Cargando…

A systematic review of newborn health interventions in humanitarian settings

BACKGROUND: Almost half of the under-5 deaths occur in the neonatal period and most can be prevented with quality newborn care. The already vulnerable state of newborns is exacerbated in humanitarian settings. This review aims to assess the current evidence of the interventions being provided in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodo, Mariana, Duclos, Diane, DeJong, Jocelyn, Akik, Chaza, Singh, Neha S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9252185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35777926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009082
_version_ 1784740208825073664
author Rodo, Mariana
Duclos, Diane
DeJong, Jocelyn
Akik, Chaza
Singh, Neha S
author_facet Rodo, Mariana
Duclos, Diane
DeJong, Jocelyn
Akik, Chaza
Singh, Neha S
author_sort Rodo, Mariana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Almost half of the under-5 deaths occur in the neonatal period and most can be prevented with quality newborn care. The already vulnerable state of newborns is exacerbated in humanitarian settings. This review aims to assess the current evidence of the interventions being provided in these contexts, identify strategies that increase their utilisation and their effects on health outcomes in order to inform involved actors in the field and to guide future research. METHODS: Searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature in four databases and in relevant websites, for published studies between 1990 and 15 November 2021. Search terms were related to newborns, humanitarian settings, low-income and middle-income countries and newborn health interventions. Quality assessment using critical appraisal tools appropriate to the study design was conducted. Data were extracted and analysed using a narrative synthesis approach. RESULTS: A total of 35 articles were included in this review, 33 peer-reviewed and 2 grey literature publications. The essential newborn care (ENC) interventions reported varied across the studies and only three used the Newborn Health in Humanitarian Settings: Field Guide as a guideline document. The ENC interventions most commonly reported were thermal care and feeding support whereas delaying of cord clamping and administration of vitamin K were the least. Training of healthcare workers was the most frequent strategy reported to increase utilisation. Community interventions, financial incentives and the provision of supplies and equipment were also reported. CONCLUSION: There is insufficient evidence documenting the reality of newborn care in humanitarian settings in low-income and middle-income countries. There is a need to improve the reporting of these interventions, including when there are gaps in service provision. More evidence is needed on the strategies used to increase their utilisation and the effect on health outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020199639.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9252185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92521852022-07-05 A systematic review of newborn health interventions in humanitarian settings Rodo, Mariana Duclos, Diane DeJong, Jocelyn Akik, Chaza Singh, Neha S BMJ Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Almost half of the under-5 deaths occur in the neonatal period and most can be prevented with quality newborn care. The already vulnerable state of newborns is exacerbated in humanitarian settings. This review aims to assess the current evidence of the interventions being provided in these contexts, identify strategies that increase their utilisation and their effects on health outcomes in order to inform involved actors in the field and to guide future research. METHODS: Searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature in four databases and in relevant websites, for published studies between 1990 and 15 November 2021. Search terms were related to newborns, humanitarian settings, low-income and middle-income countries and newborn health interventions. Quality assessment using critical appraisal tools appropriate to the study design was conducted. Data were extracted and analysed using a narrative synthesis approach. RESULTS: A total of 35 articles were included in this review, 33 peer-reviewed and 2 grey literature publications. The essential newborn care (ENC) interventions reported varied across the studies and only three used the Newborn Health in Humanitarian Settings: Field Guide as a guideline document. The ENC interventions most commonly reported were thermal care and feeding support whereas delaying of cord clamping and administration of vitamin K were the least. Training of healthcare workers was the most frequent strategy reported to increase utilisation. Community interventions, financial incentives and the provision of supplies and equipment were also reported. CONCLUSION: There is insufficient evidence documenting the reality of newborn care in humanitarian settings in low-income and middle-income countries. There is a need to improve the reporting of these interventions, including when there are gaps in service provision. More evidence is needed on the strategies used to increase their utilisation and the effect on health outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020199639. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9252185/ /pubmed/35777926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009082 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rodo, Mariana
Duclos, Diane
DeJong, Jocelyn
Akik, Chaza
Singh, Neha S
A systematic review of newborn health interventions in humanitarian settings
title A systematic review of newborn health interventions in humanitarian settings
title_full A systematic review of newborn health interventions in humanitarian settings
title_fullStr A systematic review of newborn health interventions in humanitarian settings
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of newborn health interventions in humanitarian settings
title_short A systematic review of newborn health interventions in humanitarian settings
title_sort systematic review of newborn health interventions in humanitarian settings
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9252185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35777926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009082
work_keys_str_mv AT rodomariana asystematicreviewofnewbornhealthinterventionsinhumanitariansettings
AT duclosdiane asystematicreviewofnewbornhealthinterventionsinhumanitariansettings
AT dejongjocelyn asystematicreviewofnewbornhealthinterventionsinhumanitariansettings
AT akikchaza asystematicreviewofnewbornhealthinterventionsinhumanitariansettings
AT singhnehas asystematicreviewofnewbornhealthinterventionsinhumanitariansettings
AT rodomariana systematicreviewofnewbornhealthinterventionsinhumanitariansettings
AT duclosdiane systematicreviewofnewbornhealthinterventionsinhumanitariansettings
AT dejongjocelyn systematicreviewofnewbornhealthinterventionsinhumanitariansettings
AT akikchaza systematicreviewofnewbornhealthinterventionsinhumanitariansettings
AT singhnehas systematicreviewofnewbornhealthinterventionsinhumanitariansettings