Cargando…

Lifespan and ROS levels in different Drosophila melanogaster strains after 24 h hypoxia exposure

During recent decades, model organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster have made it possible to study the effects of different environmental oxygen conditions on lifespan and oxidative stress. However, many studies have often yielded controversial results usually assigned to variations in Drosophila...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malacrida, Sandro, De Lazzari, Federica, Mrakic-Sposta, Simona, Vezzoli, Alessandra, Zordan, Mauro A., Bisaglia, Marco, Menti, Giulio Maria, Meda, Nicola, Frighetto, Giovanni, Bosco, Gerardo, Dal Cappello, Tomas, Strapazzon, Giacomo, Reggiani, Carlo, Gussoni, Maristella, Megighian, Aram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Company of Biologists Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9253781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35616023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.059386
_version_ 1784740565286387712
author Malacrida, Sandro
De Lazzari, Federica
Mrakic-Sposta, Simona
Vezzoli, Alessandra
Zordan, Mauro A.
Bisaglia, Marco
Menti, Giulio Maria
Meda, Nicola
Frighetto, Giovanni
Bosco, Gerardo
Dal Cappello, Tomas
Strapazzon, Giacomo
Reggiani, Carlo
Gussoni, Maristella
Megighian, Aram
author_facet Malacrida, Sandro
De Lazzari, Federica
Mrakic-Sposta, Simona
Vezzoli, Alessandra
Zordan, Mauro A.
Bisaglia, Marco
Menti, Giulio Maria
Meda, Nicola
Frighetto, Giovanni
Bosco, Gerardo
Dal Cappello, Tomas
Strapazzon, Giacomo
Reggiani, Carlo
Gussoni, Maristella
Megighian, Aram
author_sort Malacrida, Sandro
collection PubMed
description During recent decades, model organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster have made it possible to study the effects of different environmental oxygen conditions on lifespan and oxidative stress. However, many studies have often yielded controversial results usually assigned to variations in Drosophila genetic background and differences in study design. In this study, we compared longevity and ROS levels in young, unmated males of three laboratory wild-type lines (Canton-S, Oregon-R and Berlin-K) and one mutant line (Sod1(n1)) as a positive control of redox imbalance, under both normoxic and hypoxic (2% oxygen for 24 h) conditions. Lifespan was used to detect the effects of hypoxic treatment and differences were analysed by means of Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log-rank tests. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to measure ROS levels and analysis of variance was used to estimate the effects of hypoxic treatment and to assess ROS differences between strains. We observed that the genetic background is a relevant factor involved in D. melanogaster longevity and ROS levels. Indeed, as expected, in normoxia Sod1(n1) are the shortest-lived, while the wild-type strains, despite a longer lifespan, show some differences, with the Canton-S line displaying the lowest mortality rate. After hypoxic stress these variances are amplified, with Berlin-K flies showing the highest mortality rate and most evident reduction of lifespan. Moreover, our analysis highlighted differential effects of hypoxia on redox balance/unbalance. Canton-S flies had the lowest increase of ROS level compared to all the other strains, confirming it to be the less sensitive to hypoxic stress. Sod1(n1) flies displayed the highest ROS levels in normoxia and after hypoxia. These results should be used to further standardize future Drosophila research models designed to investigate genes and pathways that may be involved in lifespan and/or ROS, as well as comparative studies on specific mutant strains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9253781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Company of Biologists Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92537812022-07-05 Lifespan and ROS levels in different Drosophila melanogaster strains after 24 h hypoxia exposure Malacrida, Sandro De Lazzari, Federica Mrakic-Sposta, Simona Vezzoli, Alessandra Zordan, Mauro A. Bisaglia, Marco Menti, Giulio Maria Meda, Nicola Frighetto, Giovanni Bosco, Gerardo Dal Cappello, Tomas Strapazzon, Giacomo Reggiani, Carlo Gussoni, Maristella Megighian, Aram Biol Open Research Article During recent decades, model organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster have made it possible to study the effects of different environmental oxygen conditions on lifespan and oxidative stress. However, many studies have often yielded controversial results usually assigned to variations in Drosophila genetic background and differences in study design. In this study, we compared longevity and ROS levels in young, unmated males of three laboratory wild-type lines (Canton-S, Oregon-R and Berlin-K) and one mutant line (Sod1(n1)) as a positive control of redox imbalance, under both normoxic and hypoxic (2% oxygen for 24 h) conditions. Lifespan was used to detect the effects of hypoxic treatment and differences were analysed by means of Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log-rank tests. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to measure ROS levels and analysis of variance was used to estimate the effects of hypoxic treatment and to assess ROS differences between strains. We observed that the genetic background is a relevant factor involved in D. melanogaster longevity and ROS levels. Indeed, as expected, in normoxia Sod1(n1) are the shortest-lived, while the wild-type strains, despite a longer lifespan, show some differences, with the Canton-S line displaying the lowest mortality rate. After hypoxic stress these variances are amplified, with Berlin-K flies showing the highest mortality rate and most evident reduction of lifespan. Moreover, our analysis highlighted differential effects of hypoxia on redox balance/unbalance. Canton-S flies had the lowest increase of ROS level compared to all the other strains, confirming it to be the less sensitive to hypoxic stress. Sod1(n1) flies displayed the highest ROS levels in normoxia and after hypoxia. These results should be used to further standardize future Drosophila research models designed to investigate genes and pathways that may be involved in lifespan and/or ROS, as well as comparative studies on specific mutant strains. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9253781/ /pubmed/35616023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.059386 Text en © 2022. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article
Malacrida, Sandro
De Lazzari, Federica
Mrakic-Sposta, Simona
Vezzoli, Alessandra
Zordan, Mauro A.
Bisaglia, Marco
Menti, Giulio Maria
Meda, Nicola
Frighetto, Giovanni
Bosco, Gerardo
Dal Cappello, Tomas
Strapazzon, Giacomo
Reggiani, Carlo
Gussoni, Maristella
Megighian, Aram
Lifespan and ROS levels in different Drosophila melanogaster strains after 24 h hypoxia exposure
title Lifespan and ROS levels in different Drosophila melanogaster strains after 24 h hypoxia exposure
title_full Lifespan and ROS levels in different Drosophila melanogaster strains after 24 h hypoxia exposure
title_fullStr Lifespan and ROS levels in different Drosophila melanogaster strains after 24 h hypoxia exposure
title_full_unstemmed Lifespan and ROS levels in different Drosophila melanogaster strains after 24 h hypoxia exposure
title_short Lifespan and ROS levels in different Drosophila melanogaster strains after 24 h hypoxia exposure
title_sort lifespan and ros levels in different drosophila melanogaster strains after 24 h hypoxia exposure
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9253781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35616023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.059386
work_keys_str_mv AT malacridasandro lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure
AT delazzarifederica lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure
AT mrakicspostasimona lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure
AT vezzolialessandra lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure
AT zordanmauroa lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure
AT bisagliamarco lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure
AT mentigiuliomaria lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure
AT medanicola lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure
AT frighettogiovanni lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure
AT boscogerardo lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure
AT dalcappellotomas lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure
AT strapazzongiacomo lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure
AT reggianicarlo lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure
AT gussonimaristella lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure
AT megighianaram lifespanandroslevelsindifferentdrosophilamelanogasterstrainsafter24hhypoxiaexposure