Cargando…

Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods

CONTEXT: Bone remodeling comprises balanced coupling of bone formation and resorption, and low bone mineral density (BMD) demonstrates high rates of bone resorption. Osteoporosis is a chronic asymptomatic disease with fragile bones and impending risk of fractures mediated by minor trauma. Whereas bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaikhomar, Osama A, Abdelghnay, Abdelghnay H, Qutob, Haitham M H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799999
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S357417
_version_ 1784740918076637184
author Shaikhomar, Osama A
Abdelghnay, Abdelghnay H
Qutob, Haitham M H
author_facet Shaikhomar, Osama A
Abdelghnay, Abdelghnay H
Qutob, Haitham M H
author_sort Shaikhomar, Osama A
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Bone remodeling comprises balanced coupling of bone formation and resorption, and low bone mineral density (BMD) demonstrates high rates of bone resorption. Osteoporosis is a chronic asymptomatic disease with fragile bones and impending risk of fractures mediated by minor trauma. Whereas bone mineralization and integrity are determined by calcium and vitamin D, specific serum markers such as bone specific alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteocalcin (OC) play a vital role in bone formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum calcium, vitamin D, ALP, and OC levels were measured in 2,145 Saudi students aged 18–22 years at Umm Al-Qura University. The BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and the findings were statistically evaluated. The following statistics were utilized in the analysis: the SPSS software was used to record, tabulate, and statistically evaluate the results. RESULTS: Low BMD cases accounted for 27.46% of all cases investigated, with considerably higher serum calcium, bone-specific ALP, and OC levels compared to control cases, but significantly lower serum vitamin D levels. In low BMD instances, there was no association between serum markers and DEXA findings. CONCLUSION: Serum indicators by themselves may be useful for screening and predicting patients at risk of osteoporosis, as well as assessing treatment response. The combination of serum markers and DEXA measures is more effective in detecting low BMD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9255419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92554192022-07-06 Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods Shaikhomar, Osama A Abdelghnay, Abdelghnay H Qutob, Haitham M H Int J Gen Med Original Research CONTEXT: Bone remodeling comprises balanced coupling of bone formation and resorption, and low bone mineral density (BMD) demonstrates high rates of bone resorption. Osteoporosis is a chronic asymptomatic disease with fragile bones and impending risk of fractures mediated by minor trauma. Whereas bone mineralization and integrity are determined by calcium and vitamin D, specific serum markers such as bone specific alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteocalcin (OC) play a vital role in bone formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum calcium, vitamin D, ALP, and OC levels were measured in 2,145 Saudi students aged 18–22 years at Umm Al-Qura University. The BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and the findings were statistically evaluated. The following statistics were utilized in the analysis: the SPSS software was used to record, tabulate, and statistically evaluate the results. RESULTS: Low BMD cases accounted for 27.46% of all cases investigated, with considerably higher serum calcium, bone-specific ALP, and OC levels compared to control cases, but significantly lower serum vitamin D levels. In low BMD instances, there was no association between serum markers and DEXA findings. CONCLUSION: Serum indicators by themselves may be useful for screening and predicting patients at risk of osteoporosis, as well as assessing treatment response. The combination of serum markers and DEXA measures is more effective in detecting low BMD. Dove 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9255419/ /pubmed/35799999 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S357417 Text en © 2022 Shaikhomar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Shaikhomar, Osama A
Abdelghnay, Abdelghnay H
Qutob, Haitham M H
Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods
title Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods
title_full Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods
title_fullStr Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods
title_short Diagnosis of Low Bone Mass Density: Serological versus Radiological Methods
title_sort diagnosis of low bone mass density: serological versus radiological methods
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799999
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S357417
work_keys_str_mv AT shaikhomarosamaa diagnosisoflowbonemassdensityserologicalversusradiologicalmethods
AT abdelghnayabdelghnayh diagnosisoflowbonemassdensityserologicalversusradiologicalmethods
AT qutobhaithammh diagnosisoflowbonemassdensityserologicalversusradiologicalmethods