Cargando…

Fatty infiltration in cervical extensor muscle: is there a relationship with cervical sagittal alignment after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between the preoperative paraspinal Goutalier grade of fatty infiltration and postoperative cervical sagittal alignment in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: A total of 101 patients who underwent single-level ACDF wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xing-jin, Huang, Kang-kang, He, Jun-bo, Wu, Ting-kui, Rong, Xin, Liu, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9254416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35791024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05606-0
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between the preoperative paraspinal Goutalier grade of fatty infiltration and postoperative cervical sagittal alignment in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: A total of 101 patients who underwent single-level ACDF with the Zero-profile implant system between March 2011 and April 2020 were included in this study. Cervical sagittal alignment parameters, including the C2-C7 Cobb angle, functional spinal unit (FSU) angle, cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1 slope (T1S), were assessed. Preoperative magnetic resonance images were used to classify patients according to Goutalier grade. Clinical outcomes including Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, Japanese Orthepaedic Association (JOA) scores and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: According to the Goutalier grade, 33 patients were classified as Goutalier 0–1 (Group A), 44 were classified as Goutalier 1.5–2 (Group B), and 24 were classified as Goutalier 2.5–4.0 (Group C). The mean age among the three groups showed significant differences (P = 0.007). At the last follow-up, the C2-C7 Cobb angle, FSU angle, and T1S improved after the surgery among the groups. Although there were varying degrees of loss of curvature among the different groups during the follow-up period, the postoperative cervical sagittal alignment parameters demonstrated no statistical differences among the three groups (P > 0.05). In addition, patients in all groups experienced significant relief of their symptoms, and the clinical scores were comparable among the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The complex nature of anterior cervical surgery requires surgical attention both in decompression and sagittal alignment. Our study demonstrates satisfactory postoperative cervical sagittal alignment of patients despite different grades of fatty infiltration of the multifidus muscle following single-level ACDF. Based on our results, the improvement and maintenance of cervical sagittal alignment after ACDF remains a complex problem that spine surgeons should consider before surgery.