Cargando…

Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma

PURPOSE: Rituximab (R) or obinutuzumab (G) combined with CHOP chemotherapy are used in previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL). The aim is to compare in real life setting the efficacy and safety of these therapeutic strategies and assess the economic impact of introducing G. METHODS: This retr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claustre, Gwladys, Boulanger, Coralie, Maloisel, Frédéric, Etienne-Selloum, Nelly, Fornecker, Luc-Matthieu, Durot, Eric, Slimano, Florian, Graff, Véronique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35789429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04155-2
_version_ 1784740927049302016
author Claustre, Gwladys
Boulanger, Coralie
Maloisel, Frédéric
Etienne-Selloum, Nelly
Fornecker, Luc-Matthieu
Durot, Eric
Slimano, Florian
Graff, Véronique
author_facet Claustre, Gwladys
Boulanger, Coralie
Maloisel, Frédéric
Etienne-Selloum, Nelly
Fornecker, Luc-Matthieu
Durot, Eric
Slimano, Florian
Graff, Véronique
author_sort Claustre, Gwladys
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Rituximab (R) or obinutuzumab (G) combined with CHOP chemotherapy are used in previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL). The aim is to compare in real life setting the efficacy and safety of these therapeutic strategies and assess the economic impact of introducing G. METHODS: This retrospective study, performed in 3 centers, included data from all patients who received R-CHOP or G-CHOP for previous untreated FL from June 1st, 2016 to December 31st, 2020. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were estimated according to the Kaplan–Meier method. A budgetary impact model was performed from the French health care system’s perspective. RESULTS: N = 124 patients were included (58 G-CHOP; 66 R-CHOP). Fifty-one and 57 patients achieved a complete response at the end of induction in the G-CHOP and R-CHOP group, respectively. PFS was not significantly longer in the G-CHOP group (HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.08–0.97; p value = 0.14). Hematological toxicity occurred more frequently with G-CHOP than R-CHOP during induction treatment (n = 58; 100% vs. n = 61; 92%), including higher severe neutropenia (grade ≥ 3) (n = 26; 45% vs. n = 23; 35%). Infusion-related reactions during the first infusion occurred more frequently with G-CHOP (n = 19; 33% vs. n = 16; 24%). The introduction of a completed G treatment (induction and maintenance) results in an additional cumulative cost per patient estimated at more than €30,000. CONCLUSION: Similar results were found in the GALLIUM subgroup analysis study, suggesting that at this time there is no absolute benefit to administer G-CHOP instead of R-CHOP in all patients with previously untreated FL and may encourage clinical and economic trials including quality of life data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04155-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9255466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92554662022-07-06 Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma Claustre, Gwladys Boulanger, Coralie Maloisel, Frédéric Etienne-Selloum, Nelly Fornecker, Luc-Matthieu Durot, Eric Slimano, Florian Graff, Véronique J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology PURPOSE: Rituximab (R) or obinutuzumab (G) combined with CHOP chemotherapy are used in previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL). The aim is to compare in real life setting the efficacy and safety of these therapeutic strategies and assess the economic impact of introducing G. METHODS: This retrospective study, performed in 3 centers, included data from all patients who received R-CHOP or G-CHOP for previous untreated FL from June 1st, 2016 to December 31st, 2020. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were estimated according to the Kaplan–Meier method. A budgetary impact model was performed from the French health care system’s perspective. RESULTS: N = 124 patients were included (58 G-CHOP; 66 R-CHOP). Fifty-one and 57 patients achieved a complete response at the end of induction in the G-CHOP and R-CHOP group, respectively. PFS was not significantly longer in the G-CHOP group (HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.08–0.97; p value = 0.14). Hematological toxicity occurred more frequently with G-CHOP than R-CHOP during induction treatment (n = 58; 100% vs. n = 61; 92%), including higher severe neutropenia (grade ≥ 3) (n = 26; 45% vs. n = 23; 35%). Infusion-related reactions during the first infusion occurred more frequently with G-CHOP (n = 19; 33% vs. n = 16; 24%). The introduction of a completed G treatment (induction and maintenance) results in an additional cumulative cost per patient estimated at more than €30,000. CONCLUSION: Similar results were found in the GALLIUM subgroup analysis study, suggesting that at this time there is no absolute benefit to administer G-CHOP instead of R-CHOP in all patients with previously untreated FL and may encourage clinical and economic trials including quality of life data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04155-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9255466/ /pubmed/35789429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04155-2 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article – Clinical Oncology
Claustre, Gwladys
Boulanger, Coralie
Maloisel, Frédéric
Etienne-Selloum, Nelly
Fornecker, Luc-Matthieu
Durot, Eric
Slimano, Florian
Graff, Véronique
Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma
title Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma
title_full Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma
title_short Comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with CHOP in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma
title_sort comparative analysis of rituximab or obinutuzumab combined with chop in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma
topic Original Article – Clinical Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35789429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04155-2
work_keys_str_mv AT claustregwladys comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma
AT boulangercoralie comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma
AT maloiselfrederic comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma
AT etienneselloumnelly comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma
AT forneckerlucmatthieu comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma
AT duroteric comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma
AT slimanoflorian comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma
AT graffveronique comparativeanalysisofrituximaborobinutuzumabcombinedwithchopinfirstlinetreatmentoffollicularlymphoma