Cargando…

Design and validation of a new scale for prehospital evaluation of stroke and large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND: Rapid recognition of acute stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) is essential in prehospital triage for timely reperfusion treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate a new screening tool for both stroke and LVO in an urban Chinese population. METHODS: This study inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shao, Yanqi, Zhang, Zheyu, Jin, Bo, Xu, Jingsi, Peng, Deqing, Geng, Yu, Zhang, Jungen, Zhang, Sheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35795134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864221104511
_version_ 1784740149837430784
author Shao, Yanqi
Zhang, Zheyu
Jin, Bo
Xu, Jingsi
Peng, Deqing
Geng, Yu
Zhang, Jungen
Zhang, Sheng
author_facet Shao, Yanqi
Zhang, Zheyu
Jin, Bo
Xu, Jingsi
Peng, Deqing
Geng, Yu
Zhang, Jungen
Zhang, Sheng
author_sort Shao, Yanqi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rapid recognition of acute stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) is essential in prehospital triage for timely reperfusion treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate a new screening tool for both stroke and LVO in an urban Chinese population. METHODS: This study included patients with suspected stroke who were transferred to our hospital by emergency medical services between July 2017 and June 2021. The population was randomly partitioned into training (70%) and validation (30%) groups. The Staring-Hypertension-atrIal fibrillation-sPeech-weakneSs (SHIPS) scale, consisting of both clinical and medical history information, was generated based on multivariate logistic models. The predictive ability of the SHIPS scale was evaluated and compared with other scales using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve comparison analysis. RESULTS: A total of 400 patients were included in this analysis. In the training group (n = 280), the SHIPS scale showed a sensitivity of 90.4% and specificity of 60.8% in predicting stroke and a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 61.5% in predicting LVO. In the validation group (n = 120), the SHIPS scale was not inferior to Stroke 1-2-0 (p = 0.301) in predicting stroke and was significantly better than the Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool (C-STAT; formerly CPSSS) and the Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity scale (PASS) (all p < 0.05) in predicting LVO. In addition, including medical history in the scale was significantly better than using symptoms alone in detecting stroke (training group, 0.853 versus 0.818; validation group, 0.814 versus 0.764) and LVO (training group, 0.748 versus 0.722; validation group, 0.825 versus 0.778). CONCLUSION: The SHIPS scale may serve as a superior screening tool for stroke and LVO identification in prehospital triage. Including medical history in the SHIPS scale improves the predictive value compared with clinical symptoms alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9251951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92519512022-07-05 Design and validation of a new scale for prehospital evaluation of stroke and large vessel occlusion Shao, Yanqi Zhang, Zheyu Jin, Bo Xu, Jingsi Peng, Deqing Geng, Yu Zhang, Jungen Zhang, Sheng Ther Adv Neurol Disord Original Research BACKGROUND: Rapid recognition of acute stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) is essential in prehospital triage for timely reperfusion treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate a new screening tool for both stroke and LVO in an urban Chinese population. METHODS: This study included patients with suspected stroke who were transferred to our hospital by emergency medical services between July 2017 and June 2021. The population was randomly partitioned into training (70%) and validation (30%) groups. The Staring-Hypertension-atrIal fibrillation-sPeech-weakneSs (SHIPS) scale, consisting of both clinical and medical history information, was generated based on multivariate logistic models. The predictive ability of the SHIPS scale was evaluated and compared with other scales using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve comparison analysis. RESULTS: A total of 400 patients were included in this analysis. In the training group (n = 280), the SHIPS scale showed a sensitivity of 90.4% and specificity of 60.8% in predicting stroke and a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 61.5% in predicting LVO. In the validation group (n = 120), the SHIPS scale was not inferior to Stroke 1-2-0 (p = 0.301) in predicting stroke and was significantly better than the Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool (C-STAT; formerly CPSSS) and the Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity scale (PASS) (all p < 0.05) in predicting LVO. In addition, including medical history in the scale was significantly better than using symptoms alone in detecting stroke (training group, 0.853 versus 0.818; validation group, 0.814 versus 0.764) and LVO (training group, 0.748 versus 0.722; validation group, 0.825 versus 0.778). CONCLUSION: The SHIPS scale may serve as a superior screening tool for stroke and LVO identification in prehospital triage. Including medical history in the SHIPS scale improves the predictive value compared with clinical symptoms alone. SAGE Publications 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9251951/ /pubmed/35795134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864221104511 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Shao, Yanqi
Zhang, Zheyu
Jin, Bo
Xu, Jingsi
Peng, Deqing
Geng, Yu
Zhang, Jungen
Zhang, Sheng
Design and validation of a new scale for prehospital evaluation of stroke and large vessel occlusion
title Design and validation of a new scale for prehospital evaluation of stroke and large vessel occlusion
title_full Design and validation of a new scale for prehospital evaluation of stroke and large vessel occlusion
title_fullStr Design and validation of a new scale for prehospital evaluation of stroke and large vessel occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Design and validation of a new scale for prehospital evaluation of stroke and large vessel occlusion
title_short Design and validation of a new scale for prehospital evaluation of stroke and large vessel occlusion
title_sort design and validation of a new scale for prehospital evaluation of stroke and large vessel occlusion
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35795134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864221104511
work_keys_str_mv AT shaoyanqi designandvalidationofanewscaleforprehospitalevaluationofstrokeandlargevesselocclusion
AT zhangzheyu designandvalidationofanewscaleforprehospitalevaluationofstrokeandlargevesselocclusion
AT jinbo designandvalidationofanewscaleforprehospitalevaluationofstrokeandlargevesselocclusion
AT xujingsi designandvalidationofanewscaleforprehospitalevaluationofstrokeandlargevesselocclusion
AT pengdeqing designandvalidationofanewscaleforprehospitalevaluationofstrokeandlargevesselocclusion
AT gengyu designandvalidationofanewscaleforprehospitalevaluationofstrokeandlargevesselocclusion
AT zhangjungen designandvalidationofanewscaleforprehospitalevaluationofstrokeandlargevesselocclusion
AT zhangsheng designandvalidationofanewscaleforprehospitalevaluationofstrokeandlargevesselocclusion