Cargando…

Prognostic value of the ratio of maximum to minimum diameter of primary tumor in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Several models and markers were developed and found to predict outcome of advanced renal cell carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the ratio of maximum to minimum tumor diameter (ROD) in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). METHODS: Patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Hongzhe, Cao, Chuanzhen, Wen, Li, Zhang, Lianyu, Zhang, Jin, Ma, Jianhui, Shou, Jianzhong, Li, Changling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9252060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35787269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01047-y
_version_ 1784740179593920512
author Shi, Hongzhe
Cao, Chuanzhen
Wen, Li
Zhang, Lianyu
Zhang, Jin
Ma, Jianhui
Shou, Jianzhong
Li, Changling
author_facet Shi, Hongzhe
Cao, Chuanzhen
Wen, Li
Zhang, Lianyu
Zhang, Jin
Ma, Jianhui
Shou, Jianzhong
Li, Changling
author_sort Shi, Hongzhe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several models and markers were developed and found to predict outcome of advanced renal cell carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the ratio of maximum to minimum tumor diameter (ROD) in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). METHODS: Patients with mccRCC (n = 213) treated with sunitinib from January 2008 to December 2018 were identified. Cutoff value for ROD was determined using receiver operating characteristic. Patients with different ROD scores were grouped and evaluated. Survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS: The optimal ROD cutoff value of 1.34 was determined for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients in ROD ≥ 1.34 group had shorter PFS (9.6 versus 17.7 months, p < 0.001) and OS (25.5 versus 32.6 months, p < 0.001) than patients in ROD < 1.34 group. After adjustment for other factors, multivariate analysis showed ROD ≥ 1.34 was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.006). Patients in ROD ≥ 1.34 group presented higher proportions of pT3/4 stage (89.2% versus 10.8%, p = 0.021), WHO/ISUP grade III/IV (72.0% versus 28.0%, p = 0.010), tumor necrosis (71.0% versus 29.0%, p = 0.039), sarcomatoid differentiation (79.1% versus 20.9%, p = 0.007), poor MSKCC risk score (78.4% versus 21.6%, p < 0.001) and poor IMDC risk score (74.4% versus 25.6%, p < 0.001) than ROD < 1.34 group. CONCLUSION: Primary tumor with higher ROD was an independently prognostic factor for both PFS and OS in patients with mccRCC who received targeted therapy. Higher ROD was also associated with high pT stage, high WHO/ISUP grade, sarcomatoid features, tumor necrosis, poor MSKCC and IMDC risk score. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-022-01047-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9252060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92520602022-07-05 Prognostic value of the ratio of maximum to minimum diameter of primary tumor in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma Shi, Hongzhe Cao, Chuanzhen Wen, Li Zhang, Lianyu Zhang, Jin Ma, Jianhui Shou, Jianzhong Li, Changling BMC Urol Research BACKGROUND: Several models and markers were developed and found to predict outcome of advanced renal cell carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the ratio of maximum to minimum tumor diameter (ROD) in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). METHODS: Patients with mccRCC (n = 213) treated with sunitinib from January 2008 to December 2018 were identified. Cutoff value for ROD was determined using receiver operating characteristic. Patients with different ROD scores were grouped and evaluated. Survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS: The optimal ROD cutoff value of 1.34 was determined for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients in ROD ≥ 1.34 group had shorter PFS (9.6 versus 17.7 months, p < 0.001) and OS (25.5 versus 32.6 months, p < 0.001) than patients in ROD < 1.34 group. After adjustment for other factors, multivariate analysis showed ROD ≥ 1.34 was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.006). Patients in ROD ≥ 1.34 group presented higher proportions of pT3/4 stage (89.2% versus 10.8%, p = 0.021), WHO/ISUP grade III/IV (72.0% versus 28.0%, p = 0.010), tumor necrosis (71.0% versus 29.0%, p = 0.039), sarcomatoid differentiation (79.1% versus 20.9%, p = 0.007), poor MSKCC risk score (78.4% versus 21.6%, p < 0.001) and poor IMDC risk score (74.4% versus 25.6%, p < 0.001) than ROD < 1.34 group. CONCLUSION: Primary tumor with higher ROD was an independently prognostic factor for both PFS and OS in patients with mccRCC who received targeted therapy. Higher ROD was also associated with high pT stage, high WHO/ISUP grade, sarcomatoid features, tumor necrosis, poor MSKCC and IMDC risk score. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-022-01047-y. BioMed Central 2022-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9252060/ /pubmed/35787269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01047-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Shi, Hongzhe
Cao, Chuanzhen
Wen, Li
Zhang, Lianyu
Zhang, Jin
Ma, Jianhui
Shou, Jianzhong
Li, Changling
Prognostic value of the ratio of maximum to minimum diameter of primary tumor in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
title Prognostic value of the ratio of maximum to minimum diameter of primary tumor in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
title_full Prognostic value of the ratio of maximum to minimum diameter of primary tumor in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Prognostic value of the ratio of maximum to minimum diameter of primary tumor in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of the ratio of maximum to minimum diameter of primary tumor in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
title_short Prognostic value of the ratio of maximum to minimum diameter of primary tumor in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
title_sort prognostic value of the ratio of maximum to minimum diameter of primary tumor in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9252060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35787269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01047-y
work_keys_str_mv AT shihongzhe prognosticvalueoftheratioofmaximumtominimumdiameterofprimarytumorinmetastaticclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT caochuanzhen prognosticvalueoftheratioofmaximumtominimumdiameterofprimarytumorinmetastaticclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT wenli prognosticvalueoftheratioofmaximumtominimumdiameterofprimarytumorinmetastaticclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT zhanglianyu prognosticvalueoftheratioofmaximumtominimumdiameterofprimarytumorinmetastaticclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT zhangjin prognosticvalueoftheratioofmaximumtominimumdiameterofprimarytumorinmetastaticclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT majianhui prognosticvalueoftheratioofmaximumtominimumdiameterofprimarytumorinmetastaticclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT shoujianzhong prognosticvalueoftheratioofmaximumtominimumdiameterofprimarytumorinmetastaticclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT lichangling prognosticvalueoftheratioofmaximumtominimumdiameterofprimarytumorinmetastaticclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma