workshops involving health professionals, patients and relatives. “Challenges” are understood as “situations of being faced with something that needs great mental or physical effort in order to be done successfully and therefore tests a person's ability” (Cambridge Dictionary). Thematic content analysis was conducted with a background in the analytical question: “What key challenges arise in the material in relation to the co-design process?”. FINDINGS: Two key challenges were identified: engagement and facilitation. These consisted of five sub-themes: recruiting patients and relatives, involving physicians, adjusting to a new researcher role, utilizing contextual knowledge and handling ethical dilemmas. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The population of patients and relatives participating in the workshops was small, which likely affected the co-design process. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Researchers who want to use co-design must be prepared for the extra time required and the need for skills concerning engagement, communication, facilitation, negotiation and resolution of conflict. Time is also required for ethical discussions and considerations concerning different types of knowledge creation. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Engaging stakeholders in co-design processes is increasingly encouraged. This study documents the key challenges in such processes and reports practical implications. Emerald Publishing Limited 2021-04-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC9251644/ /pubmed/33960175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-02-2020-0049 Text en © Jeanette Kirk, Thomas Bandholm, Ove Andersen, Rasmus Skov Husted, Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Per Nilsen and Mette Merete Pedersen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Paper
Kirk, Jeanette
Bandholm, Thomas
Andersen, Ove
Husted, Rasmus Skov
Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine
Nilsen, Per
Pedersen, Mette Merete
Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study
title Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study
title_full Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study
title_short Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study
title_sort challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33960175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-02-2020-0049
work_keys_str_mv AT kirkjeanette challengesincodesigninganinterventiontoincreasemobilityinolderpatientsaqualitativestudy
AT bandholmthomas challengesincodesigninganinterventiontoincreasemobilityinolderpatientsaqualitativestudy
AT andersenove challengesincodesigninganinterventiontoincreasemobilityinolderpatientsaqualitativestudy
AT hustedrasmusskov challengesincodesigninganinterventiontoincreasemobilityinolderpatientsaqualitativestudy
AT tjørnhøjthomsentine challengesincodesigninganinterventiontoincreasemobilityinolderpatientsaqualitativestudy
AT nilsenper challengesincodesigninganinterventiontoincreasemobilityinolderpatientsaqualitativestudy
AT pedersenmettemerete challengesincodesigninganinterventiontoincreasemobilityinolderpatientsaqualitativestudy