Cargando…

Flow Diverter in Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) may present as aneurysmal dilation alone, dilation with coexisting stenosis, or, in some cases, as a recurrent aneurysm after previous reconstructive treatment. To date, the clinical utility of flow diverters in VADA has not been ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oh, Han San, Bae, Jin Woo, Hong, Chang-eui, Kim, Kang Min, Yoo, Dong Hyun, Kang, Hyun-Seung, Cho, Young Dae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9253542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35800087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.912863
_version_ 1784740511515410432
author Oh, Han San
Bae, Jin Woo
Hong, Chang-eui
Kim, Kang Min
Yoo, Dong Hyun
Kang, Hyun-Seung
Cho, Young Dae
author_facet Oh, Han San
Bae, Jin Woo
Hong, Chang-eui
Kim, Kang Min
Yoo, Dong Hyun
Kang, Hyun-Seung
Cho, Young Dae
author_sort Oh, Han San
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) may present as aneurysmal dilation alone, dilation with coexisting stenosis, or, in some cases, as a recurrent aneurysm after previous reconstructive treatment. To date, the clinical utility of flow diverters in VADA has not been examined according to these various circumstances. This study aims to report the safety and efficacy of flow diverters in the treatment of various manifestations of intracranial VADA. METHODS: A total of 26 patients and 27 VADAs treated with flow diverting stents from November 2014 to September 2021 were included. Medical records and radiologic data were analyzed to assess the safety and efficacy of flow diverting stents. RESULTS: The results showed that 12 cases (44.4%) presented with aneurysmal dilation only, 7 (26.0%) with aneurysmal dilation and one or more associated stenotic lesions, and 8 (29.6%) as recurrence after previous treatment, including stent-assisted coil embolization (n = 5), single stent only (n = 1), and coil embolization without stent (n = 2). Among 27 lesions, 25 were treated with single flow diverters; additional flow diverting stents were required in 2 cases because of incomplete coverage of the aneurysm neck. There was one instance of incomplete expansion of the flow diverter. All cases showed contrast stagnation in the aneurysmal sac immediately after deployment of the flow diverting stent, and during a mean follow-up period of 18.6 months (range 6 to 60), the overall complete occlusion rate was 55.6%, with complete occlusion of 83.3% of aneurysmal dilation only lesions, 42.9% of aneurysms with stenosis, and 25% of the recurrent aneurysm. Only two patients (7.7%) had delayed ischemic complications. CONCLUSION: Flow diverters have proven safe and effective in unruptured VADA. However, the complete occlusion rate with the flow diverter is relatively lower in VADA with stenosis or with previous stent placement than in dilation-only lesions. Further study with a larger cohort would be needed to confirm these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9253542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92535422022-07-06 Flow Diverter in Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm Oh, Han San Bae, Jin Woo Hong, Chang-eui Kim, Kang Min Yoo, Dong Hyun Kang, Hyun-Seung Cho, Young Dae Front Neurol Neurology OBJECTIVE: Intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) may present as aneurysmal dilation alone, dilation with coexisting stenosis, or, in some cases, as a recurrent aneurysm after previous reconstructive treatment. To date, the clinical utility of flow diverters in VADA has not been examined according to these various circumstances. This study aims to report the safety and efficacy of flow diverters in the treatment of various manifestations of intracranial VADA. METHODS: A total of 26 patients and 27 VADAs treated with flow diverting stents from November 2014 to September 2021 were included. Medical records and radiologic data were analyzed to assess the safety and efficacy of flow diverting stents. RESULTS: The results showed that 12 cases (44.4%) presented with aneurysmal dilation only, 7 (26.0%) with aneurysmal dilation and one or more associated stenotic lesions, and 8 (29.6%) as recurrence after previous treatment, including stent-assisted coil embolization (n = 5), single stent only (n = 1), and coil embolization without stent (n = 2). Among 27 lesions, 25 were treated with single flow diverters; additional flow diverting stents were required in 2 cases because of incomplete coverage of the aneurysm neck. There was one instance of incomplete expansion of the flow diverter. All cases showed contrast stagnation in the aneurysmal sac immediately after deployment of the flow diverting stent, and during a mean follow-up period of 18.6 months (range 6 to 60), the overall complete occlusion rate was 55.6%, with complete occlusion of 83.3% of aneurysmal dilation only lesions, 42.9% of aneurysms with stenosis, and 25% of the recurrent aneurysm. Only two patients (7.7%) had delayed ischemic complications. CONCLUSION: Flow diverters have proven safe and effective in unruptured VADA. However, the complete occlusion rate with the flow diverter is relatively lower in VADA with stenosis or with previous stent placement than in dilation-only lesions. Further study with a larger cohort would be needed to confirm these results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9253542/ /pubmed/35800087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.912863 Text en Copyright © 2022 Oh, Bae, Hong, Kim, Yoo, Kang and Cho. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Oh, Han San
Bae, Jin Woo
Hong, Chang-eui
Kim, Kang Min
Yoo, Dong Hyun
Kang, Hyun-Seung
Cho, Young Dae
Flow Diverter in Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm
title Flow Diverter in Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm
title_full Flow Diverter in Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm
title_fullStr Flow Diverter in Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm
title_full_unstemmed Flow Diverter in Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm
title_short Flow Diverter in Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm
title_sort flow diverter in unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9253542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35800087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.912863
work_keys_str_mv AT ohhansan flowdiverterinunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysm
AT baejinwoo flowdiverterinunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysm
AT hongchangeui flowdiverterinunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysm
AT kimkangmin flowdiverterinunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysm
AT yoodonghyun flowdiverterinunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysm
AT kanghyunseung flowdiverterinunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysm
AT choyoungdae flowdiverterinunrupturedintracranialvertebralarterydissectinganeurysm