Cargando…

Socially Extended Scientific Knowledge

A three-tiered account of social cognition is set out—along with the corresponding variety of social knowledge that results from this social cognition—and applied to the special case of scientific collaboration. The first tier is socially-facilitated cognition, which results in socially-facilitated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pritchard, Duncan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9253682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35800928
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894738
_version_ 1784740546623832064
author Pritchard, Duncan
author_facet Pritchard, Duncan
author_sort Pritchard, Duncan
collection PubMed
description A three-tiered account of social cognition is set out—along with the corresponding variety of social knowledge that results from this social cognition—and applied to the special case of scientific collaboration. The first tier is socially-facilitated cognition, which results in socially-facilitated knowledge. This is a form of cognition which, while genuinely social (in that social factors play an important explanatory role in producing the target cognitive success), falls short of socially extended cognition. The second tier is socially extended cognition, which generates socially extended knowledge. This form of cognition is social in the specific sense of the information-processing of other agents forms part of the socially extended cognitive process at issue. It is argued, however, that the core notion of socially extended cognition is individual in nature, in that the target cognitive success is significantly creditable to the socially extended cognitive agency of the individual. Socially extended cognition, in its core sense, thus generates individual knowledge. Finally, there is distributed cognition, which generates distributed knowledge. This is where the cognitive successes produced by a research team are attributable to a group agent rather than to individuals within the team. Accordingly, where this form of social cognition generates knowledge (distributed knowledge), the knowledge is irreducibly group knowledge. It is argued that by making clear this three-tiered structure of social scientific knowledge a prima facie challenge is posed for defenders of distributed scientific cognition and knowledge to explain why this form of social knowledge is being exhibited and not one of the two weaker (and metaphysically less demanding) forms of social knowledge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9253682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92536822022-07-06 Socially Extended Scientific Knowledge Pritchard, Duncan Front Psychol Psychology A three-tiered account of social cognition is set out—along with the corresponding variety of social knowledge that results from this social cognition—and applied to the special case of scientific collaboration. The first tier is socially-facilitated cognition, which results in socially-facilitated knowledge. This is a form of cognition which, while genuinely social (in that social factors play an important explanatory role in producing the target cognitive success), falls short of socially extended cognition. The second tier is socially extended cognition, which generates socially extended knowledge. This form of cognition is social in the specific sense of the information-processing of other agents forms part of the socially extended cognitive process at issue. It is argued, however, that the core notion of socially extended cognition is individual in nature, in that the target cognitive success is significantly creditable to the socially extended cognitive agency of the individual. Socially extended cognition, in its core sense, thus generates individual knowledge. Finally, there is distributed cognition, which generates distributed knowledge. This is where the cognitive successes produced by a research team are attributable to a group agent rather than to individuals within the team. Accordingly, where this form of social cognition generates knowledge (distributed knowledge), the knowledge is irreducibly group knowledge. It is argued that by making clear this three-tiered structure of social scientific knowledge a prima facie challenge is posed for defenders of distributed scientific cognition and knowledge to explain why this form of social knowledge is being exhibited and not one of the two weaker (and metaphysically less demanding) forms of social knowledge. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9253682/ /pubmed/35800928 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894738 Text en Copyright © 2022 Pritchard. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Pritchard, Duncan
Socially Extended Scientific Knowledge
title Socially Extended Scientific Knowledge
title_full Socially Extended Scientific Knowledge
title_fullStr Socially Extended Scientific Knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Socially Extended Scientific Knowledge
title_short Socially Extended Scientific Knowledge
title_sort socially extended scientific knowledge
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9253682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35800928
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894738
work_keys_str_mv AT pritchardduncan sociallyextendedscientificknowledge