Cargando…
Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods
CONTEXT: Bone remodeling comprises balanced coupling of bone formation and resorption, and low bone mineral density (BMD) demonstrates high rates of bone resorption. Osteoporosis is a chronic asymptomatic disease with fragile bones and impending risk of fractures mediated by minor trauma. Whereas bo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799999 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S357417 |
_version_ | 1784740918076637184 |
---|---|
author | Shaikhomar, Osama A Abdelghnay, Abdelghnay H Qutob, Haitham M H |
author_facet | Shaikhomar, Osama A Abdelghnay, Abdelghnay H Qutob, Haitham M H |
author_sort | Shaikhomar, Osama A |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Bone remodeling comprises balanced coupling of bone formation and resorption, and low bone mineral density (BMD) demonstrates high rates of bone resorption. Osteoporosis is a chronic asymptomatic disease with fragile bones and impending risk of fractures mediated by minor trauma. Whereas bone mineralization and integrity are determined by calcium and vitamin D, specific serum markers such as bone specific alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteocalcin (OC) play a vital role in bone formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum calcium, vitamin D, ALP, and OC levels were measured in 2,145 Saudi students aged 18–22 years at Umm Al-Qura University. The BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and the findings were statistically evaluated. The following statistics were utilized in the analysis: the SPSS software was used to record, tabulate, and statistically evaluate the results. RESULTS: Low BMD cases accounted for 27.46% of all cases investigated, with considerably higher serum calcium, bone-specific ALP, and OC levels compared to control cases, but significantly lower serum vitamin D levels. In low BMD instances, there was no association between serum markers and DEXA findings. CONCLUSION: Serum indicators by themselves may be useful for screening and predicting patients at risk of osteoporosis, as well as assessing treatment response. The combination of serum markers and DEXA measures is more effective in detecting low BMD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9255419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92554192022-07-06 Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods Shaikhomar, Osama A Abdelghnay, Abdelghnay H Qutob, Haitham M H Int J Gen Med Original Research CONTEXT: Bone remodeling comprises balanced coupling of bone formation and resorption, and low bone mineral density (BMD) demonstrates high rates of bone resorption. Osteoporosis is a chronic asymptomatic disease with fragile bones and impending risk of fractures mediated by minor trauma. Whereas bone mineralization and integrity are determined by calcium and vitamin D, specific serum markers such as bone specific alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteocalcin (OC) play a vital role in bone formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum calcium, vitamin D, ALP, and OC levels were measured in 2,145 Saudi students aged 18–22 years at Umm Al-Qura University. The BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and the findings were statistically evaluated. The following statistics were utilized in the analysis: the SPSS software was used to record, tabulate, and statistically evaluate the results. RESULTS: Low BMD cases accounted for 27.46% of all cases investigated, with considerably higher serum calcium, bone-specific ALP, and OC levels compared to control cases, but significantly lower serum vitamin D levels. In low BMD instances, there was no association between serum markers and DEXA findings. CONCLUSION: Serum indicators by themselves may be useful for screening and predicting patients at risk of osteoporosis, as well as assessing treatment response. The combination of serum markers and DEXA measures is more effective in detecting low BMD. Dove 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9255419/ /pubmed/35799999 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S357417 Text en © 2022 Shaikhomar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Shaikhomar, Osama A Abdelghnay, Abdelghnay H Qutob, Haitham M H Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods |
title | Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods |
title_full | Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods |
title_fullStr | Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods |
title_short | Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods |
title_sort | diagnosis of low bone mass density: serological versus radiological methods |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799999 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S357417 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shaikhomarosamaa diagnosisoflowbonemassdensityserologicalversusradiologicalmethods AT abdelghnayabdelghnayh diagnosisoflowbonemassdensityserologicalversusradiologicalmethods AT qutobhaithammh diagnosisoflowbonemassdensityserologicalversusradiologicalmethods |