Cargando…

Validating a Semi-Automated Technique for Segmenting Femoral Articular Cartilage on Ultrasound Images

OBJECTIVE: To validate a semi-automated technique to segment ultrasound-assessed femoral cartilage without compromising segmentation accuracy to a traditional manual segmentation technique in participants with an anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL). DESIGN: We recruited 27 participants with a pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harkey, Matthew S., Michel, Nicholas, Kuenze, Christopher, Fajardo, Ryan, Salzler, Matt, Driban, Jeffrey B., Hacihaliloglu, Ilker
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35438030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19476035221093069
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To validate a semi-automated technique to segment ultrasound-assessed femoral cartilage without compromising segmentation accuracy to a traditional manual segmentation technique in participants with an anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL). DESIGN: We recruited 27 participants with a primary unilateral ACL injury at a pre-operative clinic visit. One investigator performed a transverse suprapatellar ultrasound scan with the participant’s ACL injured knee in maximum flexion. Three femoral cartilage ultrasound images were recorded. A single expert reader manually segmented the femoral cartilage cross-sectional area in each image. In addition, we created a semi-automatic program to segment the cartilage using a random walker-based method. We quantified the average cartilage thickness and echo-intensity for the manual and semi-automated segmentations. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(2,k)) and Bland-Altman plots were used to validate the semi-automated technique to the manual segmentation for assessing average cartilage thickness and echo-intensity. A dice correlation coefficient was used to quantify the overlap between the segmentations created with the semi-automated and manual techniques. RESULTS: For average cartilage thickness, there was excellent reliability (ICC(2,k) = 0.99) and a small mean difference (+0.8%) between the manual and semi-automated segmentations. For average echo-intensity, there was excellent reliability (ICC(2,k) = 0.97) and a small mean difference (−2.5%) between the manual and semi-automated segmentations. The average dice correlation coefficient between the manual segmentation and semi-automated segmentation was 0.90, indicating high overlap between techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel semi-automated segmentation technique is a valid method that requires less technical expertise and time than manual segmentation in patients after ACL injury.