Cargando…

Heterotopic ossification after alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: a case cohort study

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is one of the serious complications leading to the failure of alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement (TJR). However, there was few research on its exact incidence and occurrence. Severe HO might result in pain and limited mouth opening after surgery...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Ruoyi, Lu, Chuan, Zhao, Jieyun, He, Dongmei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9252052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35787680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05582-5
_version_ 1784740177820778496
author Ding, Ruoyi
Lu, Chuan
Zhao, Jieyun
He, Dongmei
author_facet Ding, Ruoyi
Lu, Chuan
Zhao, Jieyun
He, Dongmei
author_sort Ding, Ruoyi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is one of the serious complications leading to the failure of alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement (TJR). However, there was few research on its exact incidence and occurrence. Severe HO might result in pain and limited mouth opening after surgery. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify its clinical and imaging manifestations. The purpose of this study was to study the occurrence and classify HO after the alloplastic TJR. METHOD: Patients who underwent standard TJR (Zimmer Biomet stock prostheses or Chinese stock prostheses) with fat graft and at least 1-year-follow-up were included. HO was classified into 4 types according to postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Type and occurrence in different TMJ disease were compared. Joint space within 1 week after operation was measured and compared between HO and non-HO TJRs. Maximum incisal opening (MIO), pain, and quality of life (QoL) were recorded and their relevance with HO was analyzed statistically. RESULT: 81cases with 101 joints were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 22.9 months (12 ~ 56 months). Among the 48 joints, 27 (56.3%) were type I (bone islands); 16 (33.3%) were type II (bone spurs from the mandibular ramus); 3 (6.3%) were type III (bone spurs from the fossa); and 2 (4.2%) were type IV (bone spurs from both the mandibular ramus and fossa). In HO patients, joint space in type IV was smaller than the other 3 types. Pain scores in HO were significantly greater than non-HO patients before and after operations (p < 0.05). 1 patient in Type IV HO developed ankylosis and had prosthesis revision which accounted for 2.1% in HO patients and 1.0% in all TJR patients. CONCLUSION: HO after alloplastic TJR with fat graft was not severe except for type IV, which was easy to cause ankylosis. Preserving sufficient TJR space was important for ankylosis prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9252052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92520522022-07-05 Heterotopic ossification after alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: a case cohort study Ding, Ruoyi Lu, Chuan Zhao, Jieyun He, Dongmei BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is one of the serious complications leading to the failure of alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement (TJR). However, there was few research on its exact incidence and occurrence. Severe HO might result in pain and limited mouth opening after surgery. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify its clinical and imaging manifestations. The purpose of this study was to study the occurrence and classify HO after the alloplastic TJR. METHOD: Patients who underwent standard TJR (Zimmer Biomet stock prostheses or Chinese stock prostheses) with fat graft and at least 1-year-follow-up were included. HO was classified into 4 types according to postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Type and occurrence in different TMJ disease were compared. Joint space within 1 week after operation was measured and compared between HO and non-HO TJRs. Maximum incisal opening (MIO), pain, and quality of life (QoL) were recorded and their relevance with HO was analyzed statistically. RESULT: 81cases with 101 joints were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 22.9 months (12 ~ 56 months). Among the 48 joints, 27 (56.3%) were type I (bone islands); 16 (33.3%) were type II (bone spurs from the mandibular ramus); 3 (6.3%) were type III (bone spurs from the fossa); and 2 (4.2%) were type IV (bone spurs from both the mandibular ramus and fossa). In HO patients, joint space in type IV was smaller than the other 3 types. Pain scores in HO were significantly greater than non-HO patients before and after operations (p < 0.05). 1 patient in Type IV HO developed ankylosis and had prosthesis revision which accounted for 2.1% in HO patients and 1.0% in all TJR patients. CONCLUSION: HO after alloplastic TJR with fat graft was not severe except for type IV, which was easy to cause ankylosis. Preserving sufficient TJR space was important for ankylosis prevention. BioMed Central 2022-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9252052/ /pubmed/35787680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05582-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ding, Ruoyi
Lu, Chuan
Zhao, Jieyun
He, Dongmei
Heterotopic ossification after alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: a case cohort study
title Heterotopic ossification after alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: a case cohort study
title_full Heterotopic ossification after alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: a case cohort study
title_fullStr Heterotopic ossification after alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: a case cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Heterotopic ossification after alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: a case cohort study
title_short Heterotopic ossification after alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: a case cohort study
title_sort heterotopic ossification after alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: a case cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9252052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35787680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05582-5
work_keys_str_mv AT dingruoyi heterotopicossificationafteralloplastictemporomandibularjointreplacementacasecohortstudy
AT luchuan heterotopicossificationafteralloplastictemporomandibularjointreplacementacasecohortstudy
AT zhaojieyun heterotopicossificationafteralloplastictemporomandibularjointreplacementacasecohortstudy
AT hedongmei heterotopicossificationafteralloplastictemporomandibularjointreplacementacasecohortstudy