Cargando…

Item-level psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire

The aim of this study is to evaluate the item-level psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire (AD-8) by examining its dimensionality, rating scale integrity, item fit statistics, item difficulty hierarchy, item-person match, and precision. We used confirmatory factor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ham, Yeajin, Bae, Suyeong, Lee, Heerim, Ha, Yaena, Choi, Heesu, Park, Ji-Hyuk, Park, Hae Yean, Hong, Ickpyo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35789335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270204
_version_ 1784740975508193280
author Ham, Yeajin
Bae, Suyeong
Lee, Heerim
Ha, Yaena
Choi, Heesu
Park, Ji-Hyuk
Park, Hae Yean
Hong, Ickpyo
author_facet Ham, Yeajin
Bae, Suyeong
Lee, Heerim
Ha, Yaena
Choi, Heesu
Park, Ji-Hyuk
Park, Hae Yean
Hong, Ickpyo
author_sort Ham, Yeajin
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study is to evaluate the item-level psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire (AD-8) by examining its dimensionality, rating scale integrity, item fit statistics, item difficulty hierarchy, item-person match, and precision. We used confirmatory factor analysis and the Rasch rating scale model for analyzing the data extracted from the proxy versions of the 2019 and 2020 National Health and Aging Trends Study, USA. A total of 403 participants were included in the analysis. The confirmatory factor analysis with a 1-factor model using the robust weighted least squares (WLSMV) estimator indicated a unidimensional measurement structure (χ(2) = 41.015, df = 20, p = 0.004; root mean square error of approximation = 0.051; comparative fit index = 0.995; Tucker–Lewis Index = 0.993;). The findings indicated that the AD-8 has no misfitting items and no differential item functioning across sex and gender. The items were evenly distributed in the item difficulty rating (range: −2.30 to 0.98 logits). While there were floor effects, the AD-8 revealed good reliability (Rasch person reliability = 0.67, Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89). The Rasch analysis reveals that the AD-8 has excellent psychometric properties that can be used as a screening assessment tool in clinical settings allowing clinicians to measure dementia both quickly and efficiently. To summarize, the AD-8 could be a useful primary screening tool to be used with additional diagnostic testing, if the patient is accompanied by a reliable informant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9255723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92557232022-07-06 Item-level psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire Ham, Yeajin Bae, Suyeong Lee, Heerim Ha, Yaena Choi, Heesu Park, Ji-Hyuk Park, Hae Yean Hong, Ickpyo PLoS One Research Article The aim of this study is to evaluate the item-level psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire (AD-8) by examining its dimensionality, rating scale integrity, item fit statistics, item difficulty hierarchy, item-person match, and precision. We used confirmatory factor analysis and the Rasch rating scale model for analyzing the data extracted from the proxy versions of the 2019 and 2020 National Health and Aging Trends Study, USA. A total of 403 participants were included in the analysis. The confirmatory factor analysis with a 1-factor model using the robust weighted least squares (WLSMV) estimator indicated a unidimensional measurement structure (χ(2) = 41.015, df = 20, p = 0.004; root mean square error of approximation = 0.051; comparative fit index = 0.995; Tucker–Lewis Index = 0.993;). The findings indicated that the AD-8 has no misfitting items and no differential item functioning across sex and gender. The items were evenly distributed in the item difficulty rating (range: −2.30 to 0.98 logits). While there were floor effects, the AD-8 revealed good reliability (Rasch person reliability = 0.67, Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89). The Rasch analysis reveals that the AD-8 has excellent psychometric properties that can be used as a screening assessment tool in clinical settings allowing clinicians to measure dementia both quickly and efficiently. To summarize, the AD-8 could be a useful primary screening tool to be used with additional diagnostic testing, if the patient is accompanied by a reliable informant. Public Library of Science 2022-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9255723/ /pubmed/35789335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270204 Text en © 2022 Ham et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ham, Yeajin
Bae, Suyeong
Lee, Heerim
Ha, Yaena
Choi, Heesu
Park, Ji-Hyuk
Park, Hae Yean
Hong, Ickpyo
Item-level psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire
title Item-level psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire
title_full Item-level psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire
title_fullStr Item-level psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Item-level psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire
title_short Item-level psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire
title_sort item-level psychometrics of the ascertain dementia eight-item informant questionnaire
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35789335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270204
work_keys_str_mv AT hamyeajin itemlevelpsychometricsoftheascertaindementiaeightiteminformantquestionnaire
AT baesuyeong itemlevelpsychometricsoftheascertaindementiaeightiteminformantquestionnaire
AT leeheerim itemlevelpsychometricsoftheascertaindementiaeightiteminformantquestionnaire
AT hayaena itemlevelpsychometricsoftheascertaindementiaeightiteminformantquestionnaire
AT choiheesu itemlevelpsychometricsoftheascertaindementiaeightiteminformantquestionnaire
AT parkjihyuk itemlevelpsychometricsoftheascertaindementiaeightiteminformantquestionnaire
AT parkhaeyean itemlevelpsychometricsoftheascertaindementiaeightiteminformantquestionnaire
AT hongickpyo itemlevelpsychometricsoftheascertaindementiaeightiteminformantquestionnaire