Cargando…

The patient’s relationship with the General Practitioner before and after Advance Care Planning: pre/post-implementation study

BACKGROUND: General Practitioners (GPs) are central in the care of Dutch older people and in a good position to have Advance Care Planning (ACP) conversations. Interview studies reveal that the doctor-patient relationship is important when initiating ACP conversations and can also be influenced by A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Plas, Annicka G. M., Schellekens, Julia E. A. P., Glaudemans, Jolien J., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9254656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35790910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03256-4
_version_ 1784740749313572864
author van der Plas, Annicka G. M.
Schellekens, Julia E. A. P.
Glaudemans, Jolien J.
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.
author_facet van der Plas, Annicka G. M.
Schellekens, Julia E. A. P.
Glaudemans, Jolien J.
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.
author_sort van der Plas, Annicka G. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: General Practitioners (GPs) are central in the care of Dutch older people and in a good position to have Advance Care Planning (ACP) conversations. Interview studies reveal that the doctor-patient relationship is important when initiating ACP conversations and can also be influenced by ACP conversations. We aimed to examine the association between having an ACP conversation and the patient feeling the GP knows him or her and the patient trusting the GP and vice versa. METHODS: Implementation of ACP in primary care was evaluated in a pre-and post design. Questionnaires before implementation of ACP and 14 months later were sent to patients aged 75 years or older within 10 GP-practices and 2 care homes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the relationship between ACP conversations during implementation and the patient-GP relationship before implementation. Odds ratios were adjusted for potential confounders. Generalized ordered logistic regression was used to model the relationship between the changes in patient-GP relationship before and after implementation and ACP conversations during implementation. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-eight patients filled out the pre- and post-test questionnaire. There was no association between the GP knowing the patient and trust in the pre-test and having an ACP conversation during the implementation. For people who had had an ACP conversation at the end of the implementation period their trust remained more often the same or was higher after implementation (trust to provide good care OR 2.93; trust to follow their wishes OR 2.59), compared to patients who did not have an ACP conversation. A reduction in trust was less likely to happen to patients who had an ACP conversation compared to patients who did not have an ACP conversation. CONCLUSIONS: Although we have not found evidence for trust as a prerequisite for ACP conversations, this paper shows that ACP conversations can be beneficial for the doctor—patient relationship. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03256-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9254656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92546562022-07-06 The patient’s relationship with the General Practitioner before and after Advance Care Planning: pre/post-implementation study van der Plas, Annicka G. M. Schellekens, Julia E. A. P. Glaudemans, Jolien J. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D. BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: General Practitioners (GPs) are central in the care of Dutch older people and in a good position to have Advance Care Planning (ACP) conversations. Interview studies reveal that the doctor-patient relationship is important when initiating ACP conversations and can also be influenced by ACP conversations. We aimed to examine the association between having an ACP conversation and the patient feeling the GP knows him or her and the patient trusting the GP and vice versa. METHODS: Implementation of ACP in primary care was evaluated in a pre-and post design. Questionnaires before implementation of ACP and 14 months later were sent to patients aged 75 years or older within 10 GP-practices and 2 care homes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the relationship between ACP conversations during implementation and the patient-GP relationship before implementation. Odds ratios were adjusted for potential confounders. Generalized ordered logistic regression was used to model the relationship between the changes in patient-GP relationship before and after implementation and ACP conversations during implementation. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-eight patients filled out the pre- and post-test questionnaire. There was no association between the GP knowing the patient and trust in the pre-test and having an ACP conversation during the implementation. For people who had had an ACP conversation at the end of the implementation period their trust remained more often the same or was higher after implementation (trust to provide good care OR 2.93; trust to follow their wishes OR 2.59), compared to patients who did not have an ACP conversation. A reduction in trust was less likely to happen to patients who had an ACP conversation compared to patients who did not have an ACP conversation. CONCLUSIONS: Although we have not found evidence for trust as a prerequisite for ACP conversations, this paper shows that ACP conversations can be beneficial for the doctor—patient relationship. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03256-4. BioMed Central 2022-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9254656/ /pubmed/35790910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03256-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
van der Plas, Annicka G. M.
Schellekens, Julia E. A. P.
Glaudemans, Jolien J.
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.
The patient’s relationship with the General Practitioner before and after Advance Care Planning: pre/post-implementation study
title The patient’s relationship with the General Practitioner before and after Advance Care Planning: pre/post-implementation study
title_full The patient’s relationship with the General Practitioner before and after Advance Care Planning: pre/post-implementation study
title_fullStr The patient’s relationship with the General Practitioner before and after Advance Care Planning: pre/post-implementation study
title_full_unstemmed The patient’s relationship with the General Practitioner before and after Advance Care Planning: pre/post-implementation study
title_short The patient’s relationship with the General Practitioner before and after Advance Care Planning: pre/post-implementation study
title_sort patient’s relationship with the general practitioner before and after advance care planning: pre/post-implementation study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9254656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35790910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03256-4
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderplasannickagm thepatientsrelationshipwiththegeneralpractitionerbeforeandafteradvancecareplanningprepostimplementationstudy
AT schellekensjuliaeap thepatientsrelationshipwiththegeneralpractitionerbeforeandafteradvancecareplanningprepostimplementationstudy
AT glaudemansjolienj thepatientsrelationshipwiththegeneralpractitionerbeforeandafteradvancecareplanningprepostimplementationstudy
AT onwuteakaphilipsenbregjed thepatientsrelationshipwiththegeneralpractitionerbeforeandafteradvancecareplanningprepostimplementationstudy
AT vanderplasannickagm patientsrelationshipwiththegeneralpractitionerbeforeandafteradvancecareplanningprepostimplementationstudy
AT schellekensjuliaeap patientsrelationshipwiththegeneralpractitionerbeforeandafteradvancecareplanningprepostimplementationstudy
AT glaudemansjolienj patientsrelationshipwiththegeneralpractitionerbeforeandafteradvancecareplanningprepostimplementationstudy
AT onwuteakaphilipsenbregjed patientsrelationshipwiththegeneralpractitionerbeforeandafteradvancecareplanningprepostimplementationstudy