Cargando…
Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma
PURPOSE: Rituximab (R) or obinutuzumab (G) combined with CHOP chemotherapy are used in previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL). The aim is to compare in real life setting the efficacy and safety of these therapeutic strategies and assess the economic impact of introducing G. METHODS: This retr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35789429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04155-2 |
_version_ | 1784740927049302016 |
---|---|
author | Claustre, Gwladys Boulanger, Coralie Maloisel, Frédéric Etienne-Selloum, Nelly Fornecker, Luc-Matthieu Durot, Eric Slimano, Florian Graff, Véronique |
author_facet | Claustre, Gwladys Boulanger, Coralie Maloisel, Frédéric Etienne-Selloum, Nelly Fornecker, Luc-Matthieu Durot, Eric Slimano, Florian Graff, Véronique |
author_sort | Claustre, Gwladys |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Rituximab (R) or obinutuzumab (G) combined with CHOP chemotherapy are used in previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL). The aim is to compare in real life setting the efficacy and safety of these therapeutic strategies and assess the economic impact of introducing G. METHODS: This retrospective study, performed in 3 centers, included data from all patients who received R-CHOP or G-CHOP for previous untreated FL from June 1st, 2016 to December 31st, 2020. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were estimated according to the Kaplan–Meier method. A budgetary impact model was performed from the French health care system’s perspective. RESULTS: N = 124 patients were included (58 G-CHOP; 66 R-CHOP). Fifty-one and 57 patients achieved a complete response at the end of induction in the G-CHOP and R-CHOP group, respectively. PFS was not significantly longer in the G-CHOP group (HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.08–0.97; p value = 0.14). Hematological toxicity occurred more frequently with G-CHOP than R-CHOP during induction treatment (n = 58; 100% vs. n = 61; 92%), including higher severe neutropenia (grade ≥ 3) (n = 26; 45% vs. n = 23; 35%). Infusion-related reactions during the first infusion occurred more frequently with G-CHOP (n = 19; 33% vs. n = 16; 24%). The introduction of a completed G treatment (induction and maintenance) results in an additional cumulative cost per patient estimated at more than €30,000. CONCLUSION: Similar results were found in the GALLIUM subgroup analysis study, suggesting that at this time there is no absolute benefit to administer G-CHOP instead of R-CHOP in all patients with previously untreated FL and may encourage clinical and economic trials including quality of life data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04155-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9255466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92554662022-07-06 Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma Claustre, Gwladys Boulanger, Coralie Maloisel, Frédéric Etienne-Selloum, Nelly Fornecker, Luc-Matthieu Durot, Eric Slimano, Florian Graff, Véronique J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology PURPOSE: Rituximab (R) or obinutuzumab (G) combined with CHOP chemotherapy are used in previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL). The aim is to compare in real life setting the efficacy and safety of these therapeutic strategies and assess the economic impact of introducing G. METHODS: This retrospective study, performed in 3 centers, included data from all patients who received R-CHOP or G-CHOP for previous untreated FL from June 1st, 2016 to December 31st, 2020. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were estimated according to the Kaplan–Meier method. A budgetary impact model was performed from the French health care system’s perspective. RESULTS: N = 124 patients were included (58 G-CHOP; 66 R-CHOP). Fifty-one and 57 patients achieved a complete response at the end of induction in the G-CHOP and R-CHOP group, respectively. PFS was not significantly longer in the G-CHOP group (HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.08–0.97; p value = 0.14). Hematological toxicity occurred more frequently with G-CHOP than R-CHOP during induction treatment (n = 58; 100% vs. n = 61; 92%), including higher severe neutropenia (grade ≥ 3) (n = 26; 45% vs. n = 23; 35%). Infusion-related reactions during the first infusion occurred more frequently with G-CHOP (n = 19; 33% vs. n = 16; 24%). The introduction of a completed G treatment (induction and maintenance) results in an additional cumulative cost per patient estimated at more than €30,000. CONCLUSION: Similar results were found in the GALLIUM subgroup analysis study, suggesting that at this time there is no absolute benefit to administer G-CHOP instead of R-CHOP in all patients with previously untreated FL and may encourage clinical and economic trials including quality of life data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04155-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9255466/ /pubmed/35789429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04155-2 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article – Clinical Oncology Claustre, Gwladys Boulanger, Coralie Maloisel, Frédéric Etienne-Selloum, Nelly Fornecker, Luc-Matthieu Durot, Eric Slimano, Florian Graff, Véronique Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma |
title | Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma |
title_full | Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma |
title_short | Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma |
title_sort | comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with chop in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma |
topic | Original Article – Clinical Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35789429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04155-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT claustregwladys comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma AT boulangercoralie comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma AT maloiselfrederic comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma AT etienneselloumnelly comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma AT forneckerlucmatthieu comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma AT duroteric comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma AT slimanoflorian comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma AT graffveronique comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma |