Cargando…
Combining individual patient data from randomized and non-randomized studies to predict real-world effectiveness of interventions
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials is generally considered the most reliable source of estimates of relative treatment effects. However, in the last few years, there has been interest in using non-randomized studies to complement evidence from randomized controlled trials. Several meta-an...
Autores principales: | Seo, Michael, Debray, Thomas PA, Ruffieux, Yann, Gsteiger, Sandro, Bujkiewicz, Sylwia, Finckh, Axel, Egger, Matthias, Efthimiou, Orestis |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35469504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09622802221090759 |
Ejemplares similares
-
GetReal in mathematical modelling: a review of studies predicting drug effectiveness in the real world
por: Panayidou, Klea, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Bayesian network meta-analysis methods for combining individual participant data and aggregate data from single arm trials and randomised controlled trials
por: Singh, Janharpreet, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The inclusion of real world evidence in clinical development planning
por: Martina, Reynaldo, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology
por: Debray, Thomas P. A., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Using Bayesian Evidence Synthesis Methods to Incorporate Real-World Evidence in Surrogate Endpoint Evaluation
por: Wheaton, Lorna, et al.
Publicado: (2023)