Cargando…

Abiotic and biotic responses to woody debris additions in restored old fields in a multi‐site Before‐After‐Control‐Impact experiment

Ecological restoration of former agricultural land can improve soil conditions, recover native vegetation, and provide fauna habitat. However, restoration benefits are often associated with time lags, as many attributes, such as leaf litter and coarse woody debris, need time to accumulate. Here, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parkhurst, Tina, Prober, Suzanne M., Farrell, Mark, Standish, Rachel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35813918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9058
_version_ 1784740119216914432
author Parkhurst, Tina
Prober, Suzanne M.
Farrell, Mark
Standish, Rachel J.
author_facet Parkhurst, Tina
Prober, Suzanne M.
Farrell, Mark
Standish, Rachel J.
author_sort Parkhurst, Tina
collection PubMed
description Ecological restoration of former agricultural land can improve soil conditions, recover native vegetation, and provide fauna habitat. However, restoration benefits are often associated with time lags, as many attributes, such as leaf litter and coarse woody debris, need time to accumulate. Here, we experimentally tested whether adding mulch and logs to restoration sites in semi‐arid Western Australia can accelerate restoration benefits. All sites had been cropped and then planted with native trees and shrubs (i.e., Eucalyptus, Melaleuca, and Acacia spp.) 10 years prior to our experiment, to re‐establish the original temperate eucalypt woodland vegetation community. We used a Multi‐site Before‐After‐Control‐Impact (MBACI) design to test the effects on 30 abiotic and biotic response variables over a period of 2 years. Of the 30 response variables, a significant effect was found for just four variables: volumetric water content, decomposition, native herbaceous species cover and species richness of disturbance specialist ants. Mulch addition had a positive effect on soil moisture when compared to controls but suppressed growth of native (but not exotic) herbaceous plants. On plots with log additions, decomposition rates decreased, and species richness of disturbance specialist ants increased. However, we found no effect on total species richness and abundance of other ant species groups. The benefit of mulch to soil moisture was offset by its disbenefit to native herbs in our study. Given time, logs may also provide habitat for ant species that prefer concealed habitats. Indeed, benefits to other soil biophysical properties, vegetation, and ant fauna may require longer time frames to be detected. Further research is needed to determine whether the type, quantity, and context of mulch and log additions may improve their utility for old field restoration and whether effects on native herbs are correlated with idiosyncratic climatic conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9251846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92518462022-07-08 Abiotic and biotic responses to woody debris additions in restored old fields in a multi‐site Before‐After‐Control‐Impact experiment Parkhurst, Tina Prober, Suzanne M. Farrell, Mark Standish, Rachel J. Ecol Evol Research Articles Ecological restoration of former agricultural land can improve soil conditions, recover native vegetation, and provide fauna habitat. However, restoration benefits are often associated with time lags, as many attributes, such as leaf litter and coarse woody debris, need time to accumulate. Here, we experimentally tested whether adding mulch and logs to restoration sites in semi‐arid Western Australia can accelerate restoration benefits. All sites had been cropped and then planted with native trees and shrubs (i.e., Eucalyptus, Melaleuca, and Acacia spp.) 10 years prior to our experiment, to re‐establish the original temperate eucalypt woodland vegetation community. We used a Multi‐site Before‐After‐Control‐Impact (MBACI) design to test the effects on 30 abiotic and biotic response variables over a period of 2 years. Of the 30 response variables, a significant effect was found for just four variables: volumetric water content, decomposition, native herbaceous species cover and species richness of disturbance specialist ants. Mulch addition had a positive effect on soil moisture when compared to controls but suppressed growth of native (but not exotic) herbaceous plants. On plots with log additions, decomposition rates decreased, and species richness of disturbance specialist ants increased. However, we found no effect on total species richness and abundance of other ant species groups. The benefit of mulch to soil moisture was offset by its disbenefit to native herbs in our study. Given time, logs may also provide habitat for ant species that prefer concealed habitats. Indeed, benefits to other soil biophysical properties, vegetation, and ant fauna may require longer time frames to be detected. Further research is needed to determine whether the type, quantity, and context of mulch and log additions may improve their utility for old field restoration and whether effects on native herbs are correlated with idiosyncratic climatic conditions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9251846/ /pubmed/35813918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9058 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Parkhurst, Tina
Prober, Suzanne M.
Farrell, Mark
Standish, Rachel J.
Abiotic and biotic responses to woody debris additions in restored old fields in a multi‐site Before‐After‐Control‐Impact experiment
title Abiotic and biotic responses to woody debris additions in restored old fields in a multi‐site Before‐After‐Control‐Impact experiment
title_full Abiotic and biotic responses to woody debris additions in restored old fields in a multi‐site Before‐After‐Control‐Impact experiment
title_fullStr Abiotic and biotic responses to woody debris additions in restored old fields in a multi‐site Before‐After‐Control‐Impact experiment
title_full_unstemmed Abiotic and biotic responses to woody debris additions in restored old fields in a multi‐site Before‐After‐Control‐Impact experiment
title_short Abiotic and biotic responses to woody debris additions in restored old fields in a multi‐site Before‐After‐Control‐Impact experiment
title_sort abiotic and biotic responses to woody debris additions in restored old fields in a multi‐site before‐after‐control‐impact experiment
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35813918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9058
work_keys_str_mv AT parkhursttina abioticandbioticresponsestowoodydebrisadditionsinrestoredoldfieldsinamultisitebeforeaftercontrolimpactexperiment
AT probersuzannem abioticandbioticresponsestowoodydebrisadditionsinrestoredoldfieldsinamultisitebeforeaftercontrolimpactexperiment
AT farrellmark abioticandbioticresponsestowoodydebrisadditionsinrestoredoldfieldsinamultisitebeforeaftercontrolimpactexperiment
AT standishrachelj abioticandbioticresponsestowoodydebrisadditionsinrestoredoldfieldsinamultisitebeforeaftercontrolimpactexperiment