Cargando…

Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Values Using Spectral-Domain and Swept-Source OCT

PURPOSE: To compare peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness measurements obtained with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) using an OCT-angiography scanning protocol, and their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rabiolo, Alessandro, Fantaguzzi, Federico, Montesano, Giovanni, Brambati, Maria, Sacconi, Riccardo, Gelormini, Francesco, Triolo, Giacinto, Bettin, Paolo, Querques, Giuseppe, Bandello, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35767273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.6.27
_version_ 1784740108622102528
author Rabiolo, Alessandro
Fantaguzzi, Federico
Montesano, Giovanni
Brambati, Maria
Sacconi, Riccardo
Gelormini, Francesco
Triolo, Giacinto
Bettin, Paolo
Querques, Giuseppe
Bandello, Francesco
author_facet Rabiolo, Alessandro
Fantaguzzi, Federico
Montesano, Giovanni
Brambati, Maria
Sacconi, Riccardo
Gelormini, Francesco
Triolo, Giacinto
Bettin, Paolo
Querques, Giuseppe
Bandello, Francesco
author_sort Rabiolo, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness measurements obtained with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) using an OCT-angiography scanning protocol, and their ability to distinguish among patients with glaucoma, glaucoma suspects (GS), and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 196 eyes (81 glaucoma, 48 GS, and 67 HC) of 119 participants. Participants underwent peripapillary and macular OCT with SD-OCT and SS-OCT. Parameters of interest were average and sector-wise pRNFL and mGCIPL thickness. Inter-device agreement was investigated with Bland-Altman statistics. Conversion formulas were developed with linear regression. Diagnostic performances were evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Both SD-OCT and SS-OCT detected a significant pRNFL and mGCIPL thinning in glaucoma patients compared to HC and GS for almost all study sectors. A strong linear relationship between the two devices was present for all quadrants/sectors (R(2) ≥ 0.81, P < 0.001), except for the nasal (R(2) = 0.49, P < 0.001) and temporal (R(2) = 0.62, P < 0.001) pRNFL quadrants. SD-OCT and SS-OCT measurements had a proportional bias, which could be removed with conversion formulas. Overall, the two devices showed similar diagnostic abilities. CONCLUSIONS: Thickness values obtained with SD-OCT and SS-OCT are not directly interchangeable but potentially interconvertible. Both devices have a similar ability to discriminate glaucoma patients from GS and healthy subjects. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: OCT-Angiography scans can be reliably used to obtain structural metrics in glaucoma patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9251790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92517902022-07-05 Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Values Using Spectral-Domain and Swept-Source OCT Rabiolo, Alessandro Fantaguzzi, Federico Montesano, Giovanni Brambati, Maria Sacconi, Riccardo Gelormini, Francesco Triolo, Giacinto Bettin, Paolo Querques, Giuseppe Bandello, Francesco Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To compare peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness measurements obtained with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) using an OCT-angiography scanning protocol, and their ability to distinguish among patients with glaucoma, glaucoma suspects (GS), and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 196 eyes (81 glaucoma, 48 GS, and 67 HC) of 119 participants. Participants underwent peripapillary and macular OCT with SD-OCT and SS-OCT. Parameters of interest were average and sector-wise pRNFL and mGCIPL thickness. Inter-device agreement was investigated with Bland-Altman statistics. Conversion formulas were developed with linear regression. Diagnostic performances were evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Both SD-OCT and SS-OCT detected a significant pRNFL and mGCIPL thinning in glaucoma patients compared to HC and GS for almost all study sectors. A strong linear relationship between the two devices was present for all quadrants/sectors (R(2) ≥ 0.81, P < 0.001), except for the nasal (R(2) = 0.49, P < 0.001) and temporal (R(2) = 0.62, P < 0.001) pRNFL quadrants. SD-OCT and SS-OCT measurements had a proportional bias, which could be removed with conversion formulas. Overall, the two devices showed similar diagnostic abilities. CONCLUSIONS: Thickness values obtained with SD-OCT and SS-OCT are not directly interchangeable but potentially interconvertible. Both devices have a similar ability to discriminate glaucoma patients from GS and healthy subjects. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: OCT-Angiography scans can be reliably used to obtain structural metrics in glaucoma patients. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9251790/ /pubmed/35767273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.6.27 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Rabiolo, Alessandro
Fantaguzzi, Federico
Montesano, Giovanni
Brambati, Maria
Sacconi, Riccardo
Gelormini, Francesco
Triolo, Giacinto
Bettin, Paolo
Querques, Giuseppe
Bandello, Francesco
Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Values Using Spectral-Domain and Swept-Source OCT
title Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Values Using Spectral-Domain and Swept-Source OCT
title_full Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Values Using Spectral-Domain and Swept-Source OCT
title_fullStr Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Values Using Spectral-Domain and Swept-Source OCT
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Values Using Spectral-Domain and Swept-Source OCT
title_short Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Values Using Spectral-Domain and Swept-Source OCT
title_sort comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer thickness values using spectral-domain and swept-source oct
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35767273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.6.27
work_keys_str_mv AT rabioloalessandro comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerandganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessvaluesusingspectraldomainandsweptsourceoct
AT fantaguzzifederico comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerandganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessvaluesusingspectraldomainandsweptsourceoct
AT montesanogiovanni comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerandganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessvaluesusingspectraldomainandsweptsourceoct
AT brambatimaria comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerandganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessvaluesusingspectraldomainandsweptsourceoct
AT sacconiriccardo comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerandganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessvaluesusingspectraldomainandsweptsourceoct
AT gelorminifrancesco comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerandganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessvaluesusingspectraldomainandsweptsourceoct
AT triologiacinto comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerandganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessvaluesusingspectraldomainandsweptsourceoct
AT bettinpaolo comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerandganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessvaluesusingspectraldomainandsweptsourceoct
AT querquesgiuseppe comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerandganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessvaluesusingspectraldomainandsweptsourceoct
AT bandellofrancesco comparisonofretinalnervefiberlayerandganglioncellinnerplexiformlayerthicknessvaluesusingspectraldomainandsweptsourceoct